Rana lini, Chou, 1999
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5342868 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/35312B58-FF82-FFDF-2485-FE78FEF1E071 |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Rana lini |
status |
|
Comparison with Rana lini View in CoL and allocation of the specimens from Thailand
The low sample-size of adult males of Rana lini (two adult males) does not allow us to compare statistically with other species of Nidirana . Hence, we excluded these two specimens from the analysis. However, based on morphological comparison, this species should be placed in the R. adenopleura group by the following combination of characters: body slender, spinules on posterior half of back only, nest construction behavior absent.
As presented above, it is evident that the specimens from Thailand are quite different from most species from those Rana okinavana and Rana pleuraden groups but should be placed in the Rana adenopleura group (see Table 1 and Fig. 1 View Fig ). It is very difficult to differentiate the specimens from Thailand from Rana lini based on external morphological characters presented above. The statistical comparisons of two taxa are not considered here due to the low samplesized should be lead us misinterpretation. However, the body size of adult male specimens from Thailand (53.1–57.9 mm, n = 10) is larger than R. lini (44.1–46.7 mm, n = 2). If the measurements of body size given by Chou (1999) are included, the size of specimens from Thailand falls into the range (44.2–61.2 mm, n = 9) of Chou’s measurement. Therefore, we re-allocated here those specimens from Thailand to R. lini .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.