Cyanopterus (Bracomorpha) transversus, Li & Achterberg & Chen, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1038.55258 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8FDAC6A3-30AB-4D33-9C00-9189A44FD8EE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/44660842-83FC-482F-A63F-C39DC3DEA589 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:44660842-83FC-482F-A63F-C39DC3DEA589 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cyanopterus (Bracomorpha) transversus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cyanopterus (Bracomorpha) transversus sp. nov. Figures 7 View Figure 7 , 8 View Figure 8
Material examined.
Holotype: ♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Mt. Tianmu , 23.VI.1984, Zhu Xiliang, No. 842005 (ZJUH) . Paratypes. 1♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Anji, Mt. Longwang , 31.VIII.1983, Chen Xuexin, No. 939811 (ZJUH) ; 1♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Mt. West Tianmu , 4.IX.1987, Chen Xuexin, No. 877070 (ZJUH) ; 1♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Songyang , 18-31.VII.1989, He Junhua, No. 895329 (ZJUH) ; 1♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Mt. West Tianmu , 3.IX.1987, Wang Xingeng, No. 876768 (ZJUH) ; 1♀, China, Henan Prov., Mt. Jigong , 11.VII.1997, Chen Xuexin, No. 973715 (ZJUH) ; 1♀, China, Fujian Prov., Mt. Meihua , 1000-1400m, 23-24.VII.1988, Fan Jinjiang, No. 886653 (ZJUH) .
Diagnosis.
This new species is very similar to C. (I.) bohayicus Belokobylskij, 2000 [Russia], but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: T I 1.0-1.1 × longer than apical width (1.35 × in C. (I.) bohayicus ); fore leg blackish brown (yellowish brown); triangular medio-basal area of T II gradually tapering apically (strongly tapering apically); ovipositor sheath 0.2-0.3 × as long as fore wing (0.4 ×).
Description.
Holotype, ♀, length of body 6.2 mm, of fore wing 6.5 mm, of ovipositor sheath 1.6 mm.
Head. Antenna with 55 antennomeres; apical antennomere acute, 2.4 × longer than its maximum width; third antennomere 1.6 × longer than its maximum width, 1.3 and 1.4 × longer than fourth and fifth antennomers, respectively, the latter 1.1 × longer than wide; malar suture with dense short setae (Fig. 8i View Figure 8 ); clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 3: 8: 5; clypeus with sparse long setae; eye weakly emarginated (Fig. 8g View Figure 8 ); face granulate, with dense and long setae (Fig. 8g View Figure 8 ); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 14: 17: 32; frons largely smooth, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a strong median groove (Fig. 8h View Figure 8 ); vertex smooth, but with short setae especially laterally; minimum distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: minimum distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 1: 1: 2; temples largely smooth except for a few weak punctures, with sparse setae, and directly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 8h View Figure 8 ).
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.5 × its height (Fig. 8c View Figure 8 ); notauli impressed in anterior half of mesoscutum (Fig. 8d View Figure 8 ); mesoscutum smooth, with some sparse setae (Fig. 8d View Figure 8 ); scutellar sulcus rather wide, moderately deep, and with crenulae (Fig. 8d View Figure 8 ); scutellum with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum strongly convex medially, and with a short median carina anteriorly (Fig. 8d View Figure 8 ); propodeum smooth, without longitudinal carinae or groove, with sparse setae medially, and with dense long setae laterally (Fig. 8d View Figure 8 ).
Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 8a View Figure 8 ): SR1: 3-SR: r = 42: 31: 7; 1-SR+M more or less straight, and 1.6 × longer than 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 13: 31: 11; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R ca. 80°; m-cu straight; 2-SR+M rather short; cu-a slightly postfurcal. Hind wing (Fig. 8b View Figure 8 ): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 31: 8: 17.
Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 25: 27: 41; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 33: 46: 18; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.7, 7.7 and 4.5 × their maximum width, respectively (Fig. 8f View Figure 8 ); hind tibial spurs 0.35 and 0.40 × as long as hind basitarsus.
Metasoma. Length of T I equal to its apical width, median area convex and coarsely sculptured (Fig. 8j View Figure 8 ); lateral grooves of T I strongly crenulate (Fig. 8j View Figure 8 ); T II largely sculptured except posteriorly (Fig. 8e View Figure 8 ); triangular medio-basal area of T II large and smooth, with some short oblique carinae laterally, and acute apically, but without medio-longitudinal carina; antero-lateral areas of T II developed and smooth, anterior grooves moderately wide and sparsely crenulate (Fig. 8e View Figure 8 ); second suture deep and crenulate, wide and straight medially, narrow laterally (Fig. 8e View Figure 8 ); T III-V with antero-lateral areas, and crenulate transverse subposterior groove (Fig. 8e View Figure 8 ); T III-VII largely smooth, and with sparse short setae; hypopygium acute apically, not reaching level of apex of metasoma; ovipositor sheath 0.2 × as long as fore wing.
Colour. Head largely black, mandible (except for apically) and maxillary palps basally yellowish brown, surrounding area of eyes reddish yellow (Fig. 8g, h View Figure 8 ); mesosoma largely reddish yellow (Fig. 8c View Figure 8 ), metanotum, metapleuron and propodeum black (Fig. 8c, d View Figure 8 ); legs, metasoma and ovipositor sheath black (Figs 7 View Figure 7 , 8e, f View Figure 8 ); wing membrane greyish brown, pterostigma and veins dark brown (Fig. 8a, b View Figure 8 ).
Variation. Length of body of female 5.6-6.5 mm, of fore wing of female 6.0-6.9 mm, and of ovipositor sheath 1.4-2.3 mm; ovipositor sheath 0.5-0.6 × as long as fore wing; length of mesosoma 1.4-1.7 × its height; length of T I 1.0-1.1 × its apical width; ovipositor sheath 0.2-0.3 × as long as fore wing; fore femur and tibia sometimes somewhat reddish yellow.
Biology.
Unknown.
Distribution.
China (Henan, Fujian, Zhejiang).
Etymology.
Named after the transverse head, especially so in dorsal view: transversus is Latin for transverse.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |