Glycine

Han, Jaeyeong, Locke, Steven P, Herman, Theresa K, Schroeder, Nathan E & Hartman, Glen L, 2022, Evaluation of perennial Glycine species for response to Meloidogyne incognita, Rotylenchulus reniformis, and Pratylenchus penetrans, Journal of Nematology 54 (1), pp. 1-13 : 6

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.21307/jofnem-2022-001

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12103342

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2237878E-FFE4-1045-FCC5-F94ECAF107BF

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Glycine
status

 

Evaluation of perennial Glycine View in CoL species for resistance to P. penetrans

The Bartlett test for homogeneity of variance was significant ( P <0.05) between trials so data were analyzed separately ( Table 4 View Table 4 ). For both trials, none of the perennial Glycine View in CoL species showed reduced infection compared with the soybean varieties. For trial 1, G. clandestina PI 440960 and G. tomentella PI 339655 had significantly more nematodes per gram of root than cv. Lee 68, which had an average of 8 nematodes per gram of root. For trial 2, no accessions were significantly different from cv. Lee 68.

P

Museum National d' Histoire Naturelle, Paris (MNHN) - Vascular Plants

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Fabales

Family

Fabaceae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF