Simulium (Hebridosimulium) spiroi Craig, Currie & Hunter, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1380.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ADA6B48B-CF5D-43A2-8E66-CA946A79A8F8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5073410 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1C1B2B5D-FFF5-FFA5-8748-FE2B4BE0F8F0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Simulium (Hebridosimulium) spiroi Craig, Currie & Hunter |
status |
sp. nov. |
Simulium (Hebridosimulium) spiroi Craig, Currie & Hunter View in CoL , n. sp.
( Figs. 10f View FIGURE 10 , 11n View FIGURE 11 , 14f View FIGURE 14 , 17f View FIGURE 17 , 19f View FIGURE 19 , 21f View FIGURE 21 )
Types
Holotype. Larva : last instar in alcohol. Label data – “ Simulium (Hebridosimulium) spiroi . VANUATU, Malekula, Wesso River Cascade. S16.37880° E167.76663°, alt. 34 m, 2.ix.2004. Coll. D. A. & R. Craig. HOLOTYPE. No. 16606” ( BPBM) GoogleMaps . Paratypes. Larvae: last instars in alcohol ( BPBM, DAC, ROM). Penultimate and earlier instar in alcohol ( BPBM, DAC, LCNZ, ROM). Label data as for Holotype, but with “ PARATYPE ” GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis
Larva: head evenly dark brown; body markedly lighter gray, posterolateral diagonal gray stripes on sixth segment. Pupa: gill petioles short.
Description
Adult female. Unknown.
Adult male. Unknown.
Pupa (based on pharate material). Thorax: cuticle with numerous granules present. Gill ( Fig. 10f View FIGURE 10 ): petioles short and thick; branching pattern (2+2) +2 +2 +2, occasionally (2+2) +2 +2 +1+1; filaments noticeably tapered; maximum length 1.4–1.8 mm.
Larva (based on 6 mature last-instar larvae). Body ( Fig. 11n View FIGURE 11 ): total length 6.5–6.9 mm; females evenly pale grey dorsally, males pale yellowish-grey with paler intersegmental regions, difference not marked. Head ( Fig. 14f View FIGURE 14 ): both sexes evenly dark brown including labral fan stalks; dorsal head spots negative, but not distinct; sockets of trichoid sensilla pair 5 and 6 markedly pale, darkly aureolate; width 0.74–0.82 mm; length 0.79–0.82 mm; distance between antennal bases 0.39–0.41 mm; ecdysial lines slightly convex, diverged markedly posteriorly, broadly rounded at maximum width; lateral margins of head convex, especially posteriorly; posterior edge of cephalic apotome slightly emarginate; postocciput with fine medial extension. Antenna: total length 0.36 mm; distal article 0.22 times as long as basal articles; markedly shorter than labral fan stalk; distal article dark brown, remainder pale. Labral fan: stalk heavily pigmented anteriorly, anterior palatal bar noticeable, but not markedly protrusive; 39–43 substantial rays, 0.84 mm in length, medial rays 0.02 mm in width, 8–10 posterolateral rays finer than others; microtrichia substantial, subequal in length to ray width, pattern distinct, with 4 or 5 shorter microtrichia between those longer. Postgenal cleft ( Fig. 17f View FIGURE 17 ): markedly arrowhead shaped; posterior edges parallel, sharply tapered at mid-length to pointed apex, 1.5 times longer than width; postgenal bridge subequal in length to cleft depth; genae evenly pigmented dark brown, paler around stemmata; ventrolateral elongate muscle spots partially negative. Hypostoma ( Fig. 19f View FIGURE 19 ): ratio 4.2; median tooth and lateral teeth prominent, latter slightly scalloped medially occasionally directed more laterally, sublateral teeth distinct; paralateral teeth and lateral serrations not obvious; 11–13 substantial hypostomal setae per side. Mandible ( Fig. 21f View FIGURE 21 ): apical tooth markedly prominent, preapical and subapical teeth not so; spinous teeth small, gap distinct; serration and sensillum robust and fused basally; blade region smooth and slightly convex. Abdomen: thorax and anterior abdominal segments subequal in width, expanded gradually to maximum width, callipygous posteroventrally; colour pale laterally and ventrally, marked diagonal gray banding laterally on sixth segment; posterodorsal tubercles absent. Posterior circlet: directed ventrally; 170–175 rows of hooks, 29–35 hooks per row (total ca. 5,500).
Additional material examined
Last and earlier instar larvae in Carnoy’s fixative. Label data – as for types (larvae; DAC) .
Etymology Dedicated to the memory of Mike “Spiro” Spironello.
Distribution VANUATU: Malekula.
Comments
Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 23c View FIGURE 23 ) on Malekula, larvae of S. spiroi appear to be habitat specialists. They were taken in moderately large numbers only from smooth travertine substrate in fast flow (1.3 m /s; Table 1). However, larvae exhibit little structural adaptation to that habitat beyond the scarcely steatopygous abdomen and a relatively large number of hooks in the posterior circlet. Superficially similar to S. adsonense in possessing a darkly pigmented larval head and lighter coloured body (rf. Figs. 11m, n View FIGURE 11 ), S. spiroi differs in the structure of the pupal gill filaments (cf. Figs. 10e, f View FIGURE 10 ), size and shape of the postgenal cleft, and markedly larger hypostomal teeth. Although grouped together with S. adsonense from Malekula, we are of the opinion that the body shape and the head colour in both species may be independent adaptations to full sunlight in shallow, fast water. Dark pigmentation of larval heads is a known adaptation to full insolation ( Craig 1997) and most likely is protective against UV light ( Donahue & Schindler 1998). Preliminary CO1 mitochondrial DNA analysis indicates that S. spiroi and S. adsonense are not genetically close (A. Cywinska, unpublished data).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |