Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3390/insects13090796 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7047033 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/220587AF-FFB7-FFAC-14C8-FB2EFC781FD6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835 |
status |
|
Subfamily Ponerinae Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1835 View in CoL .
Type genus. Ponera Latreille, 1804 View in CoL .
Male diagnosis. Males of Ponerinae are best identified at the tribal level as there are as yet no clear male-based synapomorphies for the subfamily. Male Ponerinae share the following key diagnostic plesiomorphies: (1) wing venation complete or nearly complete, with at least four closed cells present; (2) petiole without tergosternal fusion; (3) abdominal segment III not petiolated; and (4) abdominal sternum IX without prongs or teeth.
Remarks. The diagnosis provided for Ponerinae above and Platythyreini and Ponerini below collectively represent a revision of the global diagnosis for the subfamily of Boudinot [ 42]. Male Ponerinae have previously been diagnosed for the Malagasy region [ 47] and Japan [ 48, 49]. No single character has been discovered yet that uniquely identifies all male Ponerinae . Presence of posterolateral processes on the petiolar sternum which contact the outer margins of the helcial tergite, recognized as a ponerine synapomorphy for the female castes [ 46], are either poorly developed in males or obscured by the petiolar tergite, thus necessitating focused study. Notably, whereas female Ponerinae display a high degree of specialization with respect to mandibular and leg characters, these are universally lacking in the conspecific male.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |