Digonocryptus teleborus Aguiar et Ramos, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.212568 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6172535 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/341A7C46-A724-FFFE-E2FE-BD9BFD76E0CC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Digonocryptus teleborus Aguiar et Ramos, 2011 |
status |
|
Digonocryptus teleborus Aguiar et Ramos, 2011
Morphological variation. On all females, white band of antenna starting at flagellomere IV, which is white on its apical 0.4–0.9, V–VII always fully white, VIII–IX from partially to fully white. In one female, from Ponta Grossa (southern Brazil), the overall body color is darker and contains much less orange than in typical D. teleborus .
Comments. Some degree of morphological convergence might occur with the similar D. pontagus when both species occur in sympatry—see Comments for male of that species.
Material examined. 9 females. 1 Ƥ from BRAZIL, RJ, Teresópolis, Parque Nacional Serra dos Órgãos, 22º26’S 42º52’W, 31.X–05.XI.2004, Malaise trap, point A2, ALBG Peronti et al.; 1 Ƥ same data except point A4 ( UFES); 1 Ƥ from BRAZIL, Paraná, Ponta Grossa (V. Velha), Reserva IAPAR, BR 376, 11.VIII.1986, Malaise trap, Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR; 1 Ƥ from BRAZIL, Paraná, Fênix, Reserva Estadual ITCF, 04.VIII.1986, Malaise trap, Lev. Ent. PROFAUPAR ( DZUP). 1 Ƥ from BRAZIL, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutônia, 11.II.1960, FPlaumann; 2 Ƥ, same data except VIII.1966; 1 Ƥ, same data except XI.1966; 1 Ƥ, same data except VIII.1967 ( CNCI).
Distribution. Brazil (RJ NR, SP, PR, SC) ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 88 – 95 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |