Pyrrhalta meihuai, Lee & Bezděk, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1039.64740 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3487C357-0FAC-4907-A5C0-C0A0C801C6E3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0D75E209-97C3-4F69-A865-B056DAE8BF64 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0D75E209-97C3-4F69-A865-B056DAE8BF64 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pyrrhalta meihuai |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pyrrhalta meihuai sp. nov. Figs 17E, F View Figure 17 , 18D-F View Figure 18 , 22 View Figure 22
Types.
Holotype ♂ (TARI), Taiwan. Ilan: Mingchi (明池), 2.V.2009, leg. M.-H. Tsou. Paratypes. 3♂, 3♀ (TARI), same data as holotype; 1♂, 3♀ (TARI), same but with “1.V.2009”; Pingtung: 1♂ (TARI), Tahanshan (大漢山), 18.VI.2012, leg. Y.-T. Chung; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “11.VII.2012”; 2♂, 1♀ (TARI), same but with “24.IV.2013”; 3♂, 5♀ (TARI), same but with “15.V.2013”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “25.V.2013”; 2♀ (TARI), same but with “30.V.2013”; 3♀ (TARI), same but with “17.VI.2013”; 3♂ (TARI), same but with “2.VII.2013”; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “10.VII.2013”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “30.VII.2013”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “12.VI.2014”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “4.VI.2020”; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 19.VII.2012, leg. C.-F. Lee; 1♂ (TARI), Tahantrail (大漢林道), 20.VIII.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “27.V.2013”; Taipei: 1♀ (TARI), Hsiungkungshan (熊空山), 15.VI.2014, leg. Y.-L. Lin; Taitung: 1♀ (TARI), Lichia (利嘉), 15.VII.2014, leg. Y.-T. Chung; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “16.VII.2014”; Taoyuan: 1♂ (TARI), Hsiaowulai (小烏來), 29.IX.2009, leg. M-H. Tsou; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 1.VI.2010, leg. S.-F. Yu; 1♀ (TARI), Lalashan (拉拉山), 4.V.2009, leg. H.-J. Chen; 1♂ (TARI), Tungyanshan (東眼山), 12.VII.2015, leg. H. Lee.
Diagnosis.
Medium-sized species, 7.3-8.7mm. Body brown. Elytra with fine dense punctures. Discs of pronotum and elytra smooth, lacking reticulate microsculpture.
Redescription.
Length 7.3-8.6 mm, width 3.4-4.0 mm. Head and prothorax reddish brown (Fig. 18D-F View Figure 18 ), but antennae black; scutellum and elytra yellowish brown; meso- and metathoracic ventrites, and legs black. Eyes small, interocular space 2.24-2.76 × diameter of eye. Antennae filiform in males (Fig. 22A View Figure 22 ), gradually broadened from antennomere V to X, length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.6: 0.7: 0.7: 0.8: 0.7: 0.8: 0.8: 0.7: 0.7: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.8: 2.1: 2.2: 2.2: 2.6: 2.2: 2.4: 2.3: 2.0: 1.9: 2.7; similar in females (Fig. 22B View Figure 22 ), length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.6: 0.8: 0.6: 0.7: 0.7: 0.8: 0.7: 0.8: 0.7: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.7: 2.2: 2.2: 2.0: 2.1: 2.2: 2.1: 1.9: 2.2: 2.0: 2.8. Pronotum and elytra convex. Pronotum 2.2-2.3 × wider than long, disc smooth; with extremely dense, coarse punctures, and long pubescence, with median longitudinal and lateral depressions; lateral margins slightly rounded, widest at middle, apical margin slightly concave, basal margin straight; anterior and posterior setiferous punctures not erect. Elytra broad, parallel-sided, 1.6 × longer than wide; disc smooth, with dense, coarse punctures, and short pubescence. Apical spur of tibia of middle leg absent and tarsomere I not modified in males. Aedeagus (Fig. 22C, D View Figure 22 ) broad in dorsal view, 5.4 × as long as aedeagus, with several teeth along lateral margin near apex, secondary sclerite small and wide, 0.2 × as long as primary sclerite. Only apices of gonocoxae (Fig. 22F View Figure 22 ) sclerotized, longitudinal, with dense, long setae along lateral and apical margins. Ventrite VIII (Fig. 22E View Figure 22 ) well sclerotized, sides strongly curved, with dense, long setae laterally, apical area, and along apical margin, spiculum extremely long. Receptacle of spermatheca (Fig. 22G View Figure 22 ) very swollen; pump long and strongly curved; sclerotized proximal spermathecal duct wide and short. Apical margin of abdominal ventrite V broadly rounded with deep depression at middle in males (Fig. 22I View Figure 22 ); while lacking depression in females (Fig. 22H View Figure 22 ).
Remarks.
Adults of P. meihuai sp. nov. are similar to those of P. igai Kimoto in body sizes and color patterns (Fig. 17D, F View Figure 17 ), but differ by the shining, smooth pronotum and elytra (rough pronotum and elytra covered by reticulate microsculpture in P. igai ). In males of P. meihuai sp. nov., the lanceolate aedeagus (Fig. 22C View Figure 22 ) is similar to that of P. alishanensis sp. nov. (Fig. 16C View Figure 16 ) and P. meifena (Fig. 20C View Figure 20 ) but differs in possessing one secondary endophallic sclerite in addition to the primary endophallic sclerite (no secondary sclerite in P. meifena ; two secondary sclerites in P. alishanensis sp. nov.).
Host plant.
Larvae and adults feed on leaves of Acer serrulatum Hayata ( Sapindaceae ).
Biology.
Mr Mei-Hua Tsou collected mature larvae (Fig. 14E View Figure 14 ) April 5, 2009 in Mingchi, Northeast Taiwan. They began burrowing into soil at the same day, and built underground chambers for pupation. Duration of the pupal stage was 24-27 days. adults (Fig. 17F View Figure 17 ) appeared from spring to summer.
Distribution.
The species is widespread at mid-altitudes (1,500-2,500 m) in Taiwan.
Etymology.
Dedicated to Mr. Mei-Hua Tsou. He, the first author, and Mr. Hou-Jay Chen were the first to collect larvae of this new species and rear them successfully to adults.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |