Symmachia probetor ( Stoll, 1782 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5174672 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5187344 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/175C87D3-FFC4-F43C-FF3C-78C9FD02FA18 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Symmachia probetor ( Stoll, 1782 ) |
status |
|
Symmachia probetor ( Stoll, 1782)
( Fig. 7-8 View Figures 5-38 , 39 View Figures 39-40 , 42)
A single damaged male was collected at the hilltop at 14:00h flying about five meters from the ground and apparently competing for territory with S. estellina Gallard, 2008 in a small patch of sun. The time of sampling differs from records mentioned by Gallard (2008) for this species in French Guiana.
Although superficially similar, there are a number of characteristics of the wing shape, pattern, and male genitalia that seem to distinguish S. probetor and S. estellina : the forewing of S. probetor is rounded at the apex and convex at the outer margin and there is no white or translucent spots close to the curve of the costal margin, which is weakly developed when compared to S. estellina ( Fig. 39-40 View Figures 39-40 ). These characteristics can be observed in the type illustration of S. probetor given by Stoll (1782). The male genitalia of S. probetor is generally larger, the saccus is shorter and the posterior margin of the tegumen is more projected and bilobed medially in dorsal view. Perhaps most conspicuously, the cornuti are undeveloped in S. probetor ( Fig. 42) but developed in S. estellina ( Fig. 43) ( S. probetor , n=2; S. estellina , n=6).
We think there is possibly a complex of several similar looking species lumped under S. probetor , with some of the recognized subspecies and synonyms perhaps corresponding to valid species, in addition to the possibility of undescribed taxa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.