Tylopus perarmatus Hoffman, 1973

Likhitrakarn, Natdanai, Golovatch, Sergei I., Prateepasen, Rujiporn & Panha, Somsak, 2010, Review of the genus Tylopus Jeekel, 1968, with descriptions of five new species from Thailand (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae), ZooKeys 72, pp. 23-68 : 36-38

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.72.744

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C8836F2-FACF-CB14-F417-2AF50B8CDE2E

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Tylopus perarmatus Hoffman, 1973
status

 

Tylopus perarmatus Hoffman, 1973 Figs 3438

Tylopus perarmatus Hoffman 1973: 372.

Tylopus perarmatus : Golovatch and Enghoff 1993: 106.

Tylopus perarmatus : Enghoff 2005: 99.

Material:

5 ♂, 3 ♀, 1 juv. (CUMZ), Thailand, Chiang Mai Province, Chom Thong District, Doi Inthanon National Park, Siriphum Waterfall, ca 1320 m, 18°32'49N, 98°30'57E, 13.10.2009, leg. S. Panha, J. Sutcharit & N. Likhitrakarn; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUMZ), same province, Wiang Kaen District, Doi Phatang, 25.10.2008, leg. S. Panha & J. Sutcharit; 5 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUMZ), Lampang Province, Ngao District, Thum Pha Thai, 23.10.2008, leg. S. Panha, J. Sutcharit & N. Likhitrakarn; 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUMZ), Chiang Rai Province, Mueang Chiang Rai District, Ban Pang Rim Kon, 10.07.2006, leg. S. Panha; 1 ♂ (CUMZ), same province, Thoeng District, Phucheefah, 10.07.2006, leg. S. Panha & J. Sutcharit; 2 ♂, 1 ♀ (CUMZ), same province, Wiang Kaen District, Doi Pha Tang, 10.07.2006; 1 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUMZ), Phayao Province, Chiang Kham District, Nam Min Waterfall, 23.10.2008, leg. S. Panha & J. Sutcharit; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUMZ), Phrae Province, Rong Kwang District, Tham Pha Nang Khoi, ca 280 m, 18°22'10N, 100°21'12E, 9.10.2009, leg. S. Panha, J. Sutcharit & N. Likhitrakarn; 2 ♂, 2 ♀ (CUMZ), same locality, 29.09.2010, leg. J. Sutcharit & P. Pimvichai; 9 ♂, 6 ♀, 2 juv. (CUMZ), Nan Province, Pua District, Ton Tong Waterfall, ca 1130 m, 19°12'36N, 101°4'14E, 10.10.2009, leg. S. Panha, J. Sutcharit & N. Likhitrakarn.

Remarks.

This species has long been known as perhaps the most widespread and common congener in northern Thailand, also showing considerable variation both in body texture and gonopod structure ( Golovatch and Enghoff 1993). The new samples add to this variation in the gonopods often with spine h rather narrow and spiniform to broadly denti- or lobiform, and spine z nearly straight to strongly unciform (Figs 34-38).