Rubus novorossicus Doweld, 2017
Doweld, Alexander B., 2017, New names of fossil Rubus (Rosaceae), Phytotaxa 326 (4), pp. 279-283 : 281
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.326.4.8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/375E87E4-FFF6-FFA9-FF05-FC982AF2FA35 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rubus novorossicus Doweld |
status |
nom. nov. |
Rubus novorossicus Doweld , nom. nov.
Replaced name:— Rubus aralioides Negru (1986: 100 , pl. 17, figs. 15–18), nom. illeg. non Rubus aralioides Hance (1884: 42) ( McNeill et al. 2012, Art. 53.1).
Type:—15-20ПК (Grădina Botanică (Institut), Academiei de Ştiinţe a Moldovei, ChiȘinău, Moldova) – figured by Negru (1986: pl. 17, fig. 15).
Geography:—Bol’shoj Fontan (11 Station), near Odessa, Ukraine.
Stratigraphy:—Upper Miocene (Maeotian= Tortonian).
Status:—Fruits.
Eponymy:—From the name of New Russia (Novorossija), locus classicus.
IFPNI registration record:— FDB72262-F9D4-448A-9B53-5A206344E9F1.
Note:—The fossil-species Rubus aralioides Negru (1986: 100) was described on the basis of fossil fruits from Maeotian (Upper Miocene = Tortonian) sediments of the Black Sea region (near Odessa, Ukraine) with no analogues among living species of Rubus . However, it is a later illegitimate homonym of the extant species Rubus aralioides Hance (1884: 42) ( McNeill et al. 2012, Art. 53.1), and therefore, being in current use, the fossil-species is renamed here as Rubus novorossicus Doweld , nom. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |