Desmitus Raf., Sylva Tellur. 139. (1838)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.193.78810 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1364F261-B2CA-57A6-950F-D3DEB09EA5B0 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Desmitus Raf., Sylva Tellur. 139. (1838) |
status |
|
2. Desmitus Raf., Sylva Tellur. 139. (1838)
Type.
Desmitus reticulata (Lindl.) Raf. ≡ Camellia reticulata Lindl., Bot. Reg. 13: t. 1078 (1827).
Lectotype
(designated here): Lindl., Bot. Reg. 13: t. 1078 (1827).
Nomenclatural notes.
Rafinesque (1838) established the monotypic genus Desmitus for D. reticulata . This was a new combination based on C. reticulata because he referenced the basionym by the words "Camel. do bot. reg. 1978...". However, the taxon number cited by Rafinesque (1838: 140) is incorrect, but should be recognized as a correctable typographical error of “1078” and so does not prohibit the valid publication of the new combination (Art. 41.3 of the ICN). Nevertheless, Lindley (1827: t. 1078) described C. reticulata based on the living plants that bore semidouble flowers and introduced from China. No specimen was cited in the protologue of C. reticulata . The coloured drawing, t. 1078, was accompanied by the protologue and therefore designated as the lectotype of C. reticulata . Accordingly, the drawing serves as the type of Desmitus (Art. 10.1 of the ICN).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |