Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) minangkabauensis C. Blattný, 1926
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4952.2.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:78A8C4F0-42FE-4CD9-BF32-5FE65A155EAA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4674216 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/304487A7-FFBB-FFC1-05D7-FE39FF64715B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) minangkabauensis C. Blattný |
status |
|
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) minangkabauensis C. Blattný View in CoL
Scydmaenus minangkabauensis Blattný, 1926: 3 View in CoL . Based on type material from Sumatra.
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) hoabinhensis Lhoste, 1937: 401 . Based on type material from Vietnam; specimens from Canton mentioned. Incorrect original spelling haobinhensis, corrected by Lhoste 1938: 114.
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) hoabinhensis Lhoste, 1938: 114 . As new; synonymic homonym. Synonymized by Franz, 1984: 104.
Distribution. China (Guangdong) ( Lhoste, 1938: 114); India (Kerala) ( Franz, 1989: 40); Indonesia (Java: Lhoste, 1938: 114; Sumatra: Blattný, 1926: 3; Lhoste 1938: 114); Nepal ( Franz, 1974: 15; Franz, 1981: 296); Pakistan ( Franz, 1982: 128); Sri Lanka ( Lhoste, 1938: 114; Franz, 1982: 128); Malaysia (Sabah) ( Franz, 1992: 860); Thailand ( Chûjô, 1964: 177); Taiwan ( Lhoste, 1938: 114), Vietnam ( Lhoste 1937: 401; Lhoste, 1938: 114).
Remarks. Aedeagus of S. minangkabauensis was illustrated in Franz (1989: 39, fig. 7), but not explained whether based on a type specimen or not, or from what locality (but Franz (1984: 104) examined syntypes and studied aedeagus of a specimen designated as lectotype). Scydmaenus hoabinhensis was redescribed by Franz (1982: 128) including illustration of aedeagus, but no type material was mentioned, and again, it remains unknown whether this illustration was based on a type or non-type specimen, and from what locality. Scydmaenus hoabinhensis was listed as a possible (with question mark) junior synonym of Scydmaenus vestitoides in Franz (1985: 110); the latter hypothesis was not supported by any evidence and was apparently based on a specimen from Taiwan identified by Csiki as S. vestitoides , but as S. hoabinhensis by Franz (1985: 110); later Franz (1989: 40) rejected this synonymy, but again without studying the type material of S. vestitoides . Species omitted from checklist of O’Keefe & Li (1998).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) minangkabauensis C. Blattný
Jałoszyński, Paweł 2021 |
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) hoabinhensis
Franz, H. 1984: 104 |
Lhoste, J. 1938: 114 |
Scydmaenus (Scydmaenus) hoabinhensis
Lhoste, J. 1938: 114 |
Lhoste, J. 1937: 401 |
Scydmaenus minangkabauensis Blattný, 1926: 3
Blattny, C. 1926: 3 |