Acerbas sarala (de Nicéville, 1889) Zhang & Cong & Shen & Grishin, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.6392056 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/183DE44C-FFA6-FFD1-AFF9-F957FA04C081 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acerbas sarala (de Nicéville, 1889) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Acerbas sarala (de Nicéville, 1889) , new combination
Parnara sarala de Nicéville, 1889 (type locality India: Khasi Hills) currently placed in Lotongus Distant, 1886 (type species Eudamus calathus Hewitson, 1876 ) is not monophyletic with it and is instead closest to the type species of Acerbas de Nicéville, 1895 (type species Hesperia anthea Hewitson, 1868 ) ( Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ). Therefore, we propose Acerbas sarala (de Nicéville, 1889) , new combination.
Carystus tetragraphus Mabille, 1891 View in CoL is a junior subjective synonym of Lotongus calathus (Hewitson, 1876) View in CoL
Inspection of the phenotype and sequencing of the Carystus tetragraphus Mabille, 1891 View in CoL (type locality “Amboine”) syntype in the ZMHB (NVG-18075G04) which agrees with the original description, bears appropriate labels and therefore we consider it to be a true syntype, reveals that it is not Borbo impar (Mabille, 1883) View in CoL , and is not even a Borbo Evans, 1949 View in CoL (type species Hesperia borbonica Boisduval, 1833 View in CoL ), but belongs to Lotongus Distant, 1886 View in CoL (type species Eudamus calathus Hewitson, 1876 View in CoL ) being placed in the tree within Lotongus View in CoL type species ( Fig. 8 View Figure 8 ). Even in the absence of the syntype, only from the original description, C. tetragraphus View in CoL does not agree with the phenotype of Borbo impar (Mabille, 1883) View in CoL . By the dark wing pattern and small spots, it fits well within Lotongus calathus (Hewitson, 1876) View in CoL , where we place this taxon. Judging from its dark phenotype, C. tetragraphus View in CoL may be Lotongus calathus parthenope (Plötz, 1886) View in CoL (type locality Nias), where we tentatively assign it. However, we are unaware of its records from the Ambon Island in Indonesia, and it is possible that the C. tetragraphus View in CoL syntype was mislabeled.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Acerbas sarala (de Nicéville, 1889)
Zhang, Jing, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui & Grishin, Nick V. 2022 |
Borbo
Evans 1949 |
Carystus tetragraphus
Mabille 1891 |
Carystus tetragraphus
Mabille 1891 |
C. tetragraphus
Mabille 1891 |
C. tetragraphus
Mabille 1891 |
C. tetragraphus
Mabille 1891 |
Lotongus
Distant 1886 |
Lotongus
Distant 1886 |
Eudamus calathus
Hewitson 1876 |
Hesperia borbonica
Boisduval 1833 |