Paralaophonte pacifica Lang, 1965

Gómez, S. & Morales-Serna, F. N., 2013, On a small collection of Laophontidae T. Scott (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from Mexico. I. New species and new records of Laophonte Philippi and Paralaophonte Lang, Journal of Natural History 47 (5 - 12), pp. 329-380 : 340

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2012.757657

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5198257

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2C4C87C9-DF0D-7D1B-FE27-2596FDFDFDC5

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Paralaophonte pacifica Lang
status

 

Paralaophonte pacifica Lang

( Figures 7–9 View Figure 7 View Figure 8 View Figure 9 )

Material examined

One dissected female (EMUCOP-03). Collected from off Campeche State (19 ◦ 29 ′ 52.74 ′′ N, 91 ◦ 01 ′ 50.04 ′′ W), 16.7 m depth, 55.5% sand, 4% clay, 40.4%, collected in 2002, silt GoogleMaps .

Locality

Off Campeche State, Gulf of Mexico (south-eastern Mexico) (19 ◦ 29 ′ 52.74 ′′ N, 91 ◦ 01 ′ 50.04 ′′ W) GoogleMaps .

Remarks

Lang (1965) described Paralaophonte pacifica from Monterey Bay (California). Mielke (1981) found many specimens of Paralaophonte in samples taken from various sites in the Galapagos. In a first approach, he suggested a possible close relationship of his material with P. dieuzeidei (Monard) , P. brevirostris (Claus) and P. pacifica and considered Sars’ (1908) description of P. brevirostris as the reference diagnosis noting that this nominal species might contain other species. He recognized some differences between the Galapagos material, and P. dieuzeidei and P. brevirostris , and concluded that the population from the Galapagos might well belong to a subspecies of P. pacifica , which he named P. pacifica galapagoensis Mielke. Almost three decades later, Huys and Lee (2009) suggested a closer relationship of P. pacifica galapagoensis with P. brevirostris , than to its nominotypical subspecies P. pacifica pacifica , and raised it to full species rank based on a number of differences (see Huys and Lee 2009: 22–23). The Mexican material from the Gulf of Mexico is herein attributed to P. pacifica . These two species are identical mainly in the presence of a small projection on the female second antennulary segment ( Figure 7B View Figure 7 ), length: width ratio of the caudal rami ( Figure 7A View Figure 7 ), and general shape of the female P5 ( Figure 9C View Figure 9 ). Unfortunately, only one female was found and no comments can be made about the variability of the material herein presented or about the male sexual dimorphism.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF