Peromyscus Gloger, 1841
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7353031 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7207063 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/117C87BF-FFB3-5256-FE84-C76CFC4BF90A |
treatment provided by |
GgServerImporter (2022-10-15 00:13:19, last updated 2024-11-29 05:56:06) |
scientific name |
Peromyscus Gloger, 1841 |
status |
|
Peromyscus Gloger, 1841 View in CoL . Gem. Hand. Hilfs. Nat., 1:95.
REVIEWED BY: S. Anderson (SA); W. Caire (WC); R. P. Canham (RPC); M. D. Carleton (MDC); L. N. Carraway (LNC); D. G. Huckaby (DGH); C. W. Kilpatrick (CWK); T. E. Lawlor (TL); R. H. Pine (RHP); J. Ramirez-Pulido (JRP); G. Urbano-V. (GUV).
COMMENT: Revised by Osgood, 1909, N. Am. Fauna, 28:1 -285; reviewed by Hooper, 1968, in King, ed., The Biology of Peromyscus (Rodentia) , p. 27, and Carleton, 1980. Includes Peromyscus and Haplomylomys as subgenera; formerly included Habromys , Isthmomys, Megadontomys, Ochrotomys, Osgoodomys, and Podomys which were considered distinct genera by Carleton, 1980:118, 122- 127. Morphology of the spermatozoa studied by Linzey and Layne, 1974, Amer. Mus. Novit., 2532:1-20. Yates et al., 1979, Syst. ZooL, 28:40-48, and Patton et al., 1981:288-308, in Smith and Joule, eds., Mammalian Population Genetics, Univ. Georgia Press, Athens, included Neotomodon in Peromyscus, but Carleton, 1980:118, 126, and Hall, 1981:745, considered Neotomodon a distinct genus. The mexicanus group of subgenus Peromyscus was revised by Huckaby, 1980, Los Ang. Cty. Mus. Contrib. Sci., 326:1-24. The boylii group was revised by Carleton, 1977:1-47, and Carleton, 1979, J. Mammal., 60:280-296. The eremicus group was revised by Lawlor, 1971, Occas. Pap. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich., 661:1 -22. Subfamily Hesperomyinae; see comment under Cricetidae.
ISIS NUMBER: 5301410008039000000.
Carleton, M. D. 1977. Interrelationships of populations of the Peromyscus boylii species group (Rodentia, Muridae) in western Mexico. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 675: 1 - 47.
Carleton, M. D. 1980. Phylogenetic relationships in neotomine-peromyscine rodents (Muroidea) and a reappraisal of the dichotomy within New World Cricetinae. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, 157: 1 - 146.
Hall, E. R. 1981. The mammals of North America. Second ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1: 1 - 600 + 90, 2: 601 - 1181 + 90.
Huckaby, D. G. 1980. Species limits in the Peromyscus mexicanus group (Mammalia: Rodentia: Muroidea). Contributions in Science, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 326: 1 - 24.
Linzey, A. V., and J. N. Layne. 1974. Comparative morphology of spermatozoa of the rodent genus Peromyscus (Muridae). American Museum Novitates, 2532: 1 - 20.
Osgood, W. H. 1909. Revision of the mice of the American genus Peromyscus. North American Fauna, 28: 1 - 285.
Yates, T. L., R. J. Baker, and R. K. Barnett. 1979. Phylogenetic analysis of karyological variation in three genera of peromyscine rodents. Systematic Zoology, 28: 40 - 48.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Peromyscus Gloger, 1841
James H. Honacki, Kenneth E. Kinman & James W. Koeppl 1982 |
Peromyscus
Gloger 1841: 95 |
1 (by GgServerImporter, 2022-10-15 00:13:19)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-10-15 09:19:13)
3 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-11-24 02:04:33)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-11-24 04:30:28)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-12-13 06:27:55)
6 (by plazi, 2023-11-07 19:58:26)