Stephanacridini Günther, 1953
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4896.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0BAD0251-42BC-4C88-BDDC-9622FD1F9F13 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4382765 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2570264F-B321-FFA9-98BC-FF79F9FEFA27 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Stephanacridini Günther, 1953 |
status |
|
Tribe Stephanacridini Günther, 1953 View in CoL
( Figs. 11 View FIGURE 11 , 12 View FIGURE 12 L-M)
Type genus: Stephanacris Redtenbacher, 1908: 441 View in CoL .
Stephanacridini Günther, 1953: 555 View in CoL .
Bradley & Galil, 1977: 194.
Hennemann & Conle, 2004: 48.
Otte & Brock, 2005: 33.
Hennemann & Conle, 2008: 54, figs. 37, 43, 60-61, 80-82.
Pharnaciini Günther, 1953: 555 View in CoL (in part).
Bradley & Galil, 1977: 193 (in part).
Otte & Brock, 2005: 32 (in part).
Diagnosis (♂, ♀): Variably sized often very large Platycraninae (body length ♂♂ 76.0– 186.5 mm, ♀♀ incl. subgenital plate 135.0-300.0 mm), shape very variable and ranging from very slender and stick-like to stocky and robust. ♂♂ apterous, brachypterous or with fully developed alae, ♀♀ mostly apterous but sometimes brachypterous with alae at best covering median segment and hardly longer than tegmina. If alae present, anal fan in ♂♂ transparent, in ♀♀ colourful. Pronotum longer than wide. Mesothorax elongate and> 3.5x longer than prothorax; always slender in ♂♂. Mesonotum and mesopleurae often armed; in ♀♀ lateral margins of mesonotum at best slightly widened and mesopleurae occasionally strongly deflexed. Abdominal segments II–VI of ♀♀ longer than wide (quadrate only in one species). All extrimities armed, occasionally with single enlarged lobes. Basitarsi slender or lobed.
Eggs ( Figs. 12 View FIGURE 12 L–M): Variable in shape, size and capsule sculpturing. Micropylar plate small, less than 2/3 the length of capsule and more or less rhomboidal in shape. Micropylar cup placed roughly in centre of plate.
Comments: Stephanacridini was originally established by Günther (1953: 555) as a tribe of the subfamily Phasminae (= Phasmatinae Bradley & Galil, 1977 ) and originally only contained the type-genus Stephanacris Redtenbacher, 1908 . The fundamental differences concerning to the morphology of the genitalia and eggs, that prove the tribe cannot be a member of Phasmatidae s. str. (= Lanceocercata) were summarized and illustrated by Hennemann & Conle (2008: 55), who transferred several misplaced genera from Pharnaciini Günther, 1953 and provided a list of genera included in Stephanacridini . However, Stephanacridini has since remained without a definite affiliation to a subfamily and is here attributed to Platycraninae sensu nov. .
The two New Guinean genera Stephanacris and Macrophasma Hennemann & Conle, 2006 have been revised by Hennemann & Conle (2006) and a revision of Phasmotaenia Návas, 1907 was presented by Hennemann & Conle (2009). A review of Nesiophasma Günther, 1934 is in progress by the author and the remaining four genera are intended to be reviewed in the future as well.
Distribution: Taiwan, Borneo, Philippines, Wallacea, New Guinea, Solomon Islands, NE-Australia, Micronesia and Melanesia ( Fiji, Tonga, Samoa, Vanuatu, New Caledonia & Western French Polynesia).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Stephanacridini Günther, 1953
Hennemann, Frank H. 2020 |
Stephanacridini Günther, 1953: 555
Gunther, K. 1953: 555 |
Pharnaciini Günther, 1953: 555
Gunther, K. 1953: 555 |