Eucyclops festivus Lindberg, 1955
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2015.1061715 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F320DE0-FF96-4E5F-8520-586303082E09 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332585 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/397AD47D-FFE9-FFD2-A68A-FB16FBAA7632 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Eucyclops festivus Lindberg, 1955 |
status |
|
Eucyclops festivus Lindberg, 1955
( Figures 14 – 21 View Figure 14 View Figure 15 View Figure 16 View Figure 17 View Figure 18 View Figure 19 View Figure 20 View Figure 21 )
Description
Female. Habitus as in Figure 16A View Figure 16 . Average body length excluding caudal setae = 866 µm. Body surface (including caudal rami) ornamented with small pits. Prosome representing 59% of total body length. Prosomal fringes serrate dorsally. Urosomal fringes strongly serrate. Genital double somite symmetrical ( Figure 16B View Figure 16 ), representing 10.8% of total body length; proximal third of genital double somite slightly expanded laterally. Seminal receptacle with rounded lateral arms on posterior margin, typical of the serrulatus -complex. Length/width of caudal rami = 4.6; inner margin of caudal ramus smooth; outer margin with strong spinules covering 61% with respect to the total length of ramus. Dorsal seta (VII) 0.5 times as long as caudal ramus and 0.6 times as long as outermost caudal seta (III). Ratio of innermost caudal seta (VI)/outermost caudal seta (III) = 1.0. Lateral caudal seta (II) inserted at 74% of caudal ramus.
Antennule ( Figures 14B View Figure 14 , 16E–F View Figure 16 , 17A View Figure 17 ). Tip reaching second pediger, antennules ornamented with pits. Armature per segment as follows: 1(8s), 2(4s), 3(2s), 4(6s), 5(4s), 6(1s+1sp), 7(2s), 8(3s), 9(2s+1ae), 10(2s), 11(3s), 12(7s+1ae). Transverse rows of spinules on first segment not observed. Spine on sixth segment reaching midlength of seventh antennular segment.
Antenna ( Figures 14C–D View Figure 14 , 17B–D View Figure 17 ). Coxa (unarmed), basis (2s+Exp), plus threesegmented Enp (1s, 9s, 7s, respectively). Basis with rows of spinules on frontal surface:
N1(V), N2(3), N3(5), N4(5), N5(8), N6(10), N15(4), N17 (12), N18(3) and on caudal surface: N7(4), N8(5), N9 + 10(8), N11(4), N12(6), N13(5), N14(8), N16(5), N22(10). Caudal surface of first Enp with B2 (5).
Leg 1 ( Figures 15A–B View Figure 15 , 17F View Figure 17 ). Frontal surface of intercoxal sclerite with row I armed with hair-like elements arranged in semicircular pattern, caudal surface with rows I and II bearing minute spinules. Inner coxal seta biserially setulated, caudal coxal surface with spinule formula = A-B-C. Inner basal seta (basipodal spine) reaching middle margin of
Enp3, 0.8 times as long as Enp. Length/width ratio Enp3 = 1.4, apical spine of Enp3 being 1.2 times as long as Enp3.
Leg 2 ( Figures 15C–D View Figure 15 , 18A–B View Figure 18 ). Frontal surface of intercoxal sclerite with row I bearing hair-like elements arranged in a circular pattern; caudal surface with row I discontinuous, bearing 7 – 9 small spinules on each side, row II continuous with 24 – 30 small spinules. Distal margin of intercoxal sclerite with two rounded, chitinised projections. Inner coxal seta biserially setulated, caudal coxal surface with spinule formula A-B-C-D.
Length/width ratio of Enp3 = 2, apical spine of Enp3 1.2 times as long as Enp3. No modified setae present.
Leg 3 ( Figures 15E–F View Figure 15 , 18C–D View Figure 18 ). Frontal surface of intercoxal sclerite armed with group of long hairs on each side; caudal surface with row I bearing long hairs and with a small gap in the middle, row II continuous bearing 30 – 32 small spinules and row III continuous bearing 32 – 37 spinules. Distal margin with two rounded, chitinised projections. Coxa with strong, biserially setulated inner coxal seta, basally with long hairs and distally with
strong spinules along both margins. Caudal coxal surface with spinule formula = A-B-C. Length/width ratio of Enp3 = 1.9, apical spine of Enp3 as long as segment (Enp3). No modified setae present.
Leg 4 ( Figures 15G–H View Figure 15 , 18F View Figure 18 , 19A View Figure 19 ). Distal margin of intercoxal sclerite with two low, rounded, chitinised projections. Frontal surface of sclerite with row I bearing long slender spinules arranged in a semicircular pattern on both sides of surface. Caudal surface of intercoxal sclerite with row I with seven strong spinules on each side and with a small gap in the middle margin; row II continuous, with strong spinules, outer margins bearing more spinules than medial margin; and row III divided into three sections, two on outer margins with strong and long spinules and medial margin with 3 – 4 long spinules. Frontal surface of coxa with row of small spinules at insertion of Bsp. Inner coxal spine with heterogeneous ornamentation; inner margin with long hairs on proximal section and strong spinules distally; outer edge with one distal spinule and proximal hair-like elements, gap in the middle margin. Length/width ratio Enp3 = 2.5, length ratio inner spine of Enp3/length Enp3 = 1.2; length ratio outer spine of Enp3/ length Enp3 = 0.9; proportion inner/outer spines Enp3 = 1.3. Lateral seta of Enp3 inserted at 68% of segment. No modified setae in Enp and Exp.
Leg 5 ( Figure 19B View Figure 19 ). Free segment subrectangular, 2.1 times longer than wide, bearing one strong inner spine and two setae; medial seta 1.8 times longer than outer seta and 1.6 times longer than inner spine. Inner spine twice longer than segment.
Remarks. As mentioned by Gutiérrez-Aguirre et al. (2013), E. festivus has been recorded in north and central Mexico and recently also from a pond in the state of Chiapas in southeast Mexico. This species appears to be related to E. estherae sp. nov. and E. wixarica sp. nov., both described herein. Differences among these species are presented in the remarks sections of E. wixarica sp. nov. and E. estherae sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |