Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens Mathews
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/832.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4611955 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4687A0-9E63-FFAB-FF22-77C1FC51154F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens Mathews |
status |
|
Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens Mathews
Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens Mathews, 1912a: 431 (North-West Australia (Parry’s Creek)).
Now Neochmia ruficauda subclarescens (Mathews, 1912) View in CoL . See Mayr et al., 1968: 357; Schodde and Mason, 1999: 752–753; Dickinson, 2003: 732; and Payne, 2010: 354.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 721950 About AMNH , adult male, collected on Parry Creek , 15.32S, 128.09E ( USBGN, 1957), 5 mi west of Trig. Station H.J. 9, East Kimberley, Western Australia, Australia, on 2 February 1909, by J.P. Rogers (no. 617). From the Mathews Collection (no. 3541) via the Rothschild Collection. GoogleMaps
COMMENTS: Mathews cited his catalog number of the holotype in the original description and gave the range of subclarescens as ‘‘North-West Australia.’’ The holotype bears, in addition to the original Rogers label, Mathews and Rothschild type labels and a ‘‘Figured’’ label, indicating that it is illustrated in Mathews (1926: 227, pl. 571, opp. p. 226, upper fig., as Bathilda ruficauda ). The figured male is said to be the type of subclarescens, but the date of collection is misread from the specimen: the ‘‘F’’ in Feb. is misread as ‘‘7’’ and the ‘‘eb’’ as ‘‘6,’’ so the date is given as ‘‘27 June.’’ The catalog number was correctly given. A single paratype is AMNH 721951 (Mathews no. 3542), female, Parry Creek, 2 February 1909, by J.P. Rogers (no. 616). Other specimens were either never in Mathews’ collection or were cataloged after the publication of subclarescens on 31 January 1912.
Schodde and Mason (1999: 752–753) discussed this species, noting that two names, published at the same time, were available for the northwestern subspecies. As first revisors, they recognized subclarescens, choosing that name over thorpei (see below). Dickinson (2003: 732) followed this. Payne (2010: 354) recognized only two subspecies, clarescens (including subclarescens) and ruficauda .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens Mathews
LeCroy, Mary 2013 |
Neochmia ruficauda subclarescens (Mathews, 1912)
Payne, R. B. 2010: 354 |
Dickinson, E. C. 2003: 732 |
Schodde, R. & I. J. Mason 1999: 752 |
Mayr, E. & R. A. Paynter, Jr. & M. A. Traylor & African 1968: 357 |
Aegintha ruficauda subclarescens
Mathews, G. M. 1912: 431 |