Gryllus integer Scudder

Weissman, David B. & Gray, David A., 2019, Crickets of the genus Gryllus in the United States (Orthoptera: Gryllidae: Gryllinae), Zootaxa 4705 (1), pp. 1-277 : 101-110

Gryllus integer Scudder

Mud Crack Field Cricket

Figs 96–104 , 106 , Table 1

1901 Gryllus integer Scudder. Psyche 9: p. 268. Lectotype male ( Fig. 99 ) designated by Weissman et al. 1980: “W. Berkeley, Calif., Aug 20, 1897. S.H. Scudder coll. Gr. integer , Scudder’s type 1901. Red label, type 14065.” Specimen labeled Weiss- man and Rentz cotype #1). Type in ANSP. ‘ Gryllus VI’ of Weissman & Rentz (1977a) and Rentz & Weissman (1981). G. integer (in part) of Weissman et al. (1980). ‘ Gryllus #6’ of DBW notebooks.

Distribution. California (except for southeastern deserts) north into Washington, east into Idaho and Wyoming and south into western Colorado, northern and central Utah, and Nevada ( Fig. 100 ). Also known from 5 California Channel Islands.

Recognition characters and song. A medium sized, short hind femur, always solid black headed, long and narrow tegmina, long hind winged cricket. Song usually with intermittent bursts of 3 (range 2–4) p/c, usually without an introductory, short trill ( Figs 101 , 102 ; R 16-60, S16-21 ), 1000 c/m, PR usually>70. But these general patterns are not fixed in that many populations are a composite of calls including individuals with a pure trill (discussed below), a short introductory trill that changes to 3p/c, and a 2p/c song. Morphologically indistinguishable from sister species G. armatus but separated by habitat and geography, slight song differences, and consistent DNA differences, as follows: (1) G. armatus is from hotter, more southern desert US locations (see Fig. 100 ); (2) Most, but not all G. armatus , have an “introductory trill” of 2–8 evenly spaced pulses at the beginning of each burst of chirps (see Fig. 108 , p. 114 ), usually followed by 2 (range 1–3) p/c until that burst is over. In contrast, G. integer usually with no introductory trill and 3 p/c, although some males sing with 2–4p/c); and (3) there is a congruent, and consistent association between those males with 2p/c and parallel differences in the ITS2 gene sequences when compared with G. integer (see Fig. 98 ). In distribution map ( Fig. 100 ), note a possible area of hybridization in the Four Corners area of southeastern Utah, west-central Colorado, and north-eastern Arizona where males sing more like G. armatus but possess G. integer DNA. In this paper, we arbitrarily give priority to the DNA and consider such populations to be G. integer . Nevertheless, it is the extensive DNA/song correspondence that ultimately convinced us to consider these two taxa as different and preserve both of Scudder’s names.

Derivation of name. “integer” in Latin means whole, entire, sound ( Brown 1956). From Scudder’s original description, we have no indication why he chose this name. While the common name “western stutter-trilling field cricket” has been used for many years (Weissman et al. 1980; Walker 2019), the song, except for in a few rare individuals, is not a trill but consists of 2 to 4 closely group pulses. In the field, especially at warm temperatures, the song can resemble an uneven trill. The common name “stutter triller” is more appropriate for G. cohni from Arizona, which has an irregular trill song. We thus adopt a new common name for G. integer in this paper.

Geographic range. ( Fig. 100 ). Usually sporadically distributed but can be locally common. Not known from the hot Southwestern Sonoran and Chihuahuan Deserts where it is replaced by G. armatus , but does occupy the Great Basin Desert and the western part of the Mohave Desert. DC Lightfoot has kindly allowed us to examine some 25 specimens he collected in the Oregon Counties of Harney , Malheur, and Wasco during the early 1980s. While these are morphologically highly suggestive of G. integer , none have associated recordings. We believe his specimens indicate a more widespread distribution of this taxon east of the Cascades in Oregon .

Habitat. From sea level to 1950m (Mono Lake, CA, S78-123 & S78-125). Usually in towns but associated with a variety of microhabitats: watered lawns, dry grassy fields, garbage dump areas, cracks in concrete and dry ground, around florescent lights at gas stations, and mud-soil cracks in dry lake beds (Mono Lake, CA, S78-123 & S78-125; Washoe Co., NV, S83-49; Lake Lenore, WA, S04-60).

Life cycle and seasonal occurrence. No egg diapause: Stanford, CA (S92-45); Colusa Co. , CA (S15-80); Sacramento River SRA, CA (S15-81). Two generations/year in southern populations but doubt such in more northern localities.

Variation. Color: Individual crickets, especially second-generation ones from hot climates like the California Central Valley, can have a distinctive two-tone contrasting appearance: black head and pronotum coupled with beige/straw colored tegmina ( Fig. 99 ) and legs. In certain individuals, even the pronotum can be beige/straw colored. Hind wing length: Always with long hind wings although these have been occasionally shed in field-collected adult males (Weissman et al. 1980). Of 133 studied G. integer males, all but 9 had intact long hind wings. All those without long hind wings were, in fact, dealate, a condition discussed elsewhere for Acheta domesticus ( Weissman & Rentz 1977b, Walker 1977) where both hind wings are shed. This condition is easily diagnosed in those males whose right tegmen has been removed for file analysis. Interestingly, in two populations found away from humans (Mono Lake, CA, S78-123 & S78-125, & Lake Lenore, WA, S04-60), where individuals were living in cracks in dry mud flats with short grass, 4 of 6 males (S78-123 & S78-125) and 1 of 5 males (S04-60) had lost their hind wings. In contrast 6 males from a similar habitat (Washoe Co., NV, S83-49) all had unshed, long hind wings. At some localities, female G. integer may be difficult to assign to species. In those situations where we can make such assignments, no female, of 83 collected, was dealate. Ovipositor length: The 3 females from Wyoming (S11-72) have the longest ovipositors (range 14.3–17.8 mm) of any population of this species, perhaps reflecting the cold winters there and the need to deposit eggs deep in the soil. Pronotum dimensions: Scudder (1901) noted that the pronotum is nearly twice as broad as long. While this condition exists in some individuals, it is not universal, and certainly not diagnostic for this species. Song: Variable, but usually without an introductory trill and 3p/c. In other cases, G. integer can have a short introductory trill of 1-3 pulses followed by 2–4p/c and, rarely, a pure trill (Fallon, NV, S98-95, R98-123, Fig. 103 ). A male from Riverton, WY (S11-73) sang with 4 pulses in all chirps. In the face of such variation, multiple male analysis from the same population will usually give a definitive answer.

Specimens examined. California: Colusa Co., Sacramento River SRA, 96’, 18-vii-2015 (S15-81). 13m S Willows, 29-viii-2003, 120’ (S03-87). I5 overpass area at Hwy 20, 19m, 18-vii-2015 (S15-80). Fresno Co., Coalinga, 29-viii-1998 (S98-86). Jacalitos Canyon, 29-viii-1998, 820’ (S98-83); 4-v-2003 (S03-31). Inyo Co., Bishop , 28- viii-2005, 4450’ (S05-99). Lone Pine, 3500’, 5-viii-1978 (S78-117), Mono Lake, 3 m S Lee Vining off Test Station Road, 6400’, 6-viii-1978 (S78-123 & 125). Kern Co., Sand Ridge 3-5.8 m E Edison, 1000’, 22-xii-1983 (S83-163); Hwy 178 19.4 m W Hwy 14, 3064’, 21-vii-2015 (S15-95). Lake Co., Clearlake Oaks, 5-viii-2014, 1428’ (S14- 63). Los Angeles Co., Santa Catalina Island, Toyon Canyon, 9-x-1983, S. Bennett. Madera Co., Hwy 41 6.2 m E Fresno Co. line, 457’, 20-vii-2015 (S15-91). Mendocino Co., Willets, 1300’, 2-viii-1980 (S80-58). Monterey Co., King City, 23-viii-1978. Sacramento Co., Folsom, 174’, 19-vii-2015 (S15-87). San Luis Obispo Co., Montana de Oro State Park, 24-viii-2006 (S06-97). Santa Barbara Co., San Miguel Island, Cuyler Harbor, 31-viii-1978, S.E. Miller; Santa Barbara Island, widespread, iv-1979, SBMNH; Santa Cruz Island, Stanton Ranch. Santa Clara Co., Los Gatos, 12-viii-2006 (S06-72). Stanford University, Lake Lagunita, 2-v-1992 (S92-45). Shasta Co. Lake Shasta Dam area, 4-viii-1980 (S80-66 & 67). Tulare Co., Hwy 198 4.4 air miles E Lemon Cove, 725’, 29-vi-2016 (S16- 21). Ventura Co., San Nicolas Island, Navy Barracks area, 16-viii-1978. Yolo Co., University of California, Davis, 1-ix-2003 (S03-101). I5 near intersection Hwy 505. 18-viii-2006, 130’ (S06-77). Shasta Co., Redding, 29-vi-1992. Colorado: Garfield Co., Rifle, 15-viii-2009, 5140’ (S09-109). Mesa Co., Fruita, 16-viii-2009, 4420’ (S09-114). Idaho: Owyhee Co., 2m N Bruneau, 12-vi-2004, 2900’ (S04-40). 2m S Bruneau, 7-vi-1996, 2600’ (S96-37). Mt. Home, 3260’, 7-vi-1996 (S96-41); 26-vi-2014 (S14-31). 13m SE Mt. Home, 7-vi-1996, 2780’ (S96-40). Nevada: Churchill Co., Fallon, 16-ix-1998, 4000’ (S98-95); 14-ix-2012 (S12-116). Stillwater National Wildlife Refuge, 1- iii-2005, 3940’ (S05-23). Humboldt Co., Paradise Valley, 8-vi-1996, 4600’ (S96-42). Lyon Co., Weeks, 19-iv-1998, 4320’ (S98-32). Mineral Co., Hawthorne, 26-vi-1992, 4320’ (S92-65). Schurz, 27-vi-1992, 4000’ (S92-66). Pershing Co., Rye Patch State Rec Area, 27-vi-1992, 4050’ (S92-67). Washoe Co., Hwy 447 18m NW Gerlach, 3-vi-1983, 4700’ (S83-49). White Pine Co., Baker, 9-vi-1996, 5380’ (S96-49). Oregon: Harney Co., Burns, 2-vi-1997, 4020’ (S97-51). Fields, 28-vi-1992, 4300’ (S92-69). Hwy 205 16.6m NW Fields, 2-vi-1997, 4720’ (S97-52). Jackson Co., Emigrant Lake Recreational Area, 27-vii-1992, 1800’ (S92-82). Lake Co., Lakeview, 4700’ (S92-71), 28-vi-1992. Warner Valley, 12 m N Plush, 24-vi-2014, 4509’, 42° 34’ 24.0 -119° 53’ 03.3” (S14-26); 17m NE Plush, 16-vi- 2004, 4700’ (S04-55). Utah: Emery Co., Green River, 4350’, 21-vi-1987 (S87-55). Garfield Co., Hwy 276 7.4 m N Bullfrog Marina, 37.6309° -110.7211°, 27-vii-2003, 3900’. Millard Co., 2.05 m NW Flowell, 20-v-2017, 4653’ (S17-6). Tooele Co., Tooele, 30-vii-1992, 5100’ (S92-94). 12m N Tooele, 20-vi-1987, 4500’ (S87-51). Wayne Co., Hanksville, 1-viii-1992, 4500’ (S92-109); 19-v-2001 (S01-37); 12-ix-2004 (S04-128); Hwy 24 2.5m W Hanksville, 29-viii-2017, 38.3737° -110.751°. Washington: Grant Co., Lake Lenore, Hwy 17, mile post 84.8, 9m N Soap Lake, 19-vi-2004, 1020’ (S04-60). Wyoming: Fremont Co., Riverton, 18-vii-2011 (S11-73). Shoshoni, 18-vii-2011, 4849’ (S11-72).

DNA. Multilocus G3416 (Tulare Co., CA, S16-21) and 2003-039 (7.4 m N Bullfrog Marina, UT—site of specimens with G. integer DNA and G. armatus song), closest in tree to sister species G. armatus (Gray et al. 2019) . ITS2 genetic distances ( Fig. 98 ) within and between G. integer and G. armatus are described under G. armatus (p. 116). 16S also shows a clear separation between G. integer and G. armatus , with two 16S clades within G. armatus ( Fig. 104 ).

Discussion. Our initial 16S genetic data showed clear separation between G. integer and G. armatus , but given our previous documentation of 16S clades in other species, such as G. vernalis , G. veletis , and G. lightfooti , we were unsure of its significance with these two taxa. With the subsequent analysis of the ITS2 gene, such separation was again confirmed (see Fig. 98 ): that is, individual G. integer and G. armatus are similarly and consistently different from each other for both 16S and ITS2 sequences. Nevertheless, we found four populations along the song-boundary suture zone between G. integer and G. armatus , that have both G. integer 16S and ITS2 DNA and a mostly G. armatus song: (1) Of 2 males recorded from Fruita, CO (S09-114), both had G. integer DNA. One male had an introductory trill followed by 3p/c and the second male had an introductory trill usually followed by 3p/c but occasionally by 2 or 4 p/c. A male from nearby Rifle, CO (S09-109) had typical G. integer DNA and a G. integer song with no introductory trill and 3p/c. (2) At Winslow, Arizona, the ITS2 DNA is definitely G. integer but of 11 males recorded from there during 2003 (10-viii-2003), 2010 (10-viii-2010), and 2012 (27-vii-2012), we found the following: 3 males had no introductory trill and 2p/c and 8 males had a short (1-4 pulses) introductory trill followed by 2p/c. Based only on song, we would classify this population as G. armatus but per our convention of giving priority to the DNA results, we label this population as G. integer . (3) Of 25 males recorded in 2003 (collected 27-vii-2003) from Garfield Co., UT, Hwy 276 some 7.4 m N Bullfrog Marina (= 3.2 m S Ticaboo): 17 males had no introductory trill and 2 (rarely 3) p/c while 7 males had introductory trills followed by 2 (rarely 3) p/c; one male had zero or one introductory pulse and then 2–3 p/c. The ITS2 sequence of 4 males all mapped with G. integer . (4) Of 10 1992 males recorded from Hanksville, UT (S92-109), 9 sang with 2–3p/c, without an introductory trill, and the tenth male sang an introductory trill followed by 2–3p/c. In 2004 (S04-128), all 3 recorded Hanksville males had introductory trills usually followed by 3 (range 2–4) p/c. The latter’s DNA (G370) mapped with G. integer as did a male (EC3035) from 4 km W Hanksville on Hwy 24, who had an introductory trill and then 2p/c.

We have done some preliminary crossing trials between G. integer and G. armatus : (1) G. integer from Santa Clara Co., CA (S92-45, no introductory trill and all 3p/c) x G. armatus from Dona Ana Co., NM (S92-127, all with an introductory trill converting to 2p/c). Two of three crosses involving CA males x NM virgin females resulted in good egg hatches. One of four crosses involving CA virgin females x NM males resulted in a good egg hatch. (2) Two virgin G. integer females from Yolo Co., CA (S04-36, males with no introductory trill but all 3p/c) x Dona Ana Co., NM (S04-37, all males with an introductory trill converting to 2p/c), produced eggs. Only 2 eggs hatched in one cross and no eggs hatched in the second cross. (3) Four crosses (two reciprocals of each sex) were conducted between F 1 G. integer, Lake Co. , CA (S14-63) x F 1 G. armatus, Dona Ana Co. , NM (collected in 2014), and all four crosses yielded good hatches while incubated at 27°C and 12L/12D. The adults were paired from 17-xi-2014 to 19- xi with eggs hatching 16-xii-2014, which is some 10 days longer than typical incubation periods seen in species with no egg diapause, although cooler ambient temperatures probably contributed to the delayed hatch. More controlled crosses could help clarify this situation, but these data certainly suggest compatibility between these two-sister taxa. On the other hand, laboratory hybridization is known in other sister pairs of Gryllus (e.g., Alexander 1957, Harrison 1986, Walker 2000).

Smith & Cade (1987) unsuccessfully tried crossing Davis, CA, G. integer (3p/c) with Austin, TX, G. texensis . Cade & Tyshenko (1990) reported that crosses of Las Cruces, NM, G. armatus (introductory trill to 2p/c) x Austin, TX, G. texensis resulted in limited offspring, and only when the female was G. armatus . Neither tried crossing California G. integer with New Mexico G. armatus .

Individuals, especially those at gas stations at night, can fly well. This vagility may also explain their presence on 5 of 8 California Channel Islands, although accidental introduction by human commerce can’t be ruled out. We have no information as to whether or not sustaining populations exist on these islands.

Parasitic tachinids Exoristoides johnsoni emerged from 2 of 5 males from Fallon, NV (S98-95). O’Hara and Gray (2004) report this same tachinid emerging from a Holbrook, AZ cricket identified as G. integer ; given the proximity of Holbrook to localities (e.g. Winslow, AZ) where crickets can be found with G. integer DNA and G. armatus song, and giving priority to DNA, the Holbrook host cricket likely is G. integer but we cannot completely rule out it being G. armatus .

This cricket has been used in studies on female response to male song ( Hedrick & Weber 1998), olfactory discrimination ( Kortet & Hedrick 2005, Leonard & Hedrick 2009), behavior ( Hedrick et al. 2002; Hedrick & Kortet 2006, Niemelä et al. 2012 a, b, Hedrick 2013, Hedrick & Bunting 2014), and life history parameters and immune response ( Niemelä et al. 2012c).

Figures

FIGURE 16. One second spectrogram of G. locorojo, same male as in Fig. 15.

FIGURE 17. ITS2 gene tree. G. brevicaudus samples: S03-8 (G5); S16-1 (G3354, G3393); G. insularis samples: Guadalupe Island, Baja California Norte, Mexico; G. bryanti samples: Andros Island, Bahamas; G. alexanderi sample: Clarion Island, Colima, Mexico.

FIGURE 18. Holotype male, and labels, of G. brevicaudus.

FIGURE 19. Top: Live male (Jasper Ridge, S92-44) G. brevicaudus showing distinctive yellow-orange markings that contrast with rest of black cricket. Bottom: Female from Palo Alto, CA (S87-33) showing short ovipositor.

FIGURE 20. Five second waveform (A) and one second spectrogram (B) of calling song (R03-8) of G. brevicaudus from San Benito Co., CA (S03-8), recorded at 24.5°C.

FIGURE 21. Known distribution for G. brevicaudus. Star shows type locality.

FIGURE 22. Left Panel: G. bryanti (on left) vs. sympatric G. assimilis (right), both from Bahamas. Note head wider than pronotum in G. bryanti. Right Panel: Three second waveform of typical single-pulse chirp calling song of G. bryanti (neotype male, GBM08, Andros Island, at 25 °C).

FIGURE 23. Male holotype (right) and female allotype (left) G. ovisopis.

FIGURE 24. Holotype male (left), G. thinos. Female (right) from type locality showing typical, linear head stripes.

FIGURE 25. Calling song of G. thinos (R07-125) Cameron Co., TX (S07-25), at 25°C: (A) five second waveform, (B) one second spectrogram.

FIGURE 26. Known distribution of G. thinos.

FIGURE 27. ITS2 gene tree showing some separation between Padre Island and Boca Chica samples of G. thinos.

FIGURE 28. Five second waveforms of calling songs of (A) G. pennsylvanicus and (B) G. firmus. G. pennsylvanicus (R04-110) Whatcom Co., WA (S04-91), at 25°C. G. firmus: (R03-255) Gainesville, FL (S03-85), at 25°C.

FIGURE 29. One second spectrograms of (A) G. pennsylvanicus and (B) G. firmus; same males as in Fig. 28.

FIGURE 30. ITS2 gene tree. G. firmus samples: S03-85 (G60, G61, G62); S07-25 (G1073, G1074); S07-26 (G1186, G1235); S10-63 (G1920, G1922); S10-67 (G1915); S11-29 (G2165, G2029, G2034); S13-41 (G2709); S13-59 (G2716); G. pennsylvanicus samples: S08-74 (G709, G710); S11-107 (G2208); S11-108 (G2211).

FIGURE 31. Five second calling song of G. pennsylvanicus (R04-110) Whatcom Co., WA (S04-91), at 25°C.

FIGURE 32. Populations of G. pennsylvanicus studied by us.

FIGURE 33. Size differences, in G. pennsylvanicus, between northern (right) from Berrien Co., Michigan, and southern (left) from Saline Co., KS [S02-49]).

FIGURE 34. Map of G. pennsylvanicus showing variation in file tooth number across the United States. File teeth range from 124 (Vancouver, S00-54)) to 223 (Oklahoma City, S02-48).

FIGURE 35. Long ovipositor G. pennsylvanicus from Saline Co., KS (S02-49).

FIGURE 36. Regression G. pennsylvanicus showing a weak correlation between number of file teeth and hind femur length, the latter a proxy for body size.

FIGURE 37. Regression G. pennsylvanicus vs. G. veletis demonstrating longer ovipositors in the former taxa. Specimens from only the 6 localities discussed in text.

FIGURE 38. Lectotype male, G. firmus, specimen and labels.

FIGURE 39. Populations of G. firmus that we studied.

FIGURE 40. Five second calling song in G. firmus: (R03-255) Gainesville, FL (S03-85), at 25°C.

FIGURE 41. Color variation in Texas G. firmus: lighter, coastal specimens, with head stripes (2 upper photos and lower left), Cameron Co., TX, S07-26 vs. darker, inland specimen (lower right, Schulenburg, TX, S10-65).

FIGURE 42. Egg hatch from single field collected G. firmus (S13-65) from near Schulenburg, TX, showing a mixed egg diapause pattern.

FIGURE 43. Regression file tooth number vs. length hind femur in ‘G. #19’ vs. ‘G. near #19.’

FIGURE 44. Regression length ovipositor vs. length hind femur in ‘G. #19’ vs. ‘G. near #19.’

FIGURE 45. Regression body length vs. ovipositor length using combined data for G. firmus and G. pennsylvanicus from Larson et al. (2013).

FIGURE 46. Regression pronotal width vs. ovipositor length using combined data for G. firmus and G. pennsylvanicus from Larson et al. (2013).

FIGURE 47. Regression hind femur length vs. ovipositor length using combined data for G. firmus and G. pennsylvanicus from Larson et al. (2013).

FIGURE 48. Regression hind femur length vs. ovipositor length in G. firmus vs. G. pennsylvanicus.

FIGURE 49. Regression cercus length vs. ovipositor length in G. firmus vs. G. pennsylvanicus.

FIGURE 50. Regression cercus length vs. hind femur length in G. firmus vs. G. pennsylvanicus.

FIGURE 51. Regression number of file teeth vs. pulse rate in G. firmus.

FIGURE. 52. Regression number of file teeth vs. pulse rate in G. pennsylvanicus showing males with higher numbers of file teeth have lower pulse rates.

FIGURE 53. Regression number of file teeth vs. pulse rate for combined comparison between G. firmus and G. pennsylvanicus.

FIGURE 54. ITS2 gene tree. G. multipulsator sample: S03-41 (G577); G. assimilis samples: S10-64 (G1901); S16-12 (G3367, G3373); G. locorojo sample: type locality (Rainbow Mealworms); G. veintinueve samples: S02-39 (G134); S07-21 (G1139); S07-27 (G1140, G1211); S09-71 (G1451); OK, Love Co., Hwy 32 at Boggy Creek (2015-055).

FIGURE 55. Five second waveform (A) and one second spectrogram (B) of calling song (R09-89) of G. veintinueve from type locality (S09-71), recorded at 25°C.

FIGURE 56. Regression width pronotum vs. length hind femur in G. veintinueve vs. sympatric G. veletis, showing near morphological separation.

FIGURE 57. ITS2 gene tree. G. veintinueve samples: S02-39 (G134); S07-21 (G1139); S07-27 (G1140, G1211); S09-71 (G1451); OK, Love Co., Hwy 32 at Boggy Creek (2015-055). G. vernalis samples: S03-56 (G27, G1739); S03-62 (G31, G33). G. fultoni samples: S03-62 (G32, G34); S03-64 (G35), S07-22 (G1138). G. veletis samples: S03-58 (G39); S03-60 (G30); S15-9 (G2939); S15-16 (G2927, G2934); S15-21 (G2899); S15-24 (G2936); S15-25 (G2963, G2968, G2983); S15-53 (G3304, G3343).

FIGURE 58. Holotype male (left), G. veintinueve, paratype (middle) female (S09-71), and color variant (right) male (S02- 46).

FIGURE 59.. Known US distribution of G. veintinueve.

FIGURE 60. Five second waveforms of calling songs of (A) G. assimilis and (B) G. multipulsator. (A) G. assimilis: (R13-231) Rio Hondo, TX (S13-44), at 25°C; (B) G. multipulsator: (R15-325) Pima Co., AZ (S15-108), at 25.4°C.

FIGURE 96. Five second waveforms of typical calling songs of (A) G. integer, (B) G. armatus with introductory trill, and (C) G. armatus without introductory trill. (A) G. integer: (R16-60) Tulare Co., CA (S16-21), at 24.2°C; (B) G. armatus: (R15-177) Artesia, NM (S15-58), at 25.1°C; (C) G. armatus (2003-170) Bernalillo Co., NM, at 20.6°C.

FIGURE 97. One second spectrograms of (A) G. integer, (B) G. armatus, and (C) G. armatus; same male recordings as in Fig. 96.

FIGURE 98. ITS2 gene tree and distribution map for both G. armatus and G. integer showing both geographic separation and zone of possible hybridization. Collection stop numbers for G. armatus: S04-121 (G358, G359); S05-110 (G511, G512, G513, G515); S07-26 (G1165); S07-33 (G1077); S07-79 (G1228); S10-62 (G1918); S10-63 (G1899); S11-90 (G2172); S12- 36 (G2264); S12-104 (G2411); S13-18 (G2473); S13-46 (G2566); S15-54 (G3096, G3077, G3081); S15-71 (G3101, G3074); S15-73 (G3072); Albuquerque, NM (2003-175); Cordes Junction, AZ (2006-241); Agua Fria, AZ (2006-244). Collection stop numbers for G. integer: S03-100 (G58, G59); S04-36 (G243); S04-40 (G210); S0455 (G245, G246); S04-60 (G218); S04-128 (G370); S05-23 (G477); S05-99 (G499); S06-77 (G629); S09-109 (G1439); S09-114 (G1441, G1445); S11-72 (G2113, G2148); S11-73 (G2143); S12-116 (G2431); S15-80 (G3195, G3316); S15-91 (G3178, G3265); S15-95 (G3292); S16-21 (G3416); S17-6 (G3502, G3525); S16-5 (G3374, G3381); S16-12 (G3366); Hwy 276 mile 30 Sinclair Gas, Garfield Co., UT (2003-038, 2003-039, 2003-041); Winslow, AZ (2003-312, 2012-029, 2012-030, 2012-031, 2012-032).

FIGURE 99. Lectotype male, G. integer, specimen and labels.

FIGURE 100. Known US distribution, G. integer, along with sister species G. armatus, showing zone of possible hybridization in the Four Corners area.

FIGURE 101. Five second waveform of typical calling song of G. integer (R16-60) Tulare Co., CA (S16-21), at 24.2°C.

FIGURE 102. One second waveform of typical calling song of G. integer (R16-60) Tulare Co., CA (S16-21), at 24.2°C revealing the typical fast 3 pulse/chirp structure.

FIGURE 103. Anomalous song (top) of G. integer (R98-123) Churchill Co., NV (S98-95), at 25°C, without distinctive 3 pulse chirp structure. Spectrogram (bottom) of same male, but note different time scale.

FIGURE 104. 16S gene tree with G. integer samples in blue and G. armatus samples in purple. Locality information follows all ID numbers. Note the two 16S clades within G. armatus.

FIGURE 106. Known US distribution, G. armatus, along with sister species G. integer, showing zone of possible hybridization in the Four Corners area.

FIGURE 108. One second waveforms of typical calling song of G. armatus, same males as in Fig. 107, showing presence (top) and absence (bottom) of an introductory trill in a burst.

FIGURE 114. One second spectrograms of (A) G. fultoni and (B) G. vernalis, same males as in Fig. 113.