Cyclaspis thomsoni Calman 1907
Gerken, Sarah, 2013, New Zealand Bodotriidae (Crustacea: Cumacea), Zootaxa 3630 (1), pp. 1-38 : 29
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3630.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EC4C806-85C8-4CCA-BA39-7845D6A9ACEF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6164557 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/261B5627-FFDE-FFCE-C3F3-E6F3FD4409FB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyclaspis thomsoni Calman 1907 |
status |
|
Cyclaspis thomsoni Calman 1907 View in CoL
Diagnosis. Female. Carapace covered with shallow pits, with a rugose appearance rather than smooth, with single incomplete vertical ridge posteriorly; about 0.5 times as high as long; eyelobe with lenses; antennal notch present; anteroventral corner acute. Pereonite 1 visible laterally. Pereonite 2 not produced dorsally as tooth, but with dorsal keel; pereonites 3–5 with lateral keels. Uropod peduncles longer than pleonite 6; endopod shorter than exopod; endopod with 4 setae medially; exopod with plumose setae medially. Male. Carapace less arched than in female, vertical ridge faint; eyelobe extending beyond terminal margin of pseudorostral lobes. Pereonite 1 not visible. Uropod peduncles longer than pleonite 6, with many plumose setae medially; endopod medial margin with plumose setae proximally and short stout setae distally.
Remarks. In the New Zealand fauna, the most similar species is C. levis . Cyclaspis thomsoni has larger pitting in the carapace, giving a rugose appearance to the carapace, unlike the fine pitting and overall smooth appearance of the carapace in C. levis . Also, C. thomsoni has a vertical ridge posteriorly on the carapace, and there is no such ridge in C. levis . The adult males are the most likely to be confused, as the vertical ridge in C. thomsoni is weaker, and the carapace a little less rugose than in the female.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |