Borboropactus longidens Tang & Li, 2010
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1159.102601 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B90D030-9C99-43ED-AF4D-B729CDB89D75 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/204C8797-3379-5983-A4E9-D03825132EEB |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Borboropactus longidens Tang & Li, 2010 |
status |
|
Borboropactus longidens Tang & Li, 2010 View in CoL
Figs 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3
Borboropactus longidens Tang & Li, 2010: 21, figs 15A-D, 16A, B (♀).
Material examined.
1 ♂, 1 ♀, China, Hainan, Ledong County, Jianfengling National Natural Reserve, Mingfenggu Scenic Spot , 18°44'25.87"N, 108°50'47.83"E, 1-31 May 2021, Yunhu Mo leg. (Tho-293, ASM-JGSU) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀, Vietnam, Tam Dao National Park, Vinh Phuc, Vietnam Natural Forest , 21°29.55'N, 105°37.42'E, 1063 m, 12 September. 2007, Pham Dinh Sac leg. (IZCAS, examined by Yejie Lin) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis.
The male of this species resembles that of Borboropactus edentatus Tang & Li, 2010 (see Tang and Li 2010: 12, fig. 6A-D) by having the embolus lacking the spiralling tip, but can be easily distinguished by the round median apophysis (vs. oval in B. edentatus ), the tibia with a horn-like retrolateral apophysis as long as the tibia (vs. triangular, shorter than tibia in B. edentatus ), and lacking the dorsal apophysis (vs. present in B. edentatus ) (Figs 1G-J View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 ). The female of this new species differs from that of B. edentatus (see Tang and Li 2010: 12, fig. 7B, C) by the narrow median field (vs. lacking), the slender epigynal teeth (vs. lacking), and the L-shaped copulatory ducts (vs. oval) (Fig. 3I, J View Figure 3 ).
Description.
Male. Habitus as in Fig. 1A, B View Figure 1 . Total length 7.15, prosoma length 3.36, width 3.00, anteriorly narrowed to 0.41 × its maximum width. Eye diameters (Fig. 1C View Figure 1 ): AME 0.16, ALE 0.17, PME 0.15, PLE 0.20; interdistances: AME-AME 0.12, AME-ALE 0.14, PME-PME 0.17, PME-PLE 0.31, AME-PME 0.21, AME-PLE 0.45, ALE-ALE 0.73, PLE-PLE 1.03, ALE-PLE 0.20. MOA 0.51 long, front width 0.43, back width 0.44. Chelicerae (Fig. 1D, E View Figure 1 ) with four promarginal teeth, three retromarginal teeth, including a vestige tooth, and four small denticles in-between the teeth. Endites (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ) nearly quadrilateral, with dense setae on surface. Labium (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ) rectangular, anteriorly with strong setae. Sternum (Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ) broadly oval, with dense setae around margin. Legs measurements: I 10.58 (3.1, 1.55, 3, 2.02, 0.91); II 7.45 (2.5, 0.88, 2.32, 1.19, 0.56); III 7.63 (1.88, 0.95, 2.11, 1.91, 0.78); IV 9.22 (2.01, 1.91, 2.01, 2.16, 1.13); spination (Fig. 1A, B, F View Figure 1 ): I Fe: p2, v2; Ti: d4, v10; Mt: d3, v6; II Pa: d1; Ti: d4, v10; Mt: d2, v6; III Fe: d1; Ti: d3; Mt: d3; IV: Fe: d2; Ti: d4; Mt: d3; cusps: I Fe: 8; II Fe: 1. Opisthosoma (Fig. 1A, B View Figure 1 ) length 3.79, width 3.22, dorsally with abundant macrosetae on posterior part.
Colouration (Fig. 1A, B View Figure 1 ). Prosoma yellow to dark brown, densely covered white feathery setae, with an approximate U-shaped yellowish marking medially and dark thin radial markings around the fovea. Chelicerae, endites, and labium yellow-brown. Sternum yellow. Legs from yellow to dark brown, mottled. Opisthosoma yellow to greyish black.
Palp (Figs 1G-J View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 ). Palp with a relative long and strong retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA), extending dorsally, as long as tibia in retrolateral view; median apophysis (MA) pear-shaped, located at submedian-retrolateral of tegulum; conductor (Con) translucent, with broad base and apex, nearly as long as 1/3 of tegulum; embolus (Em) flatted-shaped, slightly less than tegular length, originating at the 6 o’clock position of tegulum, with a membranous anterior part and spine-like apex.
Female. Habitus as in Fig. 3A-D View Figure 3 . As in male except as follows. Total length 10.67, prosoma length 4.46, width 4.32, anteriorly narrowed to 0.44 × its maximum width. Eye diameters (Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ): AME 0.16, ALE 0.19, PME 0.17, PLE 0.20; interdistances: AME-AME 0.15, AME-ALE 0.27, PME-PME 0.24, PME-PLE 0.47, AME-PME 0.34, AME-PLE 0.68, ALE-ALE 0.99, PLE-PLE 1.44, ALE-PLE 0.36. MOA 0.64 long, front width 0.45, back width 0.54. Chelicerae (Fig. 3F, G View Figure 3 ) with five promarginal teeth, four retromarginal teeth, including a vestige tooth, and nine small denticles in-between teeth. Labium (Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ) wider than long. Legs (Fig. 3A-D, H View Figure 3 ) measurements: I 10.91 (3.45, 1.35, 3.35, 2.01, 0.75); II 8.73 (2.5, 1.25, 2.41, 1.88, 0.69); III 9.95 (2.67, 1.11, 2.5, 2.53, 1.14); IV 10.3 (2.75, 1.52, 2.38, 2.44, 1.21); spination (Fig. 3A-D, H View Figure 3 ): I Fe: p2; Ti: v11; Mt: d3, v6; II Ti: d3, v9; Mt: d3, v6; III Fe: d1; Ti: d4; Mt: d3; cusps: I Fe: 18; II Fe: 1; IV Fe: 1. Opisthosoma (Fig. 3C, D View Figure 3 ) length 6.21, width 5.32.
Colouration (Fig. 3A-D View Figure 3 ). Prosoma medially with a fine dark mark. Chelicerae, endites, and labium red-brown. Opisthosoma white to dark brown.
Epigyne (Fig. 3I, J View Figure 3 ). Median field (MF) flask-like, subposterior part broader than other parts; epigynal teeth (ET) very long, as long as 1/2 of median field, arising median-bilaterally; copulatory openings (CO) arising from anterior part of maximum median field; copulatory ducts (CD) broad, wider than spermathecae, both ends swollen, sloping C-shaped, located at median of vulva, anterior part widely separated by its maximum width, and posterior part are approaching each other; spermathecae (Sp) C-shaped, median part have a constriction, posterior part close touching, both ends slightly swollen.
Distribution.
Known from China (Hainan) and Vietnam (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Borboropactus longidens Tang & Li, 2010
Li, Cong-zheng, Yao, Yan-bin, Xiao, Yong-hong & Liu, Ke-ke 2023 |
Borboropactus longidens
Tang & Li 2010 |