Ugyops samoaensis Muir
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5174008 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5B298959-4DF9-41E7-8490-E413E8B7B562 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5211439 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/416187ED-EB5D-FFFB-FE91-4DED8C7FF4F7 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Ugyops samoaensis Muir |
status |
|
2. Ugyops samoaensis Muir View in CoL ,
Haw. Ent. Soc., Proc. 4: 573, pl. 10, fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ,
1921. (See figure 3, a-d.)
Ugyops sulcata Muir, Austr. Mus., Rec. View in CoL 18: 70, figs. 12-14, 1931.
There is, so far as I can see, no essential difference between these two species. U. samoa:ensis was described from Samoa and Savage Island [ Niue], and U. sulcata was described from the New Hebrides. This species, therefore, would seem to have a wide distribution in the Oceanic region. All the specimens have the tegmina short, barely covering the abdomen; in the male genitalia the ventral margin of the pygofer is produced in a broad flaplike tooth which is concave on the posterior margin; the genital styles are broadly curved inward with the acute apices approximate; the aedeagus is a simple, elongate, coiled tube.
Umatac , May 28, on milo; Fadian , Aug. 19, on Pemphis ; Agat , May 31, on milo, all Swezey; Piti , April 30, Usinger.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ugyops samoaensis Muir
Metcalf, Z. P. 1946 |
Ugyops sulcata
Muir 1931: 70 |
Muir 1921: 573 |