Acritini, Wenzel, 1944
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1157.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF5DD766-135E-4627-A8C7-14899E32C0EA |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3971F007-FFB3-3D32-044D-BAB1FCFFC2AE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acritini |
status |
|
Tribe Acritini View in CoL
22. Acritus (Acritus) alutaceus Thérond ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Distribution: Chad, Ghana, Namibia, Botswana, Republic of South Africa, Kenya, Yemen ( Gomy 2004).
Chorology: Afrotropical (widespread).
Literature. Yemen: Wadi Sharez [a few km east of Hajjah, 15°41’36”N 43°36’11”E], II.1985, cow dung, 1 ♀ ( Gomy 2004); ibidem, 24.III.1985, 1 ♂ ( Gomy 2004); Al Kowd [= Al Kawd, 13°05’19”N 45°21’53”E], IX.2003, light trap, 2 ex. ( Gomy 2004). 23. Halacritus beneteaui Gomy ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Distribution: North Yemen, Djibouti, Eritrea ( Gomy 2003).
CHOROLOGY: Afrotropical (spread in E Africa).
Literature. Yemen: Red Sea coast near Hodeida [= Al Hudaydah, 14°47’52”N 42°57’08”E], 14.III.1938, 7 ex. [ Müller 1954, as Acritus (Halacritus) alutiger Wenzel ]; Hodeidah [= Al Hudaydah, 14°47’52”N 42°57’08”E], Russians’ beach, I.1970, under algae, 5 ex. ( Gomy 1978).
Notes. Five specimens of those determined by Müller as Acritus (Halacritus) alutiger are actually deposited in Müller’s collection at the Museum of Natural History of Trieste ( Italy). One of us (Pierpaolo Vienna) has revised them and so he has been able to state that they belong to Halacritus beneteaui .
24. Halacritus condenti Gomy ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 )
Distribution: Comoro Is., Kenya, Sudan, Eritrea, North Yemen, Djibouti, Somalia.
Chorology: Afrotropical (spread in E Africa).
Literature. Yemen: Red Sea coast near Hodeida [= Al Hudaydah, 14°47’52”N 42°57’08”E], 14.III.1938, 2 ex. [ Müller 1954, as Acritus (Halacritus) algarum ]; Hodeidah [= Al Hudaydah, 14°47’52”N 42°57’08”E], 9.X.1902, 2 ex. ( Gomy 1978, as H. algarum ; Gomy 1989,); ibidem, 27.I.1951, 4 ex. ( Gomy 1989); ibidem, beach, I.1970, under algae, 7 ex. ( Gomy 1978, as H. algarum ; Gomy 1989).
Notes. We think that the two specimens ascribed to Acritus (Halacritus) algarum by Müller (1954) must be regarded as H. condenti , even though we did not examine them. Our opinion is based on the confusion between the two species, as clearly demonstrated by Gomy (1989), and moreover on the presence in Müller’s collection of nine specimens of H. condenti (det. P. Vienna) from Eritrea (Assab, 11.I.1929), determined as A. algarum by Müller himself.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |