Enithares intha Paiva, 1918
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5330381 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5398069 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/196E4D54-D37E-FFBD-F6A6-D8D1FC64D8EE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Enithares intha Paiva, 1918 |
status |
|
Enithares intha Paiva, 1918 View in CoL
( Figs. 10 View Figs , 16, 18 View Fig )
Enithares intha Paiva, 1918: 27 View in CoL ; LANSBURY (1968: 438); LANSBURY (1973: 228); NIESER et al. (2008: 274, 279); THIRUMALAI (2007: 43).
Material examined. MYANMAR: SHAN STATE: 2.5 km north of Mintaingbin Forest Camp, 1250 m a.s.l., 20°55.722′N 96°32.913′E, 12.+ 16.vi.2004, leg. H. Shaverdo & Myint Hlaing (149), 3 ♀♀ ( NHMW).
Distribution and notes. Until recently, Enithares intha was only known from the type series, two males, from Inle Lake, also in Shan State, Myanmar. While the identity of this species was unknown to Ivor Lansbury when preparing his revision of Enithares ( LANSBURY 1968) , he redescribed the types later ( LANSBURY 1973). THIRUMALAI (2007) recorded E. intha from Meghalaya, northeastern India, based on a personal note by J.T. Polhemus. NIESER et al. (2008) included E. intha in a key to species from Thailand and adjacent areas, referring to LANSBURY’ s (1973) redescription, without having seen further specimens. Material in NHMW consists only of females. The shape of the metaxiphus agrees well with the illustration provided by LANSBURY (1973) for males and allows identification. The females strongly resemble E. sinica (comp. Fig. 12 View Figs ) except for slightly smaller body size, for a distinct spur on the mesotrochanter ( Fig. 16 View Fig ), which is absent in E. sinica females ( Fig. 17 View Fig ) and for the shape of the metaxiphus ( Fig. 18 View Fig ), which is not expanded and has less highly elevated margins than in E. sinica ( Fig. 19 View Fig ). The small spur on the mesotrochanter distinguishes females from all species in the region.
Description of female. Body length 8.38–8.95 mm, head width 2.38–2.58 mm, median head length (in exact dorsal aspect of specimen) 1.24–1.30 mm, anterior width of vertex 1.05–1.09 mm, synthlipsis 0.48–0.51 mm, pronotum width 2.95–3.19 mm, median pronotum length 1.03–1.19 mm. Colour see Fig. 10 View Figs , extension of dark colour on mesoscutellum and hemelytra slightly varying. Head large. Vertex anteriorly convex, clearly surpassing anterior eye margin. Medial margin of pronotal foveae directed slightly laterally. Metaxiphus ( Fig. 18 View Fig ), relatively narrow, with distinctly, but not very strongly elevated sides and short apex. Mesotrochanter ( Fig. 16 View Fig ) with distinct spur similar to that of male. Metafemur without tooth.
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Enithares intha Paiva, 1918
Zettel, Herbert, Lane, David J. W., Pangantihon, Clister V., Freitag, Hendrik & Be, Jalan Tungku Link 2012 |
Enithares intha
NIESER N. & CHEN P. - P. & LEKSAWASDI P. 2008: 274 |
THIRUMALAI G. 2007: 43 |
LANSBURY I. 1973: 228 |
LANSBURY I. 1968: 438 |
PAIVA C. A. 1918: 27 |