Scythropopsis, Thomson, 1864
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.06 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D696AE0B-C11E-4A5A-B42B-2A841532E842 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3728382 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/102487A5-FF97-FFF5-1B63-FA62FA7FF813 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Scythropopsis |
status |
|
The following key incorporates the primary characters needed to separate the genera involved in this study:
1. Eyes very finely granulated ( Figs.1‑3 View Figures 1-9 , 10‑12 View Figures 10-18 ) ....................................2
— Eyes slightly to distinctly coarsely granulated ( Figs.4‑6, 7‑9 View Figures 1-9 , 13‑15 View Figures 10-18 ).3
2(1). Elytra distinctly carinate dorsally ( Fig.10 View Figures 10-18 )....................... Scythropopsis View in CoL
— Elytra without carina distant from suture ( Fig.1 View Figures 1-9 )................................. ............................... Acanthoderes (Acanthoderes) and A. (Pardalisia)
3(1). Pronotum ( Figs. 13‑14 View Figures 10-18 ) with distinct central depression, from near base to near apex or only in anterior region, margined by lateral elevation (carinate or not)........................................... Symperasmus
— Pronotum ( Figs. 4‑5, 7‑8 View Figures 1-9 ) not distinctly depressed centrally, nor with lateral tubercles forming carina................................... Aegomorphus View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |