Neohesperilla Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab086 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E8867B19-E3F4-4089-B2CB-9AC381F0E70D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6985979 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2E392074-FF86-FFE4-E73D-D1C7FD3CFC90 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neohesperilla Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914 |
status |
|
Neohesperilla Waterhouse & Lyell, 1914 View in CoL syn. nov.
Type species: Toxidia thyrrhus Mabille, 1891 View in CoL (by monotypy).
Remarks
Braby (2010: p. 26) remarked ‘The genus Toxidia comprises a divergent assemblage of taxa [currently nine species] that have probably been grouped together more for convenience than on phylogenetic grounds.’ Notably, he pointed out that the genus Neohesperilla on available evidence is poorly defined; the known morphological characters do not distinguish it from Toxidia (see Braby, 2000). Moreover, the morphology of the larva and pupa, general biology and larval food plants of Neohesperilla ( Johnson et al., 1994) are similar to those of Toxidia ( Crosby, 1973; Atkins, 1988; Wood & Muller, 2003; Jenkinson, 2009). For example, in both taxa the head of the final instar larva is black and finely pitted or rugose, and the head of the pupa is sclerotized and rounded, lacking a prominent projection. Currently, four species are referred to Neohesperilla , but phylogenetic analysis of this genus has, until now, been lacking to establish its systematic relationship and determine whether Neohesperilla should be maintained or synonymized with Toxidia .
In the phylogeny generated in the present study, Toxidia was paraphyletic and polyphyletic with regard to Neohesperilla and Signeta , respectively. Although Neohesperilla comprised a monophyletic lineage, it was embedded within a larger clade that consisted of six other species of Toxidia , while the two species of Signeta formed a monophyletic group with two other species of Toxidia ( Toxidia peron and Toxidia melania ) that was sister to the remaining species of Toxidia plus Neohesperilla .
Given the strong phylogenetic relationships uncovered in the present work, previous morphological studies, and the lack of clear synapomorphies by which to distinguish Neohesperilla from Toxidia , we synonymize Neohesperilla under Toxidia . The issue of polyphyly with regard to Signeta is dealt with below, in which we remove two species from Toxidia . Thus, the nomenclature, new combinations and synonyms recognized for the revised 11 species of Toxidia and their constituent subspecies are as follows:
Toxidia arfakensis (Joicey & Talbot, 1917)
Toxidia inornata (Butler, 1883)
Toxidia inornata inornata (Butler, 1883)
= Hesperia maykora Plötz, 1885
= Telesto uniformis Swinhoe, 1905
Toxidia inornata sekara (Plötz, 1885)
= Toxidia damora Fruhstorfer, 1911
Toxidia inornata anga Evans, 1949
Toxidia andersoni (Kirby, 1893)
Toxidia rietmanni (Semper, [1879])
Toxidia rietmanni rietmanni (Semper, [1879])
= Telesto extranea Plötz, 1884
= Telesto leucostigma Meyrick & Lower, 1902
Toxidia rietmanni parasema (Lower, 1908)
Toxidia doubledayi (C. Felder, 1862)
= Telesto leachii C. Felder, 1862
= Carystus vallio Mabille, 1883
Toxidia thyrrhus Mabille, 1891
= Telesto bathrophora Meyrick & Lower, 1902 Toxidia parvula (Plötz, 1884)
= Hesperilla humilis Miskin, 1889
= Hesperilla ismene Anderson & Spry, 1894
Toxidia xanthomera ( Meyrick & Lower, 1902) comb. nov.
Toxidia senta ( Miskin, 1891) comb. nov.
Toxidia xiphiphora ( Lower, 1911) comb. nov.
Toxidia crocea (Miskin, 1889) comb. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Papilionoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Trapezitinae |