Marphysa merchangensis, Che Engku Abdullah & Idris & Fahmi & Flaxman & Hutchings, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1204.117261 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0704A2BB-6173-44BD-A1F7-CB3EDCFDC5DC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11479292 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/37BB3E05-77F6-50AD-9CA2-0FA6E8FDE9F4 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Marphysa merchangensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov.
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 8 View Figure 8 , 9 View Figure 9 , 10 View Figure 10
Material examined.
Holotype. UMTAnn 2149 , complete, antero-ventrally dissected, some parapodia mounted for SEM GoogleMaps . Paratypes. AM W. 54044 , complete, some parapodia mounted for SEM. LACM-AHF 13494 to 13496, complete, some parapodia removed; ZRC. ANN. 1604 to 1606, complete, some parapodia removed; SAM-MB-A 096021, complete, some parapodia removed GoogleMaps . All material was collected from the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia, Terengganu, Merchang GoogleMaps mangrove estuary (05 ° 01.393 ' N, 103 ° 17.994 ' E), October 2021.
Diagnosis.
Prostomium completely bilobed, five prostomial appendages without articulations; eyes present. Peristomium without peristomial cirri. Maxillary apparatus with four pairs of maxillae, an unpaired on the left side, MI with falcal arch extended at sub-right angle, basal outer edge arched, basal inner edge lacking curvature. MII with triangular teeth and without attachment lamella. MIII slightly curved, with equal-sized triangular teeth, without attachment lamella. MIV with rectangular and curved attachment lamella. Branchiae distributed along entire body. Dorsal cirri without articulations; postchaetal lobe well developed in anterior regions. Ventral cirri with swollen, inflated base. Sub-aciculae black, blunt, and translucent at distal end, pale brown in posterior-most parapodia. Supra-acicular chaetae include limbate, pectinate thin, narrow isodont with short and slender inner teeth, pectinate thick, wide isodont with short or long and slender inner teeth, and pectinate thick, narrow and wide anodont with long and thick inner teeth. Subacicular chaetae include only compound spinigers. Subacicular hook unidentate throughout chaetigers. Pygidium with two pairs of anal cirri, without articulation.
Description
(based on holotype, with variation in parentheses for paratypes). Preserved specimen beige (Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ), 257 (165–294) chaetigers, 94 mm (37–144 mm) long, L 10 - 5.25 mm (3.45–5.85 mm), W 10 - 2.85 mm (1.95–3.15 mm), excluding parapodia. Anterior region of body with dorsum convex and flat ventrum, without groove (Fig. 8 A View Figure 8 ); body depressed from chaetiger 25, elongated and tapering at distal end. Live specimens pink with red branchiae (Fig. 10 D View Figure 10 ).
Prostomium bilobed, anteriorly rounded with two dorsoventrally flattened lobes with an anterior notch between them (Fig. 8 A, B View Figure 8 ). Prostomial appendages in a semicircle, median antenna isolated by a gap (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ). Palps reach middle of second peristomial ring; lateral antennae reaching chaetiger 2; median antenna reaching chaetiger 3. Palpophores and ceratophores ring-shaped, short, and thick; palpostyles and ceratostyles tapering, and slender. Prostomial appendage peduncles absent. A pair of faded brown eyes present at posterior base of prostomium, between palps and lateral antennae (Fig. 8 B View Figure 8 ). Peristomium larger and wider than prostomium; first ring is 2.5 × longer than second ring, separation between rings distinct on all sides.
Maxillae pale brown (Fig. 8 C View Figure 8 ), and maxillary formula as follows: MF = 1 + 1, 5 (4–5) + 5 (5–6), 7 (6–7) + 0, 4 (4–5) + 8 (5–8), 1 + 1. Maxillary carrier ~ 2.5 × shorter than MI, rectangular anteriorly, triangular posteriorly. MI forceps-like, without attachment lamellae, falcal arch extended at sub-right angle, basal outer edge arched, basal inner edge lacking a curvature. Closing system ~ 3 × shorter than MI. Ligament between MI and MII pale brown. MII without attachment lamella, teeth triangular, distributed on <1 / 2 length of the plate. Ligament between MII and MIII pale brown. MIII single, longer than left MIV slightly curved, with equal-sized triangular teeth, without attachment lamella. Left MIV short (<1 / 2 the size of right MIV) with rectangular attachment lamellae. Right MIV long with curved attachment lamellae, teeth triangular, decreasing in size and teeth curved posteriorly. MV paired. Mandible pale brown, with concentric stripes, longer than MI; cutting plates whitish (Fig. 8 D View Figure 8 ).
First few parapodia located ventrolaterally but gradually becoming dorsolateral in subsequent segments. Chaetal lobes rounded in anterior and posterior chaetigers, conical in median chaetigers (Fig. 8 E – G View Figure 8 ). Prechaetal lobe shorter than chaetal lobe throughout body. Postchaetal lobe digitiform in first three chaetigers then rounded thereafter; longer than chaetal lobe in median chaetigers onwards, become shorter and absent in the posterior-most chaetigers. Dorsal cirri digitiform and slender, longer than ventral cirri anteriorly, slightly longer or similar from mid-body towards posterior-most chaetigers (Fig. 8 E – G View Figure 8 ). Ventral cirri thumb-shaped with rounded wide tips in first few chaetigers, basally inflated with digitiform tip from chaetiger 15, and gradually becoming conical posteriorly (Fig. 8 E – G View Figure 8 ). Branchiae pectinate, from chaetiger 24 (16–27) and continuing to last ~ 10 chaetigers, branchial filaments 4 × longer than dorsal cirri where best developed; number of filaments increasing from three anteriorly to six in mid-body, decreasing to one in last several chaetigers.
Notoaciculae absent, neuroaciculae black, blunt, and translucent at distal end along most of body, pale brown in posterior-most parapodia; ~ 2 or 3 per parapodium in anterior, one per parapodium in median and posterior chaetigers (Fig. 8 E – G View Figure 8 ). Supra-acicular chaetae with limbate capillaries and pectinates. Five types of pectinate chaetae present (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) (see Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ): type 1: thin, narrow isodont with 7–12 short and slender inner teeth, outer teeth longer, but with varying lengths, present in anterior and median body region (Fig. 9 A, B View Figure 9 ); type 4: thick, wide isodont with 12–15 short and slender inner teeth, present only in median and posterior region (Fig. 9 C View Figure 9 ); type 5: thick, wide isodont, with 15–18 long and slender inner teeth, only present in posterior region (Fig. 9 D View Figure 9 ); type 6: thick, narrow anodont with 11 or 12 long thick teeth, only present in posterior region (Fig. 9 E View Figure 9 ); type 8: thick, wide anodont, with five inner long and thick teeth, only present in the posterior region (Fig. 9 F View Figure 9 ). Subacicular chaetae with compound spinigers (Fig. 9 G View Figure 9 ). Subacicular hooks pale brown, translucent at distal end, emerge from chaetiger 37 (26–42) and then present on all chaetigers, one per parapodium; subacicular hooks unidentate throughout chaetigers (Fig. 9 H View Figure 9 ). Pygidium with crenulated margin, with two pairs of tapering pygidial cirri attached to ventral side of pygidium, dorsal pair ~ 4 × longer than ventral (Fig. 8 H View Figure 8 ).
Etymology.
The name denotes the type locality (Merchang estuary) where the specimens were collected.
Type locality.
South China Sea, Malaysia, east coast of Peninsular, Terengganu, Merchang mangrove estuary (see Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality and Setiu Wetlands, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Habitat.
Gravelly and slightly gravelly sand (Table 4 View Table 4 ), burrowing in decayed roots of the mangrove E. agallocha (Malay: Bebuta) (Fig. 10 A – C View Figure 10 ), burrowing in the sediments within an area populated with Talipariti tiliaceum (Fig. 13 C View Figure 13 ) with salinity 26 ‰ during spring low tide.
Remarks.
With the presence of only compound spinigers along the whole body and branchiae along most of the body, Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. belongs to the Marphysa Group B (Sanguinea). Other Marphysa species from Sanguinea-group occurring in the same water body (South China Sea) as M. merchangensis sp. nov. are M. setiuense sp. nov., M. hongkongensa Wang, Zhang & Qiu, 2018 (type locality: Hong Kong), M. iloiloensis Glasby, Mandario, Burghardt, Kupriyanova, Gunton & Hutchings, 2019 (type locality: Philippines), M. multipectinata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 (type locality: Shimen, Taiwan of China), M. orientalis Treadwell, 1936 (type locality: Xiamen, China), M. tribranchiata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 (type locality: Wanli, Taiwan of China), and M. tripectinata Liu, Hutchings & Sun, 2017 (type locality: Beihai, China).
Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. is similar to M. setiuense sp. nov. in having a pair of eyes and the absence of peduncle on the prostomial appendages. However, they can be differentiated by the number of types of pectinate chaetae, maxillary formula, chaetiger on which the branchiae and subacicular hooks occur, shape of dorsal cirri, chaetal lobes and subacicular hooks. Number of types of pectinate chaetae in M. merchangensis sp. nov. is five (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8), whereas in M. setiuense sp. nov. there are four (types 1, 2, 7, 8), and they lack the thick, wide isodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 5). Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. (L 10: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm) has more denticles on MIII 7 (6–7) + 0 compared to M. setiuense sp. nov. (L 10: 2.7 (2.85–4.8) mm) which has MIII: 5 (4–6) + 0. Branchiae and subacicular hook of M. merchangensis sp. nov. occur later (chaetiger 24 (16–27) and 37 (26–42 )), respectively) compared to M. setiuense sp. nov., where they occur from chaetiger 20 (15–25) and 25 (21–38), respectively. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has digitiform dorsal cirri along the whole body, while M. setiuense sp. nov. has both thumb-shaped and digitiform dorsal cirri. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has rounded shaped chaetal lobe in the anterior and posterior, and conical in the median region, whereas M. setiuense sp. nov. has rounded chaetal lobes on all parapodia. Finally, M. merchangensis sp. nov. has unidentate subacicular hook, whereas M. setiuense sp. nov. has unidentate and a few bidentate subacicular hooks present in posterior chaetigers.
Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. and M. hongkongensa can be differentiated by the presence or absence of eyes, number of types of pectinate chaetae, maximum number of branchial filaments, and the shape of subacicular hooks. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has a pair of eyes but they are absent in M. hongkongensa . Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has five types of pectinate chaetae (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) compared to four types present in M. hongkongensa (types 1, 2, 7, 8). Marphysa hongkongensa lacks thick, wide isodont and thick, narrow anodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 5, 6) which are present in the new species. The maximum number of branchial filaments in M. merchangensis sp. nov. (L 10: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm) is six and they begin from chaetiger 24 (16–27) whereas M. hongkongensa (L 10: 3.3–7 mm) has a maximum of ten branchial filaments, beginning from chaetiger 15–35. Finally, M. merchangensis sp. nov. only has unidentate subacicular hooks while both unidentate and bidentate subacicular hooks are present in M. hongkongensa .
Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. is similar to M. iloiloensis and M. multipectinata in having a pair of eyes. However, they can be distinguished by the number of types of pectinate chaetae present, the chaetiger on which branchiae and subacicular hooks occur, number of branchial filaments, shape of subacicular hooks and the maxillae formula. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has five types of pectinate chaetae (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8) whereas M. iloiloensis and M. multipectinata have three (types 1, 4, 6) and four (types 1, 4, 7, 8) respectively. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. and M. iloiloensis have the same type of pectinate branchiae (beginning on the same chaetiger with different range of variation) (chaetiger 24 (16–27) for the new species, and chaetiger 19 (16–20) for M. iloiloensis ). The maximum number of branchial filaments in M. merchangensis sp. nov. (TL: 94 (37–144) mm) is six, while M. iloiloensis (TL: 99 (95–165 +) mm) has a maximum of seven branchial filaments. Marphysa multipectinata (L 10: 13.9 mm) has palmate branchiae with maximum of five branchial filaments from chaetiger 32. Finally, all these species have different formulae for MII, MIII and MIV (see Table 6 View Table 6 ).
The other species from the Sanguinea complex, M. tribranchiata and M. tripectinata differ from M. merchangensis sp. nov. by the absence of eyes. Both M. tribranchiata and M. tripectinata have three types of pectinate chaetae, whereas M. merchangensis sp. nov. has five types. Marphysa tribranchiata lacks thick, wide isodont and thick, narrow anodont pectinate chaetae (types 4, 6), while M. tripectinata lacks thin, narrow isodont pectinate chaetae (type 1) which are present in the new species (types 1, 4, 5, 6, 8). While M. merchangensis sp. nov. and M. tripectinata only have unidentate subacicular hooks, they begin much later (chaetiger 170) in the latter species. Marphysa tribranchiata has both unidentate and bidentate subacicular hooks whereas only unidentate hooks are present in M. merchangensis sp. nov. The maximum number of branchiae filaments present in M. tribranchiata (L 10: 8.7 mm) and M tripectinata (L 10: 12.7 mm) are three and eight respectively, differs from M. merchangensis sp. nov. (L 10: 5.25 (3.45–5.85) mm), which has a maximum of six.
Finally, M. merchangensis sp. nov. is similar to M. orientalis by having unidentate subacicular hooks. Marphysa merchangensis sp. nov. has a pair of eyes and two pairs of anal cirri, while M. orientalis has no eyes and only one pair of anal cirri. Also, branchiae in M. merchangensis sp. nov. begin earlier from chaetiger 24 (16–27) compared to M. orientalis (chaetiger 45). The maximum number of branchial filaments in M. merchangensis sp. nov. is six, while M. orientalis has a maximum of three branchial filaments. Nevertheless, the original description of M. orientalis is incomplete and does not include certain important features such as the number and type of pectinate chaetae. Fresh material of M. orientalis should be collected and redescribed from the type locality at Gulf of Mannar, Sri Lanka.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.