Leucanthemum laciniatum Huter et al. (1878

Galasso, Gabriele, Bartolucci, Fabrizio & Peruzzi, Lorenzo, 2018, Printed, or just indelible? On the earliest legitimate names, authorship and typification of the taxa described from Italy by Huter, Porta and / or Rigo, Phytotaxa 361 (1), pp. 77-86 : 79-80

Leucanthemum laciniatum Huter et al. (1878 : n. 617)

Type (lectotype, designated here):— ITALY. Calabria III. in Mte Dirupata di Morano, et in mte Mula pr. S Donato (Sosti) loc. rupestrib. gramin. sol. calc. 9–1900 m. 11 June and 26 July 1877, Huter, Porta, Rigo, ex itinere italico III N ° 617 ( FI barcode FI 001778 [digital image!, available at http://parlatore.msn.unifi.it/types], individual on the left).

Nomenclatural notes:—Duplicates of the collection 617 of the authors’ “ Iter Italicum III ” (i.e., syntypes) were traced at FI. Among them, we select here as lectotype a well-preserved specimen conserved at FI, which matches the current application of the name (e.g., Pignatti 1982c, Conti et al. 2005, Peruzzi et al. 2014, 2015b, Bartolucci et al. 2018c). The other specimens from the same collection were collected at more than one time, so that they belong to more than one gathering and cannot be accepted as isolectotypes (Art. 8.2 [footnote 1] and Art. 8 Ex. 3 of the ICN).

Melampyrum barbatum var. variegatum Porta & Rigo (1874 – 1876: without number)

≡ Melampyrum variegatum (Porta & Rigo) Huter (1907b: 246)

Type (lectotype, designated here):— ITALY. Italia austr Apulia: Gargano in sylvis di Vico sol. calcar 1–2000’ s. m., 11 June 1874, Porta, Rigo, ex itinere I italico s.n. ( FI barcode 07372 [digital image!, available at http://parlatore.msn.unifi.it/types]).

Nomenclatural notes:—This variety was so far believed to have been published (as a species) in 1907 ( Huter 1907b: 246). We were able to find just one gathering (without number) of the authors’ “ Iter Italicum I ” (i.e., syntype) at FI, which is selected here as lectotype. The lectotype fits with the current application of the name (e.g., Pignatti 1982 b, Conti et al. 2005, Peruzzi et al. 2014, 2015b, Bartolucci et al. 2018c).

Micromeria marifolia var. italica Huter (1907d: 402)

≡ Micromeria fruticosa var. italica (Huter) Fenaroli (1973: 375) ≡ Clinopodium italicum (Huter) Bräuchler (2018: 75)

Type (lectotype, designated by Fenaroli 1973: pl. XXVIII):— ITALY. Italia austral. Apulia ad rupes pr. Manfredonia 20–60’. sol. calcar. raro!, 29 June 1875, Porta, Rigo, ex itinere II italico N ° 387 ( FI 018282! [digital image!, available at http://parlatore.msn.unifi.it/ types]. Isolectotype: BOZ Herb. Huter 41698, consisting of two sheets).

Nomenclatural notes:—The typification of this variety was recently discussed by Bräuchler (2018), who considers this taxon as a distinct species, endemic to Italy.

Muscari longifolium Rigo (1905: 152)

≡ Muscari botryoides ( Linnaeus 1753: 318) Miller (1768 : without pagination) subsp. longifolium (Rigo) Garbari in Frattini et al. (1996: 59)

Type (lectotype, designated by Frattini et al. 1996: 55):— ITALY. Loc. Venetia. – Prov. di Verona: in rupestribus graminosis erectis inter Torri et Pai ad Benacum (lago di Garda), loco dicto la Pozza, alt. 80– 100 m., March–April 1904, G. Rigo s.n. ( FI barcode FI 007048 [digital image!, available at http://parlatore.msn.unifi.it/types], specimen on the right). Isolectotypes: FI barcodes FI 007048 [digital image!, specimens on the left], FI 007052 [digital image!], WU No. 0065346 [digital image!]).

Nomenclatural notes:—According to Art. 23.5 of the ICN the spelling of the epithet originally published as “ longifolius ” is to be corrected in “ longifolium ” (see Peruzzi et al. 2015b).