Hylcalosia carinata, Zhu & Achterberg & Chen, 2018

Zhu, Jiachen, Achterberg, Cornelis Van & Chen, Xue-Xin, 2018, Review of the genus Hylcalosia Fischer (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Alysiinae), with description of four new species from China, Zootaxa 4462 (4), pp. 547-565 : 549-552

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4462.4.7

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FFE1C5A9-E523-4027-A63C-76C487A3B1AF

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5964079

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/331387FF-FFF1-FFAE-FF78-6EFCEA44C184

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hylcalosia carinata
status

sp. nov.

Hylcalosia carinata sp. nov.

Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2

Type material. Holotype, ♀ ( ZJUH), “ [SE. China:] Hainan, Mt. Diaoluo , 1–2.?.2007, Liu Jingxian, No. 200704003.” Paratypes : 1♂ ( ZJUH), Hainan, Yinggeling, 24–26.?.2007, Liu Jingxian, No. 200704037 ; 1♀ ( ZJUH), Guangdong, Meizhoufengxi, 29.?.2003, Chen Jujian, No. 20048594 ; 1♀ ( ZJUH), Hainan, Yinggeling, 28.?–3.?.2007, Weng Liqiong, No. 200804321.

Diagnosis. Body yellowish ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); eye in dorsal view 2.1 × longer than temple ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ); eye in lateral view as high as wide ( Fig. 2K View FIGURE 2 ); frons largely smooth, slightly rugose near antennal sockets; vertex and temple smooth ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ); face rather convex in middle, densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate with transverse striation ( Fig. 2J View FIGURE 2 ); clypeus subtriangular, protruding forward, densely and finely reticulate-punctate ( Fig. 2J View FIGURE 2 ); mandible rugose and with 4 teeth or lobes ( Fig. 2K View FIGURE 2 ); notauli crenulated and incomplete, impressed on disc anteriorly ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); medio-posterior depression deep, nearly extending to middle of mesoscutum ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); precoxal sulcus crenulate; metapleuron smooth in middle but reticulate-rugose ventrally ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); surface of propodeum weakly rugose, with a mediolongitudinal carina present on basal half of propodeum, areola present posteriorly ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); pterostigma wide, 3 × as long as maximum width ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ); hind coxa smooth ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); metasoma longitudinally striate and some reticulate-rugosity between striae, length of first tergite 0.9 × its apical width ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.5 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.6 ×), and 1.5 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 2G View FIGURE 2 ); mesosoma and first tergite of metasoma yellowish, second and third tergite of metasoma dark brown ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ).

Description. ♀, length of body 3.1 mm, of fore wing 3.2 mm.

Head. Transverse ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ), width of head 1.7 × its lateral length ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ), and 1.6 × wider than mesoscutum; antenna with 40 segments, third segment (including annellus) 0.8 × longer than fourth segment, length of third and fourth segments 2.5 and 4.0 × their width, respectively ( Fig. 2M View FIGURE 2 ); length of maxillary palp 1.7 × height of head; eye in dorsal view 2.1 × as long as temple ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ); eye in lateral as high as wide; frons largely smooth, slightly rugose near antennal sockets; vertex and temple smooth ( Fig. 2I View FIGURE 2 ); OOL: diameter of ocellus: POL= 12:5:5; face 1.8 × wider than high, rather convex medially, densely and coarsely rugose-reticulate with transverse striation; clypeus small, subtriangular, protruding forward, densely and finely reticulate-punctate ( Fig. 2J View FIGURE 2 ); malar space absent; mandible with 4 teeth or lobes, enlarged apically, dorsal tooth enlarged, lobe-shaped ( Fig. 2L View FIGURE 2 ), ventral tooth medium-sized and lobe-shaped, ventral carina protruding, middle tooth curved ( Fig. 2M View FIGURE 2 ), medial length of mandible 1.5 × its maximum width.

Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.7 × its height ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); pronope round, wide and deep; medio-anteriorly pronotum inconspicuously crenulate, remainder of pronotum smooth ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); epicnemial area rugose; precoxal sulcus widely crenulate, not reaching middle coxa; pleural sulcus crenulated ventrally; episternal scrobe round and deep; metapleuron smooth medially but reticulate-rugose ventrally ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ); notauli crenulated and incomplete, anteriorly impressed on disc, ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); medio-posterior depression deep, nearly extending to middle of mesoscutum, scutellar sulcus deep, with one longitudinal carina, sulcus 4.1 × wider than its maximum length; scutellum smooth ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); surface of propodeum weakly rugose, with a medio-longitudinal carina present on half of propodeum, areola present posteriorly ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ).

Wings ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A-B). Pterostigma wide, 3 × longer than its maximum width. r:3-SR:SR1 = 1:3:11; 1-SR+M nearly straight; SR1 straight; r 0.5 × as long as width of pterostigma; cu-a postfurcal; 1-CU1:2-CU1 = 3: 19; 3-CU1 distinct shorter than CU1b; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 20:15:12; m-cu postfurcal, converging to 1-M posteriorly; first subdiscal cell 3.3 × as long as wide; M+CU1 largely unsclerotized. Hind wing: M+CU: 1-M: 1r-m = 10:6:5; m-cu far antefurcal.

Legs. Hind coxa smooth, without ventro-basal tubercle; tarsal claws moderately robust, longer than arolium ( Fig. 2N View FIGURE 2 ); length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 4.6, 9.0 and 6.3 × their width, respectively; apical appendages of hind tarsal segments absent, segments ventrally with dense bristles ( Fig. 2N View FIGURE 2 ).

Metasoma. First tergite widened from base to apex, apical width twice longer than its basal width, length of first tergite 0.9 × its apical width, with distinct dorsal carinae fused in basal half, medially convex ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ); dorsope distinct ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ); median length of second tergite 0.9 × its basal width, 0.7 × as long as its maximum posterior width, 1.3 × length of third tergite; combined length of second and third tergites 1.2 × their maximum width ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.5 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.6 ×), and 1.5 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 2H View FIGURE 2 ).

Colour. Yellowish ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ); metasoma (except yellowish first tergite) and antenna (except yellowish 6 basal segments) dark brown; pterostigma and anterior part of veins brown, remainder of veins and wing membrane hyaline.

Variation. Male paratype similar to female types, body length of ♂ 3.0 mm; of fore wing 3.2 mm; antennal segments of ♂ 43 (1). Females have body length 2.9–3.1 mm, and length of fore wing 3.0– 3.2 mm, eye in dorsal view 2.1–2.4 × as long as temple; face 1.7-1.8 × wider than high.

Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to H. hymaenei Belokobylskij , but differs from it in having comparatively short temple, eye in dorsal view 2.1–2.4 × as long as temple (versus 1.2–1.7 in H. hymaenei ); face 1.7-1.8 × wider than high (versus 2.1-2.7 ×); body yellowish to yellowish brown (versus reddish brownish to black).

Etymology. Named “ carinata ” because the propodeum has a long medio-longitudinal carina: “ carina ” is Latin for “ridge”.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Hylcalosia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF