Carinatogecko aspratilis (Anderson, 1973)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13712506 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:RASTEGAR-POUYANI |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B2D87F8-8904-FFDA-FCDD-FE8EB130FB77 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Carinatogecko aspratilis |
status |
|
Carinatogecko aspratilis (n = 3): RUZM-GC 10.1 – RUZM-GC10.3: Iran, Kermanshah Province.
Carinatogecko heteropholis (n = 22): RUZM-GC.110 – RUZM-GC.131: Iran, Ilam Province, Shirvan and Chardavol, Karezan , Sarab-e-Karezan village [33°44΄ N, 46°29΄ E and 1325 m above sea level] .
Carinatogecko ilamensis sp. nov. (n = 2): RUZM-GC 120.1 – RUZM-GC 120.2 : Iran, Ilam Province, Dehloran Township, Zarinabad region [32°57′51″ N, 47°03′23″ E and 543 m above sea level] GoogleMaps .
excavating a hole at the foot of a Capparis spinosa at 10:00 a.m.
Both holotype and paratype specimens were preserved in 95% ethanol and deposited in RUZM (Razi University Zoological Museum). Some of their characters differ significantly from those of the other three species of Carinatogecko (see below). The two unknown specimens were compared with the other three species of Carinatogecko (i.e., C. heteropholis , C. aspratilis , and C. stevenandersoni ) as well as with the genus Bunopus ( B. tuberculatus ; Tables 1-2; Material examined).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |