Phanaeus bispinus Bates, 1868
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.959.2677 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:30872C13-516F-42FA-AFA7-30ADC6BF1BAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13945859 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1D507666-30F4-52CB-EF49-FBD474B1023F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phanaeus bispinus Bates, 1868 |
status |
|
Phanaeus bispinus Bates, 1868 View in CoL
Fig. 65B View Fig
Phanaeus bispinus Bates, 1868: 89 View in CoL (original description). Type locality: Ecuador: Pastaza: Pastaza: Canelos. Name-bearing type: holotype by monotypy (MNHN), not examined.
Phanaeus digitalis d’Olsoufieff, 1924: 34 View in CoL , 84, 147 (original description). Type locality: Guyana. Name-bearing type: holotype by monotypy (MNHN), not examined.
Phanaeus bispinus View in CoL – Harold 1869d: 1017 (catalog, Phanaeus bispinns [sic]). — Nevinson 1892: 2 (catalog, distribution). — Gillet 1911b: 81 (catalog, distribution). — d’Olsoufieff 1924: 34, 84, 147 (key, redescription, distribution). — Blackwelder 1944: 209 (checklist). — Frey 1963: 559 (comments). — Vulcano & Pereira 1967: 574 (key). — Arnaud 1982: 114 (list of the MNHN types). — Escobar 2000: 209 (list). — Feer 2000: 32 (list for French Guiana); 2013: 767 (list for French Guiana). — Vítolo 2000: 597 (key); 2004: 283 (diagnosis, distribution). — Medina et al. 2001: 140 (checklist). — Pulido-Herrera et al. 2003: 54 (list for Caqueta, Colombia). — Gámez 2004: 57 (list). — Hamel-Leigue et al. 2006: 17 (inventory for Bolivia); 2006: 66 (distribution). — Brûlé et al. 2011a: 193 (list); 2014: 183 (list). — Larsen 2011: 99 (list for Suriname); 2013: 97 (list for Suriname). — Krajcik 2012: 204 (checklist). — Brûlé & Touroult 2013: 41 (list). — Figueroa et al. 2014: 133 (distribution for Peru). — Nunes et al. 2014: 408–410 (cited, list). — Ratcliffe et al. 2015: 197 (list for Peru). — Silva et al. 2016: 555 (ecology, biogeography, list).
Phanaeus (Phanaeus) bispinus View in CoL – Pereira & Martínez 1956b: 237 (notes).
Phanaeus (Notiophanaeus) bispinus View in CoL – Edmonds 1994: 33, 35, 100 (key, redescription, distribution). — Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 194 (checklist for Brazil). — Arnaud 2002b: 89 (key, diagnosis). — Vítolo 2004: 283 (diagnosis). — Carvajal et al. 2011: 320–321 (list, cited for Ecuador). — Edmonds & Zídek 2012: 5, 9 (list, key). — Pacheco & Vaz-de-Mello 2015: 2 (checklist). — Boilly et al. 2016: 90, 93, 96 (list for French Guiana, key). — Chamorro et al. 2018: 97 (cited for Ecuador); 2019: 213 View Cited Treatment (catalogue). — Hielkema & Hielkema 2019: 105 View Cited Treatment (catalogue for the Guiana).
Phanaeus (Phanaeus) digitalis View in CoL – Pereira & Martínez 1956b: 237 (cited as synonym of P. bispinus View in CoL ).
Distribution
Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, French Guiana, Brazil, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia.
Subregion of Venezuela
Peneplain of the Casiquiare River –Upper Orinoco.
Literature records
Edmonds 1994: 35, 100 ( Venezuela: Amazonas). — Arnaud 2002b: 89 ( Venezuela: Amazonas). — Gámez 2004: 57 ( Venezuela). — Vítolo 2004: 283 ( Venezuela: Edmonds 1994). — Hamel-Leigue et al. 2009: 66 ( Venezuela). — Chamorro et al. 2019: 213 ( Venezuela).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phanaeus bispinus Bates, 1868
Rosa, Cecilia Lozano De La, Cupello, Mario & Vaz-De-Mello, Fernando Z. 2024 |
Phanaeus (Notiophanaeus) bispinus
Chamorro W. & Marin-Armijos D. & Asenjo A. & Vaz-De-Mello F. Z. 2019: 213 |
Hielkema A. J. & Hielkema M. A. 2019: 105 |
Chamorro W. & Marin-Armijos D. & Granda V. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. 2018: 97 |
Boilly O. & Lapeze J. & Dalens P. - H. & Giuglaris J. - L. & Touroult J. 2016: 90 |
Pacheco T. L. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. 2015: 2 |
Edmonds W. D. & Zidek J. 2012: 5 |
Carvajal V. & Villamarin S. & Ortega A. M. 2011: 320 |
Vitolo A. 2004: 283 |
Arnaud P. 2002: 89 |
Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. 2000: 194 |
Edmonds W. D. 1994: 33 |
Phanaeus (Phanaeus) bispinus
Pereira F. S. & Martinez A. 1956: 237 |
Phanaeus (Phanaeus) digitalis
Pereira F. S. & Martinez A. 1956: 237 |
Phanaeus digitalis d’Olsoufieff, 1924: 34
d'Olsoufieff G. 1924: 34 |
Phanaeus bispinus
Silva R. J. & Storck-Tonon D. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. 2016: 555 |
Ratcliffe B. C. & Jameson M. L. & Figueroa L. & Cave R. D. & Paulsen M. J. & Cano E. B. & Beza-Beza C. & Ferbans L. & Reyes-Castillo P. 2015: 197 |
Brule S. & Touroult J. & Poirier E. & Dalens P. - H. 2014: 183 |
Figueroa L. & Edmonds W. D. & Martinez N. L. 2014: 133 |
Nunes R. V. & Gigliotti de Carvalho M. S. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. & Dattilo W. & Izzo T. J. 2014: 408 |
Feer F. 2013: 767 |
Larsen T. H. 2013: 97 |
Brule S. & Touroult J. 2013: 41 |
Krajcik M. 2012: 204 |
Brule S. & Touroult J. & Dalens P. - H. 2011: 193 |
Larsen T. H. 2011: 99 |
Hamel-Leigue A. & Mann D. J. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. & Herzog S. K. 2006: 17 |
Hamel-Leigue A. & Mann D. J. & Vaz-de-Mello F. Z. & Herzog S. K. 2006: 66 |
Vitolo A. 2004: 283 |
Gamez J. 2004: 57 |
Pulido-Herrera L. A. & Canas R. A. R. & Harders F. G. & von Hildebrand P. 2003: 54 |
Medina C. A. & Lopera-Toro A. & Vitolo A. & Gill B. 2001: 140 |
Escobar F. 2000: 209 |
Feer F. 2000: 32 |
Vitolo A. L. 2000: 597 |
Arnaud P. 1982: 114 |
Vulcano M. A. & Pereira F. S. 1967: 574 |
Frey G. 1963: 559 |
Blackwelder R. E. 1944: 209 |
d'Olsoufieff G. 1924: 34 |
Gillet J. J. E. 1911: 81 |
Nevinson B. G. 1892: 2 |
Harold E. 1869: 1017 |
Phanaeus bispinus
Bates H. W. 1868: 89 |