Camponotus cozvlei Frogg
publication ID |
6104 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6287573 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/35820A34-4FAE-52AD-065F-14101EAFA75F |
treatment provided by |
Claudia |
scientific name |
Camponotus cozvlei Frogg |
status |
|
12. Pheidole longiceps, Mayr HNS . Paisley Bluff, in burrow nest under stone. Wrongly identified by Kirby and subsequently described by Forel as Pheidole deserticola HNS (Rev. Suisse Zool., xviii, p. 34, 1910)
The following species were described by Froggatt, Horn Exped. Zool., Part 2, 1896. As there are some doubts concerning the two species, I append a few notes, having examined the types in the National Museum.
(1) Camponotus cozvlei Frogg HNS ., l.c.., p. 387, pl. xxvii, figs. 1-5.
Examples compared with Lubbock's type of Melophorus bagoti HNS ,
by my friend, Mr. W. C. Crawley, are identical with the types in the National Museum. This species is widely distributed throughout Central and Western Australia, and is known as the yellow honey-ant. The synonymy of this species is as follows:-
Melophorus bagoti Lubbock HNS . Journ. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool., xvii, p. 51, 1883. Camponotus cowlei Frogg HNS . Melophorus cowlei Wheeler HNS , Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist,
xxiv, p. 388, 1908. Camponotus (Myrmophyma) cozvlei Emery HNS , Gen. Insect., Fasc. 183, p. 110, 1925.
(2) Camponotus midas Froggatt HNS , l.c., p. 390, pl. xxvii, figs. 6-9. This species was wrongly placed in the subgenus Myrmophyma HNS
by Emery (Gen. Insect., Fasc. 183, p. 111, 1925). It is placed in the sub-genus Myrmosaulus HNS , near C.(M.) aurocincta Smith HNS . The workers and female are redescribed below.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |