Lichenomima pearmani, González-Obando & Calderón-Martínez & Carrejo-Gironza, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5377.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2BA30329-4BDF-4595-9864-3CA23D56A659 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10248797 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/345F87BE-FB1A-FFE7-D9C8-3CA5AB11FB40 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lichenomima pearmani |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lichenomima pearmani n. sp.
( Figs 55–66 View FIGURES 55–60 View FIGURES 61–66 )
Diagnosis. Like L. bonaverensis n. sp. and L. chelata , it presents phallosome sledgehammer-shaped. Unlike these, it has external parameres with short apical lobes, endophallus with large sclerotized area and membrane with abundant spicules ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 55–60 ). Subgenital plate subrectangular, with apical lobe of uniform broad and ‘U’–shaped ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55–60 ).
Male. Color. Head ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 55–60 ) dark Brown, with darker spots on the vertex and postclypeus. Compound eyes black, ocelli hyaline, with ochre centripetal crescents. Coxae dark brown, femur brown, with a fringe white-creamy in the middle portion, tibia white-creamy with brown apex, tarsus 1 white-creamy, tarsi 2 and 3 brown. Forewing ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55–60 ) peppered light brown, veins brown, alar margin, subcostal and anal vein punctate, anal cell with dark brown spots, pterostigma with dark brown small dots which extend outside the margin, but retaining its shape, vein m with dark brown spot distally. Hindwings ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55–60 ) smoky, veins brown and dotted costal margin. Clunium and hypandrium ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55–60 ) dark brown, epiproct and paraprocts little pigmented ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 55–60 ).
Morphology. As in diagnosis, plus the following: Head ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 55–60 ): H/MxW: 1.26; compound eyes large, H/D: 1.39; IO/MxW: 0.44. Vertex slightly concave, below level of upper margin of compound eyes. Outer cusp of lacinial tips broad, with five denticles; Mx4/Mx2: 1.31. Forewings ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 55–60 ): L/W: 2.74. Vertex straight. Pterostigma: lp/wp: 3.23, areola postica high, with vertex touching vein M: al/ah: 1.45. Hindwings ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 55–60 ): l/w: 2.76. Hypandrium subtriangular,V-shaped, rounded apically with setae as illustrated ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 55–60 ),with preapical setae and three macrosetae. Phallosome ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 55–60 ). Paraprocts ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 55–60 ) with two small tubercles, medial one membranous and covered with setae and the second covered with spicules and short setae, with a curved up lateral projection sclerotized, prong (process) short hook-shaped, strongly curved and external setae on tubercles; sensory fields with 31 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 55–60 ) crescent-shaped, with cross-medial sclerotization covered by a row of setae.
Measurements. FW: 3125, HW: 2350, F: 625, T: 1175, t1: 440, t2: 67, t3: 83, ctt1: 19, f1: 700, f2: 625, f3: 567.5, Mx4: 184, IO: 240, d: 360, D: 490, IO/d: 0.67, PO: 0.73
Female. Color. Essentially as in males. Head ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61–66 ) clearer than in males, with longitudinal middle spot dark brown, clypeus dark brown. Wings ( Figs 61 and 62 View FIGURES 61–66 ) clearer than in males.
Morphology. As in diagnosis, plus the following: Head ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 61–66 ). H/MxW: 1.21; Vertex somewhat sinuous, slightly above upper level of compound eyes, these smaller than in males, H/D: 2.32, widely separated, IO/MxW: 0.71. Outer cusp of lacinial tips little wide, with five denticles; Mx4/Mx2: 1.25. Forewings ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 61–66 ): L/W: 2.56. Pterostigma: lp/wp: 3.02, areola postica almost as tall as wide, apically angled: al/ah: 1.34. Hindwings ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 61–66 ): l/w: 2.60. Paraprocts subrectangular ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61–66 ), with short external margin, distally and apical margin with rows of setae and macrosetae; lateroapical external area with group of abundant setae; sensory fields with 32 trichobothria on basal rosettes. Epiproct ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 61–66 ) subtriangular, broadly rounded apically and basal margin almost straight, distal field with setae and four macrosetae, apical margin with few setae. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 61–66 ). Gonapophyses typical to family ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 61–66 ), V1 apically acuminate, with microsetae, V2 distally acuminate, more than twice the length of V1, V3 oval and with setae and macrosetae as illustrated.
Measurements. FW: 3862.5, HW: 2925, F: 750, T: 1387.5, t1: 492, t2: 73, t3: 100, ctt1: 21, f1: 812.5, f2: 760, f3: 730, Mx4: 200, IO: 516, d: 257, D: 380, IO/d: 2.01, PO: 0.68.
Material studied. Holotype male. COLOMBIA. Cauca, Guapi, National Natural Park Gorgona Island, Playa Blanca . 02°5652.7”N: 78°11’32.4”W. 3m. 09–22.x.2010. MUSENUV slide code: 31314 . D. Torres. Malaise trap. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 2 males and 1 female. Cauca, Guapi, National Natural Park Gorgona Island . Mirador . 2°57’9’’N: 78°11’3.6’’W. 241m. 24–25.v.2011. MUSENUV slide code: 31307 , 31308 and 31309 . J. Mendivil & F. Sarria. Led light trap in forest canopy. GoogleMaps 1 female. Cauca, Guapi, National Natural Park Gorgona Island , Azufrada . 2° 57’1.6”N: 78°: 11’15.2”W. 13 m. 28.ii.2011. MUSENUV slide code: 31310 . F. Sarria. Led light trap in forest canopy. GoogleMaps Nariño, Santa Barbara de Iscuande , La Ensenada , 2°37’41.4” N: 78°4’57.4”W. 5m. 3–8.xii.2010. MUSENUV slide code: 31312 , F. Sarria, C. Salas. Led light trap in forest canopy. GoogleMaps 1 male, Valle del Cauca, Santiago de Cali , La Buitrera , 3°22’20.5’’N: 76°34’11.3’’W. 1153m. III.9.2015. MUSENUV slide code: 31311 . R. González. GoogleMaps 1 male, Antioquia, Dabeiba, Choromando forest , 7º01’02.2”N; 76º19’40.7”W. 758m. 13–18.iii.2018. MUSENUV slide code: 31313 . J. Mendivil. Led light trap in forest canopy. GoogleMaps
Etymology. This species is dedicated to John Victor Pearman, the author of the name of the family Myopsocidae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |