Dipolydora cf. socialis (Schmarda, 1861)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1015.54387 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F6BD9213-9DB7-4564-AA00-3C61B2F43B2D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2A89B6F1-2882-5E15-B9B9-095DA6895234 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Dipolydora cf. socialis (Schmarda, 1861) |
status |
|
Dipolydora cf. socialis (Schmarda, 1861) Fig. 7O View Figure 7
Larval morphology.
Late larvae usually thick and slightly fusiform in shape, although not as much as the larvae of Boccardia sp. 2 (Fig. 7G View Figure 7 ), Boccardiella hamata (Fig. 7H, I View Figure 7 ), and Pseudopolydora species (Fig. 9A-I View Figure 9 ). Anterior margin of prostomium has yellow-brown pigment. Three pairs of black eyes arranged in transverse row, most lateral pairs double-eyes. Band of black pigment on each lateral part of the peristomium. First dorsal black melanophores occur as paired bands on chaetiger III and continue through to chaetiger V. From chaetiger VI, two pairs of dorsal black spots or bands occur and continue to posterior end of body. From chaetiger IV or V and continuing posteriorly, clusters of small black pigmented cells present in transverse row on dorsal posterior half of chaetigers. Lateral pigment found on late larvae on chaetiger II. Each notopodial lobe tipped with orange pigment, small patch of black pigment at the base of notopodial lobes. Ventral pigment consists of paired bars on posterior border of chaetigers, commencing with chaetiger II. Some black or brown pigment may occur on pygidium. Gastrotrochs occur on chaetigers III, V, VII, X, XIII, XV and XVII.
Remarks.
Adults of this species were non-boring and collected from muddy bottom sediment at 22 m depth in Onagawa Bay in December 2010 by using a Smith-McIntyre grab sampler and from bottom sediments of shallow subtidal zone in Sasuhama in April 2013. Adult morphology agrees with the description of D. socialis by Sato-Okoshi (2000). The 18S rRNA gene sequence obtained in the present study showed a 0.35% (6/1715 bp) difference with that of D. cf. socialis from South Africa (KY677899) reported by Williams et al. (2017), which may indicate that these two are different species. The 18S rRNA gene sequence obtained in the present study rather closer to that of D. carunculata (940/942 bp match) reported by Radashevsky and Pankova (2013), but the 16S gene sequence showed a 2.3% (11/475 bp) difference with that of D. carunculata . As described above, since the taxonomic status of the species reported here is uncertain, we tentatively referred to it as D. cf. socialis .
Planktonic larvae of this species were collected from Onagawa Bay in November 2010 and 2011, and in October 2012. The larvae and adults were confirmed to match (18S: 1770/1770, 16S: 473/475 bp) using molecular data (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). The larval morphology of this species agrees with that of D. socialis described as Polydora socialis by Blake (1969) and Carrasco (1976).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |