Crematogaster bakeri
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.186855 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:85FC2E42-200C-4102-899E-5684317234EA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6219387 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/394D9466-FFC2-FFFB-32E2-09332AA43BA0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Crematogaster bakeri |
status |
|
Key to species based on the worker caste (except for C. bakeri View in CoL , which is incertae sedis.)
1 Propodeal spines developed and with pointed apices................................................................................................... 2
- Propodeal spines undeveloped and forming obtuse lobes ............................................................................................ 4
2 Antennal club 3-jointed. Pronotum raised steeply toward mesonotum in lateral view ................................ mucronata View in CoL
- Antennal club 4-jointed. Pronotum raised moderately toward mesonotum in lateral view ......................................... 3
3 In lateral view, pronotum and mesonotum forming a single convexity, propodeum distinctly raised relative to prome- sonotum, metanotal groove deep ......................................................................................................................... vacca
- In lateral view, pronotum and mesonotum forming a single convexity, propodeum slightly raised relative to prome- sonotum, metanotal groove less deep .................................................................................................. yamanei sp. nov.
4 Dorsal median portion of head swollen ................................................................................................ tanakai sp. nov.
- Dorsal median portion of head not swollen .................................................................................................................. 5
5 Propodeal spiracle situated near the metapleural gland orifice, the distance between them about the same as the propodeal spiracle diameter ( Fig. 4) ............................................................................................................................. 6
- Propodeal spiracle situated away from the metapleural gland orifice, the distance between them much greater than the propodeal spiracle diameter ( Fig. 3) ....................................................................................................................... 9
6 Clypeus smooth and shining without longitudinal rugulae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 − 2 ) ..................................................................... inflata View in CoL
- Clypeus striated with rugulae ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 − 2 ) .......................................................................................................................... 7
7 Dorsal face of head strongly striated with abundant longitudinal rugulae. Scape not reaching posterior corner of head in large workers. Workers with pronounced size polymorphism .......................................................................... aurita View in CoL
- Dorsal face of head not strongly striated with longitudinal rugulae. Scape reaching posterior corner of head. Workers monomorphic in size..................................................................................................................................................... 8
8 The posterior portion of pronotum with transverse rugulae in dorsal view ( Fig. 6) .................................. physothorax
- The posterior portion of pronotum without distinct rugulae in dorsal view ( Fig. 7) .......................................... onusta View in CoL
9 Dorsal setae on posterior portion of fourth abdominal tergite directed medially ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8 − 9 ) ................................ difformis View in CoL
- Dorsal setae on fourth abdominal tergite directed posteriorly ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8 − 9 )....................................................................... 10
10 In lateral view, dorsal profile of promesonotum convex, propodeum distinctly raised relative to promesonotum, metanotal groove very deep ................................................................................................................................ sewardi
- In lateral view, dorsal profile of promesonotum convex, propodeum slightly raised relative to promesonotum, metanotal groove not so deep in dorsal median portion ................................................................................ ampullaris View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |