Wroughtonia robustifemur Long, 2024
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5446.2.4 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:582B049F-FD5A-483A-A212-D63869125E32 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11104804 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/335D879D-543F-D369-FBA4-57344BD9315E |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Wroughtonia robustifemur Long |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Wroughtonia robustifemur Long , sp. nov.
Figures 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5
Type material. Holotype, ♀, “Hel. 096 ” ( IEBR), NW Vietnam: Lai Chau, Sin Ho, Sa De Phin , forest, 22°18’18’’N 103°13’37’’E, 1760 m, light trap, 31.v.2022, PT Nhi. GoogleMaps
Diagnostic characters. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres, 9 th –14 th flagellomeres cream white; frontal protuberance lamelliform, acute dorsally ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); in dorsal view width of head 1.75 × its median length; height of eye 2.2 × temple; in frontal view height of eye 1.9 × its transverse width; width of face 1.65 × length of face and clypeus combined; malar space 1.3 × height of eye; in lateral view height of eye 1.5 × as long as transverse width; transverse width of eye 1.6 × temple. Mesosoma 1.9 × longer than high; in lateral view, mesoscutum perpendicularly raised above pronotum; notauli deep, sparsely crenulate anteriorly, fused posteriorly with two rugosities forming one median carina close to scutellar sulcus; scutellar sulcus 0.6 × scutellum; propodeum with medio-basal carina and elongate areola ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Length of fore wing 2.9 × its maximum width; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r; vein 2-M 2.0 × 3-SR; hind wing vein 1-M 2.1 × 1r-m; vein 2-SC+R vertical. Fore tarsus 1.4 × as long as fore tibia; hind femur robust, with ventral serrations and without tooth-shaped protuberance ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); length of hind femur (without tooth or serrations) 3.2 × as long as its maximum width; hind coxa smooth laterally, with sparse fine punctures and short sparse setae. First metasomal tergite slightly widened apically, 1.2 × longer than its apical width; dorsal carinae in basal 0.5 of tergite; first tergite areolate-rugulose medially; median length of second tergite 0.4 × its apical width ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); second tergite largely punctate, 0.8 × as long as third tergite; first tergite areolate-rugulose; second tergite punctate-reticulate medially, smooth laterally and apically; the remaining tergites shiny, smooth.
Notes. W. robustifemur sp. nov. is similar to W. simulata Long, 2020 , but differs from the latter by the following characters: 1) in lateral view, mesoscutum vertically elevated above pronotum ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4F View FIGURE 4 ) (mesoscutum roundly elevated above pronotum in W. simulata ); 2) dorsal carinae of first tergite in basal 0.5 of the tergite (vs 0.8 of the tergite); and 3) propodeum yellow entirely (vs propodeum black in W. simulata ).
W. robustifemur sp. nov. runs out to couplet 11a of the key by Long et al. (2020) as follows:
11a. Frontal protuberance lamelliform, not pointed apically; propodeum areolate-rugose, without areola (11a); second submarginal cell of fore wing trapezium-shaped, narrow (11 aa); vein r of fore wing exiting from middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 0.9 × r (11 aa) (see Fig. 102 in Long et al. 2020); vein 1-M of hind wing 0.4 × as long as vein 1r-m....... W. simulata Long, 2020
11a’. Frontal protuberance lamelliform, pointed apically ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); propodeum with areola (11b); second submarginal cell of fore wing trapezium-shaped, broad (11 bb); vein r exiting from before middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r (11 bb); vein 1-M of hind wing 2.1 × as long as vein 1r-m ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ).................................... W. robustifemur Long , sp. nov.
Description. Holotype, ♀, body length 5.6 mm, fore wing length 5.0 mm, ovipositor sheath 2.8 mm ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Head. Antenna with 32 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15 × longer than second flagellomere; in frontal view height of eye 1.9 × its transverse width; width of face 1.65 × length of face and clypeus combined; malar space 1.3 × as long as mandible width and 0.5 × height of eye ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); maxillary palp 1.4 × as long as head; frontal protuberance lamelliform, simple and acute ( Figs 4B, C View FIGURE 4 ); in dorsal view width of head 1.75 × its median length; height of eye 2.2 × temple; ocelli small, OOL: OD: POL = 12: 5: 7; distance between front and hind ocelli, 0.3 × OOL ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ); in lateral view height of eye 1.5 × its transverse width; transverse width of eye 1.6 × temple ( Fig. 4C View FIGURE 4 ); face coarsely rugose, with parallel crenulate grooves from antennal sockets to clypeal suture ( Fig. 4D View FIGURE 4 ); clypeus rugose; frons, vertex and temple smooth.
Mesosoma . Mesosoma 1.9 × longer than high; mesoscutum perpendicularly raised above pronotum ( Fig. 4F View FIGURE 4 ); pronotal side coarsely carinate-rugose medially; largely rugose ventrally and dorsally; mesopleuron smooth medially, with reticulate punctures dorsally, largely rugo-punctate ventrally and posterioly; metapleuron areolate-rugose; median lobe of mesoscutum coriaceous medio-anteriorly, areolate-rugulose laterally and posteriorly; lateral lobes of mesoscutum coriaceous to rugulose; notauli wide, largely rugose, fusing posteriorly with one rugosity in median transverse rugose area of mesoscutum ( Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ); scutellar sulcus smooth, with one carinae, 0.6 × as long as scutellum; scutellum largely rugose; propodeum areolate-rugulose, with medio-basal carina and elongate areola, areola with sparse transverse rugosities posteriorly ( Fig. 4G View FIGURE 4 ).
Wings. Length of fore wing 2.9 × its maximum width; pterostigma 2.6 × as long as wide ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ); vein r exiting before middle of pterostigma; vein 3-SR 1.2 × r; r: 2-SR: 3-SR: SR1: r-m = 10: 14: 12: 60: 13; 1-CU1: cu-a: 2-CU1 = 3: 8: 20; second submarginal cell trapezium-shaped, vein 2-M 2.0 × 3-SR ( Fig. 4I View FIGURE 4 ); hind wing vein 1-M 2.1 × as long as vein 1r-m; vein 2-SC+R vertical ( Fig. 4J View FIGURE 4 ); hind wing with 3 hamuli.
Legs. Fore tarsus 1.4 × longer than fore tibia; hind femur robust, with ventral serrations and stout tooth-shaped protuberance ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); length of hind femur (without tooth or serrations), tibia and basitarsus 3.2, 7.7 and 6.0 × as long as their maximum width, respectively; hind coxa smooth laterally, with sparse fine punctures and short sparse setae; hind femur largely rugose-punctate laterally, rather densely setose ventrally ( Fig. 4K View FIGURE 4 ); hind tibial spurs short and robust; hind basitarsus 0.35 × as long as hind tibia, and 0.8 × as long as second–fifth hind tarsus; fourth hind tarsus short, 0.4 × telotarsus.
Metasoma. Metasoma 0.65 × as long as head and mesosoma combined; first tergite slightly widened apically, 1.2 × longer than its apical width; dorsal carinae in basal 0.5 of tergite ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); first tergite areolate-rugulose ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); median length of second tergite 0.4 × its apical width, and 0.8 × third tergite; second suture weakly indicated, smooth ( Fig. 4H View FIGURE 4 ); second tergite punctate-reticulate medially, smooth laterally and apically; remaining tergites smooth; ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.
Colour. Head black; scapus and pedicel yellow; flagellum brown, except and two basal flagellomeres yellow and 9 th –14 nd flagellomeres cream white; first-second segments of palpi yellowish brown, the remaining segments yellow; mesonotum brown; propleuron and mesopleuron pale brown; metapleuron and propodeum yellow; fore and middle legs yellow; hind coxa yellow, pale brown infuscate dorso-laterally; trochanter and trochantellus yellow; hind femur brown; tibia pale yellow in basal one third, brown apical two third; first–third hind tarsus whitish-yellow; fourth-fifth tarsus brown; pterostigma and wing veins brown; wing membrane hyaline; first metasomal tergite yellow; second–sixth tergites pale brown; ovipositor sheath brown; ovipositor yellow.
Male: Unknown.
Etymology. “robustus” Latin for “hard, strong”, in reference to the robust hind femur.
Host. Unknown.
Distribution. Northwestern Vietnam (Lai Chau province) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |