Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5429978 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5485953 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/10485D65-5C47-FFDD-FF2D-FF0FFDFCE342 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806) |
status |
|
Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806) View in CoL
Omalium fuscum GRAVENHORST 1806 View in CoL
Olophrum transversicolle LUZE 1905 View in CoL : synonymy confirmed: Lectotype male (here designated) labelled / Taufers Tir. Luze / Type transversicolle Luze View in CoL / ex coll. Luze (yellow) / Typus Olophrum transversicolle Luze View in CoL (red) / Olophrum fuscum (Gravh.) View in CoL det. Zanetti 2008 aedeagus in Euparal, 3 paralectotypes female with the same data (NHMH ( Fig. 29 View Figs 17-30 ).
C o m m e n t s: Oloprum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806) View in CoL is closely related to O. piceum ( GYLLENHAL 1810) View in CoL and not always easy to distinguish from it. Besides the exoskeletal differences (elytra more flattened, puncuration finer, pronotum less narrowed in front) the aedeagus is decisive for the identification. It is less elongate in O. fuscum View in CoL and the apex of the parameres is different ( HAMMOND 1970b) (Figs 14, 24-30), the two apical setae are more distant. O. transversicolle LUZE 1905 View in CoL , described from Tyrol and distributed in the Eastern Alps, was synonymized with O. fuscum View in CoL by BERNHAUER & SCHUBERT (1910), then considered a valid species by SCHEERPELTZ (1929), a variety of O. fuscum View in CoL by MUNSTER (1935) and a valid species by subsequent authors (e.g. LOHSE 1964 and ZANETTI 1987). The differential characters reported in the literature (sparser and finer puncuration, wider pronotum with almost straight margins in the middle) are not sufficient to consider it a valid species because the shape of the aedeagus, mostly the apex of the parameres, is the same ( Fig. 29 View Figs 17-30 ). A similar level of difference between Central European and Alpine populations in Olophrum View in CoL can be observed in O. consimile GYLLENHAL 1810 View in CoL , whose alpine populations, formerly attributed to different species (see above) are now considered co specific.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Olophrum fuscum ( GRAVENHORST 1806)
Zanetti, A. 2008 |
Olophrum transversicolle LUZE 1905
Luze 1905 |
transversicolle
Luze 1905 |
Olophrum transversicolle
Luze 1905 |
O. transversicolle LUZE 1905
Luze 1905 |
Olophrum
Erichson 1839 |
O. consimile
GYLLENHAL 1810 |
Omalium fuscum
GRAVENHORST 1806 |