Cyana adelina ( Staudinger, 1887 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5323.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E5A4DE3-707C-489C-9DD5-B8059A70AB5A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8212386 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1641BB3D-7312-E203-84AD-154C8E076C5C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyana adelina ( Staudinger, 1887 ) |
status |
|
Cyana adelina ( Staudinger, 1887) View in CoL
( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–8 , 34 View FIGURES 34–37 , 49 View FIGURES 49–53 )
Bizone adelina Staudinger, 1887 View in CoL , Mémoires sur les lépidoptères, 3: 191, pl. 10, fig. 14 (Type locality: [ Russia, Far East , Primorye Region , Vladivostok] “ Wladiwostok ”).
Type material examined. Lectotype (hereby designated) ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 34 View FIGURES 34–37 ): male, [ Russia, Primorye Region , Vladivostok] “Wladiwostock” / “ Chionaema | adelina | Stgr. | Hps.” / pink label “Origin.” / “446.” / “ex coll. 1/2 | Staudinger” / “ MfN gen. prep. | A. Volynkin 2021 | No MfN 379 View Materials | ϐ”, DNA voucher MFNLEP1057 ( MfN) . Paralectotype: female, “Wladiwostok” / violet round label / pink label “Origin.” / small rectangular label with unreadable text / “ex coll. 2/2 | Staudinger” / “ MfN gen. prep. | A. Volynkin 2021 | No MfN 380 View Materials | ϐ”, DNA voucher MFNLEP1058 ( MfN) .
Additional material examined. KOREA: 1 male, 1 female, Choanyi / ex coll. Weber 13/57, gen. prep. Nos.: AV2068 (male), AV2069 (female) ( ZFMK) .
Note. The species has been described based on a male and two females ( Staudinger 1887). In order to stabilise the nomenclature, the male syntype preserved in the MfN is hereby designated as the lectotype .
Diagnosis. The forewing length is 14.0–15.0 mm in males and 17.0–17.5 in females. Cyana adelina ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–8 ) is externally similar to C. pratti ( Figs 3–6 View FIGURES 1–8 ) but differs clearly in the forewing lacking the subterminal red line, and the paler hindwing. The male genital capsules of the two species display no remarkable differences and the diagnostic features are found only in the vesica structure, which is markedly shorter and narrower in C. adelina ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 34–37 ), and has shorter diverticula in comparison to the corresponding structures of C. pratti ( Fig. 35, 36 View FIGURES 34–37 ). The differences between the two species are more substantial in the female genitalia: compared to C. pratti ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 49–53 ), those of C. adelina ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 49–53 ) have a broader sclerotised posterior, and a shorter and narrower anterior section of the corpus bursae, and a markedly narrower and somewhat shorter appendix bursae.
Distribution. Southern part of the Russian Far East (Primorye Region) ( Staudinger 1887; Dubatolov et al. 1993; Dubatolov 2014, 2019), Korea ( Daniel 1952) ( Fig. 60 View FIGURE 60 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cyana adelina ( Staudinger, 1887 )
Volynkin, Anton V., Černý, Karel, Huang, Si-Yao & Saldaitis, Aidas 2023 |
Bizone adelina
Staudinger 1887 |