Harpilius consobrinus De Man , 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157391 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6271012 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/234E87ED-AD0F-FFB1-F54A-FE81FD3BFBBA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Harpilius consobrinus De Man , 1902 |
status |
|
Harpilius consobrinus De Man, 1902 View in CoL
Harpilius lutescens View in CoL — De Man, 1888: 536, pl. 22a fig. 1.
Harpilius consobrinus De Man, 1902: 836 View in CoL –840, pl. 26, fig. 54. Borradaile, 1917: 380 –381. Periclimenes consobrinus View in CoL — Bruce, 1972: 403, 409, 412 (key), fig. 1b. — Holthuis, 1981: 795 – 796, fig. 3 I –l. — Chace and Bruce, 1993: 107. — Li, 2000: 170 –171, fig. 211. — Li and Liu, 2004: 93.
Type material. 6 syntypes (2 ovig.), SMF8531.
Type locality. Ternate, Moluccan Islands, Indonesia.
Host. Associated with Pocillopora spp., including Pocillopora damicornis ( Bruce, 1976a) .
Distribution. Also known from Kenya, Tanganyika, Comoro Islands, Réunion, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Philippines, Western Australia, and Queensland.
Remarks. Originally described as a Harpilius , this species was placed in Periclimenes by Holthuis (1952) as a synonym of P. lutescens . It now reverts to its original name. A colour illustration is provided by Bruce (1975, p.26 fig. 16) and a figure of the ambulatory dactyl by Bruce (1976b: 54, fig. 14F). The identity of the “ Periclimenes consobrinus ” specimens reported from the Red Sea by Balss (1915) is discussed by Bruce (1992a): none are referable to H. consobrinus ( De Man) . Other specimens in the older literature may be under the name of Periclimenes lutescens .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Harpilius consobrinus De Man , 1902
Bruce, A. J. 2004 |
Harpilius consobrinus De Man , 1902 : 836
Li 2004: 93 |
Li 2000: 170 |
Chace 1993: 107 |
Holthuis 1981: 795 |
Bruce 1972: 403 |
Borradaile 1917: 380 |
Man 1902: 836 |
Harpilius lutescens
Man 1888: 536 |