Neurogalesus carinatus Kieffer, 1907: 298
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.75 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E02C736E-661D-407F-9322-24BFB95E233E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3863414 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B6387A7-6C7B-FF85-942E-BE22BD11152F |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Neurogalesus carinatus Kieffer, 1907: 298 |
status |
|
Neurogalesus carinatus Kieffer, 1907: 298 .
Valid name
Neurogalesus carinatus Kieffer, 1907 .
Summary of types
Holotype ♀, BMNH number 9.673, by monotypy.
Primary type data
Type; Mackay/ 3.01; Queensland./ R.E.Turner./ 1907-94; Neurogalesus / carinatus ♀ / type. Kieff./ named by/ J.J.Kieffer.
Type locality
Australia, Queensland, Mackay.
Remarks
This species was described from an unspecified number of females; however, Kieffer describes the scutellum as “vorn beschädigt”, i.e., damaged in front, a rather unusual thing to say. The specimen recognised as the type has been pinned at exactly this point, destroying the basal scutellar pit. Had Kieffer seen any other specimens it is likely they would not have been damaged in precisely this place and he would have described the distinctive bifoveate scutellar pit, so it is considered that he saw only this specimen; hence it is a holotype by monotypy. The holotype is micropinned through the mesosoma and has the head missing. Despite what Kieffer says about its resemblance to a Galesus , this species belongs to the Spilomicrini .
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Neurogalesus carinatus Kieffer, 1907: 298
Notton, David G. 2014 |
Neurogalesus carinatus
Kieffer J. - J. 1907: 298 |