Ptilocerus kanoi Esaki, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5328439 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5395727 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/176D8781-FF96-B61E-F7FE-FCA92714C2F8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ptilocerus kanoi Esaki, 1931 |
status |
|
Ptilocerus kanoi Esaki, 1931 View in CoL
( Figs. 54–64 View Figs View Figs , 66 View Figs )
Ptilocerus kanoi Esaki, 1931: 261 View in CoL . HOLOTYPE: ♂, [ Taiwan:] ‘ Urai’ [= Wulai]; KUEC.
References. ESAKI (1932): 1655 (redescription, habitus illustration); KATO (1933):[plate 22] (colour photo); HSIAO & REN (1981): 411 (redescription); MALDONADO CAPRILES (1990): 339 (catalogue, distribution); PUTSHKOV & PUTSHKOV (1996): 171 (catalogue, distribution); LIN (2003): 128 (listed, distribution).
Specimens examined. TAIWAN: TAIPEI CITY: ‘ Sôzan’ [= Yangmingshan], 16.v.1937, leg. M. Chujo (1 ♀, NTU). TAIPEI COUNTY: ‘ Taihoku’ [= Taipei], 27.iv.1931, leg. J. Sonan (1 ♂ [ Figs. 54–60 View Figs View Figs ], NTU) ; same locality, 19.iv.1932, leg. R. Takahashi (1 ♂ [ Figs. 61–64 View Figs ], NTU) ; same locality, 1. iv.1940, leg. Musayama (1 ♂, NTU) ; ‘ Wulai, Taipei’, 20.iii.1963, leg. K.S. Lin (1 ♂, TARI). NANTOU COUNTY: Lienhuachih , 31.vii.2008, leg. H.T. Shih (1 ♂, TARI) .
Diagnosis. The species can be distinguished from other speces of Ptilocerus by the combination of the following characters: pronotum broad, humeral angles dilated; fore wing ( Fig. 66 View Figs ) with corium short, occupying about one fourth of total length of wing; anterior margin of membrane nearly straight, apices of membranes of the two wings directed caudolaterad and not overlapping in resting position of wings; membrane with several irregularly distributed, small, rounded, light spots; venation simple, without reticulate veins. The species seems related to P. guttifer (Walker, 1873) (Borneo) and P. venosus (Walker, 1873) ( Singapore) by the structure of the wing (anterior margin of membrane straight, corium very short), but it is easy to distinguish from these by the simple venation and the strongly different colour pattern of the wing.
Redescription of pregenital abdomen and genitalia. Pregenital abdomen (♂, ♀) rounded in dorsal view (♂: Fig. 54 View Figs ), sternites III–VI each with a short median longitudinal ridge ( Fig. 55 View Figs ); epipleurites VII of male fused along midline posteriad to tergite (= mediotergite) VII; segment VIII of male membranous dorsally. Male genitalia. Genital capsule ( Figs. 57–58 View Figs ) elongate, dorsally membranous, anterior and posterior apertures not separated by distinct dorsal sclerotized bridge-like portion therefore seemingly confluent. Parameres ( Figs. 59–60 View Figs ) curved, curved portion provided with hair sensilla, apical one-fourth forming an elongate, apically obtusely truncate process. Phallus ( Figs. 61–64 View Figs ): articulatory apparatus ( Fig. 64 View Figs ) small, restricted to the extreme base of the phallus; basal plates short, thick; support bridge complex with 2+2 capitate processes of lateral position, continued in 1+1 greatly elongate, narrow support bridge prolongations ( Fig. 64 View Figs : sbp) separated at base but adjacent at most of their length; phallosoma with a large, membranous basal aula ( Fig. 61 View Figs : ba) provided with a pedicel ( Fig. 61 View Figs : ped); phallotheca elongate, with a dorsal sclerotized plate ( Fig. 61 View Figs : dsp); phallotheca mouth situated ventrally, relatively far from the apex of the phallotheca; endosoma tubular, membranous, with processes as follows: 1+1 struts subdivided into two portions: basal portions ( Figs. 61–62 View Figs : strb) thick, broadened towards apex, apical portions ( Figs. 61–62 View Figs : stra) articulated to apex of basal portions of struts, thickened and curved basally, elongate, whiplike, narrowing towards apex, far protruding from phallotheca; 1+1 elongate lateral sclerites ( Figs. 61–62 View Figs : lsc); 1+1 elongate, membranous lobes, their basal portions surrounding bases of apical portions of struts ( Fig. 63 View Figs ).
Distribution. Taiwan!
TARI |
Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ptilocerus kanoi Esaki, 1931
Rédei, Dávid & Tsai, Jing-Fu 2011 |
Ptilocerus kanoi
ESAKI T. 1931: 261 |