Alipumilio athesphatus, Morales, Mírian Nunes, Massardo, Darli, Moreira, Gilson R. P. & Thompson, Christian, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.187903 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6212492 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1A52879C-FF9C-FB20-E9E2-FADDFBE62E6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Alipumilio athesphatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Alipumilio athesphatus View in CoL sp. n. Thompson
Alipumilio View in CoL species 1. Thompson 1972: 127 (male genitalia).
Description. Egg ( Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Length 1.2–1.26 mm (n = 8), maximum width 0.61 mm. White in color throughout the embryonic development. Elongated-oval in shape, rounded at both ends and slightly tapering towards the anterior pole, and laid with the micropylar axis parallel to the substrate ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). The micropyle appears as a conspicuous black crown-like on the anterior pole ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). The chorionic surface sculpturing is delicate: a plastron meshwork ( Hinton 1981) composed of longitudinally ridged cuneiform projections ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ).
Alipumilio athesphatus eggs are laid isolated into small bark crevices of S. terebinthifolius stems. Additional laboratory observation showed that soon after hatching, the larva digs a small hole and buries itself into the plant tissues below. Remains of the chorion is frequently found attached to resin exudate on S. terebinthifolius plants.
Third instar larva ( Figs 5–19 View FIGURES 5 – 9 View FIGURES 10 – 15 View FIGURES 16 – 19 ). Shape and dimensions. Length 8–16 mm (n = 10); maximum width 3mm; larva pale in color; cylindrical in cross-section, truncate anteriorly and tapering posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 9 ). Dorsal body surface coated in fine and sub-developed pubescence, patchily distributed. Anterior fold with longitudinal bands of short spicules. Sensilla accompanied by two or more setae; pattern of sensilla similar to other Syrphidae ( Rotheray & Gilbert 1999) .
Prothorax. Ventroanterior region. Antennomaxillary complex well developed ( Figs 10, 13 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ). Dorsal lip smooth, lacking setae medially ( Figs 10, 11 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ). Lateral lips little developed and covered with conspicuous setae. Cephalo-pharyngeal skeleton with a huge, black and heavily sclerotized pair of mandibular hooks ( Figs 5, 6 View FIGURES 5 – 9 , 10, 11 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ); mandibular lobes are fused on mandibular apodeme ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 9 ). Lateroanterior region. Anterior spiracles sclerotized and strongly reduced ( Figs 12, 14 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ). Dorsal region. Surface with a triangular heavily sclerotized plate, without spicules, bearing sensilla 1–3 ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ).
Mesothorax. Dorsal surface with a less sclerotised region than dorsal surface of prothorax, without spicules ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 10 – 15 ).
Abdomen. Prolegs on segments 1–7 with bearing sparse distributed crochets and lacking a planta ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 9 a). Lateral region of abdominal segments 1–8 with two pseudopodium, vertically distributed, coated by delicate setae. Dorsal surface of first segment with two tubercle of differentiated cuticle forming the opening through which the pupal spiracle will be thrust ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 9 , 15 View FIGURES 10 – 15 , 20 View FIGURES 20 – 23 ). Lappets on eighth segment have one sensillum at the tip, a second lower down and a third bifurcated towards the base ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 16 – 19 ). Posterior respiratory process dark-brown, lustrous, heavily sclerotized, bifurcated and retractile ( Figs 5, 7 View FIGURES 5 – 9 –9,17); each apical tip bearing longitudinal spiracular openings ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 16 – 19 ), with four spiracular groups of setae, one anterior, one posterior and two lateroexternal ( Fig. 18, 19 View FIGURES 16 – 19 ); base of the bifurcation, from the second and third larval instars, bearing two outer scars of the preceding spiracles ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 16 – 19 ).
Instar identification. Alipumilio athesphatus larvae pass through three larval instars, which can be identified by differences existing in the size of their respiratory processes. In the first instar, the base of the respiratory process is shorter than the arms, and to the contrary in the last (= third) instar, where the base is much greater in length. These portions of the respiratory process are similar in length in the intermediate (= second) instar ( Figs 7–9 View FIGURES 5 – 9 ).
Data resulting from measurement of the total length of the respiratory process for the different larval instars significantly adjusted to the equation ln y = 0.548x – 2.192; r = 0,978; n = 30; p <0,0 0 1. There was no overlap on such values among instars (Table 1), and thus they can also be identified by measuring that structure. The respiratory process grew geometrically at an average rate of 1.73 among instars, thus following the Brooks-Dyar rule found for several insects ( Daly 1985).
Pupa ( Figs 20–24 View FIGURES 20 – 23 View FIGURE 24 ). Cylindrical in cross section. Anterior end truncate, tapered posteriorly ( Figs 20, 21 View FIGURES 20 – 23 ). Pupal spiracles. Dark brown in color; projecting from middle of upper part of operculum, separated by distance similar to the length of one spiracle ( Figs 21–24 View FIGURES 20 – 23 View FIGURE 24 ). These processes are horn-like structures, approximately 1.2mm in length and tapering with spiracular openings clustered at lateral edges ( Figs 23 View FIGURES 20 – 23 , 24 View FIGURE 24 ). Each tubercle has from 4 to 5 oval openings ( Fig. 24 View FIGURE 24 a). Entire surface smooth, except lightly reticulated in region which is internal in the tegument.
TABLE I. Arithmetic Mean (+ Standard Error) and interval of variation (IV) for the size of the respiratory process
among larval instars of Alipumilio athesphatus sp. n. Thompson reared on Schinus terebinthifolius . N = 30 (10 larvae per
instar).
Length (mm)
Adult ( Figs 25–32 View FIGURES 25 – 28 View FIGURES 29 – 30 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ). Male. Length: body, 6.5–7.4 mm; wing, 5.1–6.3 mm (n = 10) ( Figs 25, 26 View FIGURES 25 – 28 ). Head. Black; face and gena white pilose, narrowly white pollinose ventrad to antenna, punctate on ventrolateral 1/3; frontal triangle punctate, golden pilose; vertical triangle golden pilose ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25 – 28 ); occiput yellow pilose; antenna brownish orange to black, yellow and black pilose; arista black; eye yellow and brown pilose, with brown pile narrowly along anterior edge, broadly on area of enlarged ommatidia on anterodorsal 1/2 and broadly extending to posterior edge dorsally Thorax. Black; scutum punctate, short black pilose except with yellow pilose vittae, with medial, submedial and lateral pilose vittae; scutellum black pilose except for yellow submedial pilose vitta continuous from scutum to apex of scutellum; katepisternum punctate, yellow pilose; plumula black; calypter white; halter brown. Legs. Black except metafemur dark reddish brown in holotype; coxae, trochanters and femora yellow pilose; tibiae reddish-brown pilose; tarsi reddish-brown pilose dorsally, yellow pilose ventrally. Wing. Brownish, with stigma brown, entirely microtrichose. Abdomen. Black except sterna reddish brown; first tergum short black pilose except yellow apicolaterally; second tergum yellow pilose apicolaterally and medially on basal 1/3, short black pilose elsewhere; third tergum similar to second but also with yellow pilose apicomedially; fourth tergum yellow pilose; sterna yellow pilose. Genitalia. Sparsely grayish pollinose, yellow pilose. Cercus trapezoidal in lateral view ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29 – 30 ). Surstylus broad, with a medial indentation in lateral view ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 29 – 30 ). Hypandrium dilated, ctenidion absent ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 29 – 30 ).
Female. Similar to the male, except for normal sexual dimorphism and: dichoptic ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 28 ); frons white pilose and pollinose ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 25 – 28 ); wing hyaline. Genitalia. Three spermathecae drop-like in shape ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ). Tergum VIII slightly sclerotinized ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 31 – 33 ).
Variation: The specimens from Bolivia are much darker, black instead of brownish black; their antennae are entirely black, whereas the type and other Argentinean specimen have the basoflagellomere orange. As the male genitalia are the same in the Argentinean and Bolivian specimens, we have not recognized this color difference as significant.
Remarks. Alipumilio athesphatus is easily recognized as it is the only species in the genus with a dark halter. Also, the alternating vittae of pale and dark pile on the scutum is distinctive.
Type Material. Holotype (Male). ARGENTINA. Entre Rios: Pronunciamento, December 1966, F. Walz, from the personal collection of F. C. Thompson, to be deposited in USNM, Washington.
Paratypes (11): ARGENTINA. Cordoba: Dean Funes, 24 km S of, 8 February 1951, Ross & Michelbacher (1 male, CAS). BOLIVIA. Cochabamba: Cochabamba, 17o23’3”S 66o07’N, 2610 m, 25 March 2001, A. Freidberg (5 males, 3 females CBFC, USNM). BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul: Porto Alegre, Parque Natural Morro do Osso, 18.xii.2007, D. Massardo reared from Schinus terebinthinfolius stems (1 male, 2 females, DZUP). Santa Catarina: Imbituba, 14 km north of, 27.00620°S 48.58206°W, 10 July 2008, Wheeler & McKay, reared from Schinus terebinthinfolius stems (1 male, 1 female, USNM).
Additional examined material. BRAZIL. Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre, UFRGS-Campus do Vale, D. Massardo, 7.xii.2007 (8 larvae, DZUP); 18.xii.2007 (4 larvae, DZUP); i.2008 (16 larvae, DZUP); 14.i.2008 (female, DZUP). Parque Natural Morro do Osso, D. Massardo, 27.xi.2008 (27 larvae, DZRS); 18.xii.2007 (4 males and 2 females, DZUP); xii.2007 (2 males and 2 females, DZUP).
Distribution: Brazil, Bolivia and Argentina.
Derivation of specific epithet: The epithet is derived from the Greek, athesphatos, meaning inexpressible or marvelously great ( Brown 1956: 110) and is used as an adjective.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Alipumilio athesphatus
Morales, Mírian Nunes, Massardo, Darli, Moreira, Gilson R. P. & Thompson, Christian 2009 |
Alipumilio
Thompson 1972: 127 |