Ampithoe hinatore J.L. Barnard, 1972
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.733.14052 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:121ED460-2B81-4911-B147-A3D6AB04652D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/40EE1560-FC84-F02A-7C13-B7AC06F833DB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ampithoe hinatore J.L. Barnard, 1972 |
status |
|
Ampithoe hinatore J.L. Barnard, 1972 View in CoL
Ampithoe hinatore J.L. Barnard, 1972: 39-42, figs 11-12.
Type material.
Holotype: male, 9.0 mm, NIWA 831, station E970, Kaikoura, New Zealand, 42.417°S 173.700°E, intertidal wash of algae, 22 January, 1968.
Paratype: Female, 7.3 mm, 2 specimens, NIWA 832, station E970, Kaikoura, New Zealand, 42.417°S 173.700°E, intertidal wash of algae, 22 January, 1968.
Diagnosis.
Male: Eye prominent. Epistome and upper lip, in situ, directed straight down, perpendicular to the head. Lower lip outer plate notched, outer lobe extending past inner lobe. Mandible molar well developed and triturating, palp robust and three-articulate, article three distally rounded. Maxilla 1 palp well developed. Pereopods weakly setose. Gnathopod 1 weakly sexually dimorphic; coxa produced anteriorly; basis anteroventral lobe prominent; propodus subovoid, anterodistal setose lobe absent, palm acute and concave defined by a subacute posterodistal tooth and robust seta; dactylus subequal in length to palm. Gnathopod 2 more robust and slightly longer than gnathopod 1; basis anteroventral lobe large and setose; carpus subtriangular; propodus longer than carpus, propodus broad, anterodistal lobe absent, palm acute, defined by a subacute posterodistal tooth and robust seta; dactylus subequal in length to palm. Pereopods 3 and 4 similar in size and shape; basis slightly expanded and glandular; merus narrow, lobe absent. Pereopod 5 basis rounded; distal articles slender; propodus weakly prehensile. Pereopods 6 and 7 similar, increasing in length; distal articles slender; propodus weakly prehensile. Epimeron 3 posteroventral corner rounded without tooth. Uropod 1, in situ, reaching to the end of uropod 2, peduncle distoventral spur absent. Uropod 2 peduncle rounded lateral distoventral process absent. Uropod 3 broad, peduncle with six distal robust setae; rami short; outer ramus with two recurved robust setae, denticle patch; inner ramus with robust and slender distal setae. Telson subtriangular with reduced, small cusps, denticles absent, with lateral and apical setae.
Female. Similar to male, except: Gnathopods 1-2 palms less excavate.
Remarks.
Known only from the type locality, Kaikoura on the New Zealand, South Island north-eastern coast. J.L. Barnard (1972) recorded only three specimens, whilst Fenwick (1976) also noted the presence of this species in a wave exposure study, but in relatively small abundances (16 out of around 60,000 individuals). Barnard (1972) notes that it has a similar morphology to Ampithoe waialua Barnard, 1970 from Hawaii, which is also similar to the Ampithoe ramondi Audouin, 1826 complex of species. Lowry (1974) refers to the presence of Ampithoe hinatore from Kaikoura, however, these are not new records just repeats from Barnard’s paper.
Distribution.
Kaikoura, South Island, New Zealand
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |