Gilpinia pallida (Klug, 1812)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.69.84080 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B245B53-7156-4A3F-9667-2F2CD756779A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7019597 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B6FBF67-A592-5845-B575-168A46CE3485 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Gilpinia pallida (Klug, 1812) |
status |
|
Lophyrus pallidus Klug, 1812: 54-55. ♀, ♂. Syntypes. Type locality: Sweden and northern Germany. ZMHB.
Lophyrus catocalus Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1858: 276-277. ♀, ♂. Syntypes. Lectotype ♀ designated by Thomas (1987). Type locality: Netherlands, Groesbeek near Nijmegen. syn. nov.
Gilpinia catocala : Thomas (1987) recombination.
Gilpinia verticalis Gussakovskij, 1947: 154-155, 227-228. ♀, ♂. Syntypes. Type locality: localities in Poland, Latvia and Russia. Synonymy with G. catocala by Thomas (1987).
Notes.
Although we have not studied the lectotype of Lophyrus catocalus , the interpretation of its taxonomic status is possible after referring to Gussakovskij’s description of G. verticalis and the other publications cited above. We agree with Pschorn-Walcher (1982) and Viitasaari and Varama (1987) that the two forms are an expression of individual variability, linked to population differences with a geographical component. Accordingly, we treat Gilpinia catocala as a junior synonym of G. pallida .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gilpinia pallida (Klug, 1812)
Liston, Andrew, Mutanen, Marko, Heidemaa, Mikk, Blank, Stephan M., Kiljunen, Niina, Taeger, Andreas, Viitasaari, Matti, Vikberg, Veli, Wutke, Saskia & Prous, Marko 2022 |
Gilpinia verticalis
Gussakovskij 1947 |
Lophyrus catocalus
Snellen van Vollenhoven 1858 |
Lophyrus pallidus
Klug 1812 |