Apatura metis Freyer, 1829
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189163 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6218443 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3B4687E5-E253-B75C-FCEB-FA8FFAF3F9E8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Apatura metis Freyer, 1829 |
status |
|
Apatura metis Freyer, 1829 View in CoL
( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 3 – 10 )
Apatura metis Freyer, 1829: 61 View in CoL , pl. 67(1) [Type locality: “Süd-Ungarn”]; Fixsen, 1887: 292 ( ilia View in CoL var.); Lee, 1982: 73; Masui and Inomata, 1990: 6; Lee, 1992: 4; Korshunov and Gorbunov, 1995: 73; Tuzov et al., 2000: 14; Lee, 2005: 27.
Apatura ilia View in CoL var. bunea Herrich-Schäffer , [1845]: 45, pl. 36(161–163) [Type locality: Caucasus]; Fixsen, 1887: 292 ( ilia View in CoL ab.) (first record from Korea); Okamoto, 1924: 88 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Nakayama, 1932: 379 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Mori et al., 1934: 33 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 514 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1939b: 52 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Kim and Mi, 1956: 395 ( ilia View in CoL f.); Seok, 1973: 76 ( ilia View in CoL f.).
Apatura substituta Butler, 1873: 159 View in CoL [Type locality: northern China]; Leech, 1893: 162 ( ilia View in CoL var.); Moore, [1896]: 7 ( Potamis ).
Apatura ilia: Leech, 1887: 417 View in CoL ; Shin, 1975: 45; Takakura, 1981: 4 (nec Denis and Schiffermüller, 1775).
Apatura ilia View in CoL f. gertraudis Stichel, 1908: 163 [Type locality: “S. Russland ”]; Nakayama, 1932: 379 ( ilia View in CoL getrandis [sic]); Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 515 ( ilia View in CoL getrandis [sic]); Seok, 1939b: 54 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1942: 87; Seok and Umitatsu, 1942: 186; Kim and Mi, 1956: 395; Seok, 1973: 80; Lee, 1978: 40 ( metis View in CoL f.).
Apatura ilia View in CoL f. substituta: Stichel, 1908: 163 View in CoL ; Nire, 1918: 94 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Doi, 1919: 122 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Okamoto, 1924: 88 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Doi, 1928: 49 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Doi, 1931: 45 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Nakayama, 1932: 379 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1934: 718 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Mori et al., 1934: 33 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1936: 62 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 516 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1939a: 178 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1939b: 56 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1942: 87; Seok and Umitatsu, 1942: 186; Kim and Mi, 1956: 396 (substitua [sic]); Murayama, 1963: 43, 45 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1973: 86; Lee, 1978: 40 ( metis View in CoL f.); Okano, 1998: 6 ( metis View in CoL subsp.).
Apatura ilia View in CoL ab. mikuni Wileman, 1910: 93 View in CoL [Type locality: Mikuni View in CoL , Province of Bungo, Japan]; Nire, 1918: 95 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Doi, 1931: 45 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Nakayama, 1932: 379 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Seok, 1934: 717 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Mori et al., 1934: 33 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 515 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.); Shirôzu, 1938: 2 ( ilia View in CoL subsp.).
Apatura ilia heijona Matsumura, 1928: 198 View in CoL [Type locality: Corea]; Bollow, 1930: 194; Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 515; Inomata, 1982: xvii ( metis View in CoL subsp.); Masui and Inomata, 1990: 7, 9 ( metis View in CoL subsp.).
Apatura ilia metis: Doi, 1928: 49 View in CoL , 50; Maruda, 1929: 127; Nakayama, 1932: 379; Kishida and Nakamura, 1936: 515.
Apatura ilia View in CoL subsp.: Mori et al., 1934: 33.
Apatura mikuni: Seok, 1936: 62 View in CoL .
Apatura ilia gracilis Bang-Haas, 1936: 346 View in CoL [Type locality: “Charbin”, “Mandschurei”]; Masui and Inomata, 1990: 7, 9 ( metis View in CoL subsp.).
Subspecies. The Korean populations are considered to belong to subsp. substituta View in CoL as are the populations in northern China (type locality) and Far Eastern Russia. The Japanese populations are considered to belong to subsp. mikuni View in CoL . Some authors have treated the populations in Korea and the Amur and Ussuri regions as subsp. heijona (cf. Tuzov et al. 2000) or as the nominal subspecies (cf. Lee 1992). However, heijona is believed to be a variation within the range of subsp. substituta View in CoL .
Adult. Active from early June to mid July, late July to late August and early September to early October (two or three broods in central and southern Korea, but only one brood in high altitude areas). Both sexes often perch on the leaves, branches or stalks of their food trees. When sitting on a stalk, they frequently position themselves with their heads toward the ground. They also puddle and are attracted to carrion and fermenting fluids, and neither sex visits flowers. In the afternoon, males engage in hilltopping on trees standing on hills or lowlands.
Larval host plants. Recorded hosts include Salix gracilistyla Miq. , Salix babylonica L., Salix caprea L., etc. of the Salicaceae ( Joo et al. 1997) .
Life cycle. Not documented for the Korean populations. Usually the 3rd instar larvae hibernate on diverging points of two branches or in furrows of trunks of the food plants.
Distribution. Korea (including some adjacent islands of Incheon and Gyeonggi-do, but not on Jejudo Is.), northeastern China, Far Eastern Russia, Japan, southeastern Europe, southwestern Siberia and Kazakhstan.
Remarks. Apatura ilia and Apatura metis are often confused with each other because of their extreme similarity and confusing infraspecific variations. Moreover, intermediate forms between the two species occur at high frequency (perhaps as high as 10%; personal observation) in many areas where the two species are sympatric. For these reasons, these two species have long been treated as a single species in Korea as well as in many other countries of East Asia (cf. Seok 1939b). The Korean Apatura metis was treated as independent from Apatura ilia for the first time by Lee (1978).
Intermediate forms are thought to be natural hybrids between these two allied species. This has led to disputes over the taxonomic status of A. ilia and A. metis based on differing species criteria―some argue that occasional hybrids do not negate species status, while others argue that the currently observed rate of hybridization requires subspecific treatment of the forms (strict biological species concept), especially because of their morphological similarity. Here , A. ilia and A. metis are treated as valid species because they are often sympatric, they sometimes share the same plants, and they fly during somewhat different periods.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Apatura metis Freyer, 1829
Lee, Young June 2009 |
Apatura mikuni:
Seok 1936: 62 |
Apatura ilia gracilis
Masui 1990: 7 |
Bang-Haas 1936: 346 |
Apatura ilia
Mori 1934: 33 |
Apatura ilia heijona
Masui 1990: 7 |
Kishida 1936: 515 |
Bollow 1930: 194 |
Matsumura 1928: 198 |
Apatura ilia metis:
Kishida 1936: 515 |
Nakayama 1932: 379 |
Maruda 1929: 127 |
Doi 1928: 49 |
Apatura ilia
Shirozu 1938: 2 |
Kishida 1936: 515 |
Seok 1934: 717 |
Mori 1934: 33 |
Nakayama 1932: 379 |
Doi 1931: 45 |
Nire 1918: 95 |
Wileman 1910: 93 |
Apatura ilia
Lee 1978: 40 |
Seok 1973: 80 |
Kim 1956: 395 |
Seok 1942: 186 |
Seok 1939: 54 |
Kishida 1936: 515 |
Nakayama 1932: 379 |
Stichel 1908: 163 |
Apatura ilia
Okano 1998: 6 |
Lee 1978: 40 |
Seok 1973: 86 |
Murayama 1963: 43 |
Kim 1956: 396 |
Seok 1942: 186 |
Seok 1939: 178 |
Seok 1939: 56 |
Seok 1936: 62 |
Kishida 1936: 516 |
Seok 1934: 718 |
Mori 1934: 33 |
Nakayama 1932: 379 |
Doi 1931: 45 |
Doi 1928: 49 |
Okamoto 1924: 88 |
Doi 1919: 122 |
Nire 1918: 94 |
Stichel 1908: 163 |
Apatura ilia
Seok 1973: 76 |
Kim 1956: 395 |
Seok 1939: 52 |
Kishida 1936: 514 |
Mori 1934: 33 |
Nakayama 1932: 379 |
Okamoto 1924: 88 |
Fixsen 1887: 292 |
Herrich-Schäffer |
Apatura ilia:
Shin 1975: 45 |
Leech 1887: 417 |
Apatura substituta
Leech 1893: 162 |
Butler 1873: 159 |
Moore, [1896] : 7 |
Apatura metis
Lee 2005: 27 |
Tuzov 2000: 14 |
Korshunov 1995: 73 |
Lee 1992: 4 |
Masui 1990: 6 |
Lee 1982: 73 |
Fixsen 1887: 292 |
Freyer 1829: 61 |