Rhimphoctona melanura (Holmgren, 1860)

Varga, Oleksandr, 2017, A review of the genus Rhimphoctona Förster, 1869 (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae) from the Ukrainian Carpathians, with a key to European species, Zootaxa 4263 (2), pp. 387-394 : 392

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4263.2.12

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0162EE29-88F7-4651-94E9-A1B57678C265

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6017473

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3C1B87FE-7039-1266-BAD9-351E2926F8AE

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Rhimphoctona melanura (Holmgren, 1860)
status

 

Rhimphoctona melanura (Holmgren, 1860) View in CoL

( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5 )

Material examined. No material examined from the Ukrainian Carpathians. Additional material: 1 female from ZSM collection.

Diagnosis. The female of this species is closely related to R. longicauda , but has parallel temples; more densely punctate mesopleuron ( Fig. 3. 2 View FIGURE 3 ); and propodeum with narrower distally area basalis ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 . 7). The male generally resembles female and has yellow face, part of temples, mesopleuron ventrally, and hind trochanters.

Distribution. Western Palaearctic ( Yu et al. 2012).

Remarks. Holmgren described this species after one female without location label and some males from Sweden. One female without label (a possible lectotype) could not be found neither in Stockholm nor Lund. The female lectotype designated by J. Aubert could not be considered as a syntype due to known location. Therefore, K. Hortmann chose the lectotype from Holmgrens’ material from Lund. Additionally, this female perfectly matches Holmgren’s female without location label. This is why known R. melanura females have to be renamed (see also R. longicauda ) ( Horstmann, 1980). Only one female specimen was found in the ZSM collection with relatively long ovipositor, which is about 1.4 × the length of hind tibia ( Horstmann (1980) stated only 1.2 ×). Therefore, the ovipositor length cannot be used as a reliable character for separating R. melanura and R. megacephalus . Furthermore, in some specimens with relatively short ovipositors (approx. 1.3 ×) area superomedia are wider than area basalis, but laterally with indistinct carinae ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 . 11), so it is difficult so say to which species, R. megacephalus or R. melanura , these specimens belong.

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF