Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806)

Zanetti, A., 2008, Synonymies in the European Omaliinae, with notes on distribution (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae), Linzer biologische Beiträge 40 (1), pp. 979-992 : 984

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5429978

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5485953

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/10485D65-5C47-FFDD-FF2D-FF0FFDFCE342

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806)
status

 

Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806) View in CoL

Omalium fuscum GRAVENHORST 1806 View in CoL

Olophrum transversicolle LUZE 1905 View in CoL : synonymy confirmed: Lectotype male (here designated) labelled / Taufers Tir. Luze / Type transversicolle Luze View in CoL / ex coll. Luze (yellow) / Typus Olophrum transversicolle Luze View in CoL (red) / Olophrum fuscum (Gravh.) View in CoL det. Zanetti 2008 aedeagus in Euparal, 3 paralectotypes female with the same data (NHMH ( Fig. 29 View Figs 17-30 ).

C o m m e n t s: Oloprum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806) View in CoL is closely related to O. piceum ( GYLLENHAL 1810) View in CoL and not always easy to distinguish from it. Besides the exoskeletal differences (elytra more flattened, puncuration finer, pronotum less narrowed in front) the aedeagus is decisive for the identification. It is less elongate in O. fuscum View in CoL and the apex of the parameres is different ( HAMMOND 1970b) (Figs 14, 24-30), the two apical setae are more distant. O. transversicolle LUZE 1905 View in CoL , described from Tyrol and distributed in the Eastern Alps, was synonymized with O. fuscum View in CoL by BERNHAUER & SCHUBERT (1910), then considered a valid species by SCHEERPELTZ (1929), a variety of O. fuscum View in CoL by MUNSTER (1935) and a valid species by subsequent authors (e.g. LOHSE 1964 and ZANETTI 1987). The differential characters reported in the literature (sparser and finer puncuration, wider pronotum with almost straight margins in the middle) are not sufficient to consider it a valid species because the shape of the aedeagus, mostly the apex of the parameres, is the same ( Fig. 29 View Figs 17-30 ). A similar level of difference between Central European and Alpine populations in Olophrum View in CoL can be observed in O. consimile GYLLENHAL 1810 View in CoL , whose alpine populations, formerly attributed to different species (see above) are now considered co specific.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Staphylinidae

Genus

Olophrum

Loc

Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806)

Zanetti, A. 2008
2008
Loc

Olophrum transversicolle LUZE 1905

Luze 1905
1905
Loc

transversicolle

Luze 1905
1905
Loc

Olophrum transversicolle

Luze 1905
1905
Loc

O. transversicolle LUZE 1905

Luze 1905
1905
Loc

Olophrum

Erichson 1839
1839
Loc

O. consimile

GYLLENHAL 1810
1810
Loc

Omalium fuscum

GRAVENHORST 1806
1806
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF