Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4092.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFAA8A37-46EE-4E8D-A86E-CA9B782E302A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6062485 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/25228795-3109-FFDD-A49C-FF6A5A45B855 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948 |
status |
|
Bathysiredon dumerilii queretarensis Maldonado Koerdell, 1948 View in CoL
Maldonado Koerdell (1948b) reported two specimens that Smith & Necker (1943) described as Ambystoma larvae. These specimens were labeled from “San Juan del Río, Guanajuato”, according to Smith & Necker (1943). But Maldonado Koerdell (1948b) stated that they were from “San Juan del Río (Qro.)”, arguing that Smith & Necker (1943) put them in the state of Guanajuato rather than in Queretaro, where a city called San Juan del Río is well known. Although there is a small town named San Juan del Río in the state of Guanajuato, in the municipality of Pénjamo (N 20.314029º, W 101.734933º, INEGI 2015) we do not believe that the specimens could have come from this locality, because there is no a lake there (only a dam, probably recently built) and the population of this town is only 38 (http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/contenido.aspx?refnac=110230632).
Maldonado Koerdell referred to these specimens as cotypes (syntypes) and described them; they are catalogued as HE 1184–1185 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A). Brandon (1992) questioned the validity of this taxon and provides ample discussion on the matter. We concur with Brandon (1992) that this taxon should be synonymized with A. dumerilii . However, the specimens shown in Figures 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A do not coincide with Maldonado-Koerdell’s description; one of us (OFV, personal notes) checked the holotypes in 1985 and his recollection is that they looked like A. dumerilii . We do not believe that specimens HE 1184–1185 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9. A D, 10A) correspond to the taxon in question. Our conclusion is that both syntypes are lost.
Current valid name: Ambystoma dumerilii (Dugès, 1870) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |