Fidiobia Ashmead, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222931003632740 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A5187E1-FFBF-D804-FDFC-47DB8E47FAA6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fidiobia Ashmead, 1894 |
status |
|
Genus Fidiobia Ashmead, 1894 View in CoL
Fidiobia Ashmead, 1894: 170 View in CoL . Type species: Fidiobia flavipes Ashmead. View in CoL
Rosneta Brues, 1908: 157 . Type species Rosneta tritici Brues. Synonymized by Fouts, 1924.
Triclavus Brèthes, 1916: 411 . Type species: Triclavus bonariensis Brèthes. Synonymized by Masner [Muesebeck and Masner in Krombein and Burks (1967)].
Fahringeria Kieffer, 1921: 68 . Type species: Fahringeria synergorum Kieffer. Synonymized by Masner and Huggert, 1989.
Platyllotropa Szelényi 1938: 126 . Type species: Platyllotropa gallicola Szelényi. Synonymized with Triclavus Brèthes by Oglobin, 1944.
Diagnosis
Minute species with body slightly to considerably depressed dorsoventrally; mostly melanic, with brightly coloured appendages; vertex rounded without hyperoccipital carina. OOL variable, but in most species very short, equal to or shorter than diameter of posterior ocellus; antenna 9- or 10-segmented, in females with abrupt, threesegmented clava; clava slightly less abrupt in males. Mesoscutum flattened; notauli (if present) incomplete, abbreviated anteriorly, gradually dilated posteriorly. Forewing in most species with short tubular submarginal vein. T2 the largest tergite, with two depressions anterolaterally.
The ovipositor of Fidiobia ( Figure 2 View Figure 2 ), like the ovipositor of all platygastrids, is of Ceratobaeus- type (Austin and Field 1997). We have made some observations about the ovipositor in F. rugosifrons ( Figure 2C View Figure 2 ) and in F. hispanica ( Figure 2A,B View Figure 2 ) because these two species differ fundamentally in the structure of the metasoma. We assumed that the ovipositor of F. hispanica is longer than that of F. rugosifrons . In reality the ovipositor assemblies of the two species are of equal length, but in the ovipositor system of F. hispanica the tubular membranous, abdominal segment 9 can be extruded. Because of this membranous tube, the ovipositor system of F. hispanica is about twice as long as that of F. rugosifrons , even if the ovipositor assembly is of similar length in the two species.
Key to European species of Fidiobia View in CoL
1. Antenna 10-segmented.......................................... 2 Antenna nine-segmented........................................ 3 2. Mesoscutum with notauli; OOL 3–4.1 times length of diameter of posterior ocellus; medial prominence of T1 with coarse, longitudinal ridges; T2 covered with a substrigulate sculpture on four-fifths of its surface
.............................................. F. gordoni sp. nov. Mesoscutum without notauli; OOL 2–2.2 times length of diameter of posterior ocellus; medial prominence of T1, smooth; T2 smooth and shiny, without sculpture.................................. F. hispanica sp. nov. 3. Mesoscutum without notauli..................................... 4 Mesoscutum with notauli........................................ 5 4. Body flat, strongly depressed dorsoventrally; width of mesosoma 2.7 times height; head strongly transverse, width of head 2.5–3 times length; length of metasoma 1.9–2.1 times length of mesosoma, and 2.4–2.8 times width; OOL 1.5–2 times length of diameter of posterior ocellus
..................................... F. synergorum ( Kieffer, 1921) Body moderately depressed dorsoventrally; width of mesosoma 1.4 times height; head transverse, at most 2.5 times as wide as long; length of metasoma 1.4 times length of mesosoma and 1.4 times its width; OOL equal to diameter of posterior ocellus...................... F. polita Buhl, 1998 View in CoL 5. Pronotum strongly developed, clearly visible in dorsal view, length of pronotum almost 0.5 times length of mesoscutum; OOL 0.7 times length of diameter of posterior ocellus; females brachypterous......... F. pronotata Szabó, 1958 Pronotum View in CoL weakly developed, hardly visible in dorsal view............. 6 6. Vertex, occiput and mesoscutum areolate–rugulose; T1 convex, with distinct medial prominence with few, delicate, longitudinal costae; in anterior quarter, sides of T1 are almost parallel.......... F. rugosifrons Crawford, 1916 View in CoL Vertex, occiput and mesoscutum with a very faint, barely perceptible imbricate sculpture; T1 convex, with distinct medial prominence smooth and lustrous, without costae; T1 almost trapezoidal....... F. hofferi Kozlov, 1978 View in CoL
Description of species of Fidiobia
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Fidiobia Ashmead, 1894
details, Publication, authors, including instructions for, information, subscription, http, www. tandfonline. com, loi & tnah 20 2010 |
Platyllotropa Szelényi 1938: 126
Szelenyi G 1938: 126 |
Fahringeria
Kieffer JJ 1921: 68 |
Triclavus Brèthes, 1916: 411
Brethes J 1916: 411 |
Rosneta
Brues CT 1908: 157 |
Fidiobia
Ashmead WH 1894: 170 |