Kingius Franz

Jałoszyński, Paweł, 2023, Scydmaenus Latreille of Australia: Revision of species in subgenera Choleropsis Franz, Kingius Franz, Mascarensia Franz, Parallomicrus Franz, Scottiscydmaenus Franz, and description of Ascydmaenus subgen. n. (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae), Zootaxa 5371 (1), pp. 1-75 : 30

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5371.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D60B50D1-280B-4403-9E5B-25C0704A43A1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10249319

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3E380C57-FFE8-4A5E-27AC-B2FBFA43E07F

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Kingius Franz
status

 

Subgenus Kingius Franz View in CoL

Kingius Franz View in CoL in Newton & Franz (1998): 153. New name for Heterognathus King, 1864 View in CoL .

Heterognathus King, 1864: 96 View in CoL . Preoccupied, not Girard (1854) (Pisces); not Schmarda (1859) (Rotifera), not Rey (1888) ( Coleoptera : Histeridae View in CoL ). Type species: Heterognathus carinatus King, 1864 (des. Franz, 1975: 274). Synonymized with Cholerus by Csiki, 1919; as synonym of Scydmaenus View in CoL in Fauvel, 1885: 182, but as separate subgenus in Franz (1975).

Emended diagnosis of Kingius . Scydmaenus with the following features: (1) antennal club virtually dimerous ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 78–79 ); (2) all flagellomeres symmetrical or nearly so ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 78–79 ); (3) submentum without lateral lobes ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 76–77 ); (4) pronotum with median longitudinal antebasal carina, lacking antebasal pits ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 76–77 ); (5) basisternal region of prosternum distinctly longer than procoxal rests ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 76–77 ); (6) elytra lacking basal foveae ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 76–77 ); mesocoxae narrowly separated by carinate mesoventral process, posteriorly fused with subtrapezoidal anterior metaventral process ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–79 ); (7) metanepisterna largely fused with metaventrite ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–79 ); (8) metaventral intermetacoxal process short and broad, with concave posterior margin, about as wide as one metacoxa; (9) male protarsi slightly broadened and with tenent setae on ventral surface of tarsomeres 1–3; and (10) aedeagus lacking lateral subapical lobes, with minute dorsal setae in apical region.

Remarks. King (1864) described the genus Heterognathus and defined it primarily by the asymmetrical mandibles: the right one with a bifid preapical tooth, and the left one with two teeth. He also described the maxillary palpomere 4 as “ minuto globoso ” (although “subglobose” would better match the dome-shaped structure), and several other characters, all matching world species of what is now recognized as Scydmaenus . Franz (1975) designated Heterognathus carinatus as the type species for the King’s genus, and placed Heterognathus as a subgenus of Scydmaenus . Franz’s (1975) diagnosis of Heterognathus (later replaced by Kingius ) was based on the characters found in the type species. However, he lists in one paragraph features that demonstrate that Heterognathus is identical with Scydmaenus , and at the same time those that justify placing H. carinatus in a separate subgenus. It is impossible to extract subgeneric diagnostic characters from this description. However, such a diagnosis can be compiled from the characters used in the identification key for subgenera of Scydmaenus given in Franz (1975) on p. 273. The Franz’s diagnosis includes: (1) pronotum with median longitudinal antebasal carina; (2) antennae with antennomeres 6–8 transverse and 9 small, and with only dimerous clubs; and (3) metanepisterna demarcated from metaventrite by a sharply marked suture. In fact, the last character was incorrect, as in Scydmaenus carinatus the metanepisterna are largely fused with the metaventrite ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–79 ), and a poorly visible suture delimiting these structures is developed only near anterior and posterior regions of the lateroventral metathorax. As a result, Kingius (= Heterognathus ) cannot be identified using the Franz’s key.

Composition, distribution and biology. Kingius includes only two endemic Australian species, S. carinatus (King) and S. formicarum Franz. Both have been collected with ants, but the ant species remains undetermined ( S. carinatus was found “in the nest of small black ants”, according to King (1864)).

Identification key to males and females of Scydmaenus (Kingius) View in CoL

1 Antennomere 10 distinctly transverse ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 78–79 ); BL> 1.7 mm .......................... Scydmaenus carinatus (King) View in CoL

- Antennomere 10 as long as broad ( Fig. 90 View FIGURES 90–94 ); BL <1.5 mm ........................... Scydmaenus formicarum Franz View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Loc

Kingius Franz

Jałoszyński, Paweł 2023
2023
Loc

Kingius

Newton, A. F. & Franz, H. 1998: 153
1998
Loc

Heterognathus

Franz, H. 1975: 274
Fauvel, A. 1885: 182
King, R. L. 1864: 96
1864
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF