Parasyscia Emery, 1882
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1056.68722 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A5067367-7476-4471-B083-284562438CB8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1317CA20-AA4B-5C1E-BD96-5F80E11BEBDE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Parasyscia Emery, 1882 |
status |
|
Parasyscia Emery, in André, 1882c: 235. Type species: Parasyscia piochardi , by monotypy.
Parasyscia subgenus of Cerapachys : Forel 1892 l: 243.
Parasyscia junior synonym of Cerapachys : Kempf 1972 a: 76.
Parasyscia as genus: Borowiec 2016: 198.
Diagnosis.
Parasyscia workers can be identified by the following combination of characters: 1) propodeal spiracle positioned low on the sclerite and propodeal lobes present; 2) presence of a constriction between abdominal segments III and IV; 3) petiole dorsolaterally not marginate; 4) constriction between abdominal segments IV, V, and VI not present; 5) pronotomesopleural suture fused; 6) helcium axial; 7) middle tibiae with a single pectinate spur; 8) pretarsal claws unarmed; 9) abdominal segment III anterodorsally often marginate ( Borowiec 2016).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Parasyscia Emery, 1882
Aswaj, Punnath, Sahanashree, Ramakrishnaiah, Udayakantha, Warnakulasuriyage Sudesh, Aniruddha, Marathe & Priyadarsanan, Dharma Rajan 2021 |
Parasyscia
Emery 1882 |
Parasyscia
Emery 1882 |
Parasyscia
Emery 1882 |
Cerapachys
Smith 1857 |